Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi Moritz, hi all, On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 08:43:06PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Since openjdk-6 is fixed now, now would be a good time to remove sun-java6 from stable in the next point update? sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug, describing its impact to

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug, me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted. It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from oracle and build a fixed package, so IMHO an announcement containing these

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Philipp Kern: sun-java6 is sadly still a very high profile package. I won't go and break all those installations which force sun-java6 over openjdk-6 locally, either in unattended installations or through other means. It's really unfortunate that most of those installations seem to need

Re: excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date

2011-12-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (11/12/2011): excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true. zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore: That's called “out of date” until removal.

excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date

2011-12-11 Thread Robert Millan
excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date but this isn't true. zfsutils removed a few binary packages recently, these are not out of date, they just aren't meant to be present anymore: http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfsutils Will this prevent migration? -- Robert Millan -- To

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I forgot: On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Holger Levsen wrote: $ debdiff sun-java6_6.26-3.dsc sun-java6_6.29-1.dsc|diffstat debian/changelog |8 debian/rules |6 jdk-6u26-dlj-linux-amd64.bin |327520 --

Re: excuses.php claims zfsutils is out of date

2011-12-11 Thread Robert Millan
2011/12/11 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org: See NBS on http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals If you are in a hurry and can't wait for the semi-automatic decruft sessions, file a bug to get them removed. Thanks. I just filed a bug on ftp.d.o. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12/11/2011 01:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug, me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted. It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from oracle and build a fixed

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote: the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently? I believe inside an organisation I can rebundle their bundles to my prefered kind of bundle, that is, form of

Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils

2011-12-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 15:41 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:12:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: ... cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low The version for stable needs to be lower than the

Re: adolc source tarball repack

2011-12-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 20:00 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: Sorry; I assumed no word meant no objections and I should go ahead. In any case this is a simple one: copyright problem, no real changes to the generated binaries. And I'll be happy with whatever you decide. For the record, the

Re: Stable update of hplip for CVE-2011-2722 (#635549) ?

2011-12-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 17:26 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 20:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 14:58 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: * Fix CVE-2011-2722 Insecure tempfile handling by patching the culprit code out. (Closes: #635549)

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes: * Philipp Kern: sun-java6 is sadly still a very high profile package. I won't go and break all those installations which force sun-java6 over openjdk-6 locally, either in unattended installations or through other means. It's really unfortunate that

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-12-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Matthias Klose: On 12/11/2011 01:07 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: sorry, but I'd rather like to have an announcement that it has a bug, me too, for all the reasons Philipp noted. It's also trivial to download the fixed jdk from

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-12-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: acpid_2.0.7-1squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: acpid_2.0.7-1squeeze3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: acpid_2.0.7-1squeeze3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: acpid_2.0.7-1squeeze3_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes

Bug#634797: opencv 2.3 transition

2011-12-11 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, I just upload. Sorry, reply was late. Best regards, Nobuhiro 2011/12/5 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 00:18:45 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:39:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Please let me know when I can start the