Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openvrml_0.18.8-5 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu libproxy_0.3.1-4+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu gxine_0.5.906-1+b3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 09:13:29 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
nmu gjs_1.30.0-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libmozjs9d
nmu gnome_shell_3.2.1-8 . ALL . -m Rebuild against gjs rebuilt against
libmozjs9d
Won't work, gjs fails to build against the new mozjs.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:31:00 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
Dear d-release
according to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pygame
pygame cannot transition in testing because:
Updating pygame makes 3 non-depending packages uninstallable on
kfreebsd-amd64: monsterz,
Il 02/01/2012 10:57, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
pygame 1.8.x is built on kfreebsd. pygame 1.9.x is not.
ah I see.
(Indeed pygame 1.9.x depends on portmidi, that currently does not build
on kfree-*
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=portmidi
)
But why does
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:31 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
according to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pygame
pygame cannot transition in testing because:
Updating pygame makes 3 non-depending packages uninstallable on
kfreebsd-amd64: monsterz, python-pyepl,
hi, related to the pygame problem [1] is another question:
will kfreebsd-* be a release architecture in wheezy?
If yes -
then portmidi has a release critical bug in it, it should
be removed from testing [2], and at the same time pygame
should be built w/o it ;
if no-
then pygame may
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 11:03 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
(Indeed pygame 1.9.x depends on portmidi, that currently does not build
on kfree-*
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=portmidi
)
But why does http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pygame.html
report valid candidate , and it says
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 11:28 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
hi, related to the pygame problem [1] is another question:
will kfreebsd-* be a release architecture in wheezy?
That's certainly the plan right now.
If yes -
then portmidi has a release critical bug in it, it should
be removed from
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:28:45 +0100
A Mennucc mennu...@debian.org wrote:
hi, related to the pygame problem [1] is another question:
will kfreebsd-* be a release architecture in wheezy?
If yes -
then portmidi has a release critical bug in it, it should
Whether any particular arch is a
thanks! to Adam. We will build pygame w/o portmidi on kfreebsd-*.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Subject: transition: libav
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to schedule a transition from libav 0.7 - libav 0.8. As this
release is ABI-compatible to 0.7, only the shlibs file has been
bumped. However, due
Hi all,
what is the status about the call for proposals?
As Jeremiah has kindly provided a first draft, can we add it to the next
DPN in order to better promote participation to it?
Is this ok for the desktop Team?
And for the release Team?
Cheers,
Francesca
--
People assume that time is a
On Mo, Jan 02, 2012 at 15:00:36 (CET), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
[...]
I'd like to schedule a transition from libav 0.7 - libav 0.8. As this
release is ABI-compatible to 0.7, only the shlibs file has been
bumped. However, due to cleaned up header dependencies, a number of
packages in wheezy
Hi,
In response to #627503, I had prepared a stable-security upload of
tinyproxy to address this issue.
After discussing with jmm, we're discarding doing a DSA for this issue as
an exploit can't happen if an attacker doesn't control the configuration
file.
He thinks the patch would be fine for
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 16:47 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
In response to #627503, I had prepared a stable-security upload of
tinyproxy to address this issue.
After discussing with jmm, we're discarding doing a DSA for this issue as
an exploit can't happen if an attacker doesn't control the
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 13:16 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
We want to review the changes before they're uploaded to influence them, i.e.
change them if necessary. The barrier is just higher to reject the package
from p-u-NEW and tell the uploader to reupload a fixed package.
It's also not the
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 15:45 -0800, John Wright wrote:
Attached is a patch to the python-debian package which I intend to
upload to stable. It fixes #597249 [1], which causes problems for some
well-formed data. Specifically, it is problematic when parsing Vcs-Cvs
headers, like
Vcs-Cvs:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 01:21:09PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
An initial mail has been sent to pkg-kde-talk mailing list[1] and a wiki
page[2] is available to track our progress.
The transition could happen once Qt 4.7.4/QtWebKit 2.2.0 migrate to
testing. Qt 4.8.0/QtWebKit 2.2.1 with
I'd like to upload a fix for 651437 as a stable update:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651437
The diff (also in the bug) is:
=== modified file 'debpython/tools.py'
--- debpython/tools.py 2010-12-24 00:06:55 +
+++ debpython/tools.py 2011-01-14 21:54:02 +
@@ -97,9
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:41:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 15:45 -0800, John Wright wrote:
Attached is a patch to the python-debian package which I intend to
upload to stable. It fixes #597249 [1], which causes problems for some
well-formed data. Specifically,
Il giorno 14/dic/2011, alle ore 19:48, Steve McIntyre ha scritto:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 04:58:58PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Il giorno 02/dic/2011, alle ore 12:41, Steve McIntyre ha scritto:
OK, that's fair enough I guess. But are you going to do any work on
the package in the
On Thu, December 29, 2011 14:45, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Thu, December 29, 2011 13:18, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:51:23PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Given that this will be the final point release for lenny, might it
be
worth making an exception this time and also
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=siret...@tauware.de;tag=ftbfs-libav0.8
block 654237 by 653887
Bug #654237 [release.debian.org] transition: libav 0.8
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 654237: 653887
Hi Rene,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 01:21:09PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
An initial mail has been sent to pkg-kde-talk mailing list[1] and a wiki
page[2] is available to track our progress.
The transition could happen once Qt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Jonathan Nieder wrote:
#
# # from rc-alert on packages from
# # http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav.html
#
# Packages not in testing are not a problem. Sorry for the bts churn.
#
# cherokee:
25 matches
Mail list logo
