Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils) FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug filed. Apparently that's #570805 (thanks, Jakub). That's a pair of testsuite failures due to a kernel bug and not a regression in elfutils

Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils) FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug filed. Apparently that's #570805 (thanks, Jakub). That's a pair

Bug#630201: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils) FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug

Bug#630201: Bug#570805: [kfreebsd-*] please rebuild elfutils/sid, ignoring the 2 known testsuite failures (Re: transition: liblzma 5)

2011-10-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:38:18AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-29 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:25:31PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:23:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Given this, and if Guillem hasn't responded with a review requiring further work on the branch by sunday, I will upload dpkg 1.16.2 to experimental on sunday (October

Re: Proposed stable update: recoll

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 17:21 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: The version information for #614760 suggests that it also affects testing and unstable currently. If that's not correct, please mark it as closed in an

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite in

Re: Bug#622146: nfs-common: compatibility between squeeze and sid broken

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:05 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: [...] Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly) Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the Adam status of the nfs-utils

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 646156 + confirmed squeeze thanks On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 21:12 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: there were a couple of CVEs for X recently, that Moritz suggested we fixed through p-u. And an input fix to use 64bit arithmetic to avoid overflows with high resolution devices, that's been sitting

Processed: Re: Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 646156 + confirmed squeeze Bug #646156 [release.debian.org] pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646156:

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:12:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze.

ben, edos-debcheck, arch:all

2011-10-29 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi (especially) Mehdi, I’m wondering why http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html lists agda as bad, and I assume that ben considers it a problem if an arch:all package is uninstallable on an architecture, even though the arch:any packages there never have been built. Is that a bug

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: +commit 03ff880e8bf20cdecaf27f03391ea31545ecc22c +Author: Matthieu Herrb matthieu.he...@laas.fr +Date:   Mon Oct 17 22:27:35 2011 +0200 + +    Fix CVE-2011-4029: File permission change vulnerability. + +    Use fchmod() to change

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: What worries me is that there is multi-arch work in dpkg, work that has its origins in Debian. That work is ready enough to be deployed in popular Debian derivatives such as Ubuntu, but is not in Debian proper yet. That is bad for

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 13:38:47 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: +commit 03ff880e8bf20cdecaf27f03391ea31545ecc22c +Author: Matthieu Herrb matthieu.he...@laas.fr +Date:   Mon Oct 17 22:27:35 2011 +0200 + +    Fix CVE-2011-4029: File

Bug#646156: pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-14

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 13:38:47 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: +commit 03ff880e8bf20cdecaf27f03391ea31545ecc22c +Author: Matthieu Herrb matthieu.he...@laas.fr +Date:   Mon Oct 17

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-10-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: nfs-utils_1.2.2-4squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: python-django_1.2.3-3+squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

2011-10-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: python-django_1.0.2-1+lenny3_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rkexs-00048t...@franck.debian.org

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say yes based on the information provided so far. OK. I will prepare the uploads and send the debdiffs for final approval prior to uploading.

3.x kernels fix for the stable module-init-tools

2011-10-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
Please approve the updated module-init-tools package, the trivial patch comes from upstream and has been in testing for months. diff -u module-init-tools-3.12/debian/changelog module-init-tools-3.12/debian/changelog --- module-init-tools-3.12/debian/changelog +++