Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.

2012-02-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Philipp Kern writes: Currently we only ship udebs on CD images, which in turn cannot sanely be PXE booted, AFAIK. I guess we can then conclude that keeping the old installer binaries doesn't actually help anybody. Not even keeping those of r0. We should keep the old sources around in

Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.

2012-02-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes (Re: The current kernel doesn't support the Logical Volume Manager. You may need to load the lvm-mod module.): This is all rather unfortunate. Perhaps we could update the package name of the module udebs when the kernel is updated, and arrange for old installers to use the

Bug#653823: marked as done (transition: boost-defaults)

2012-02-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:32:27 + with message-id e1rszaf-0007ea...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#653823: fixed in boost-defaults 1.48.0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #653823, regarding transition: boost-defaults to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching

2012-02-02 Thread Otavio Salvador
[ Please reply to debian-boot ] To try to work out of box for most situations we use /etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to grab udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders. After this change, following use-cases are covered: - Building from UNRELEASED code:

Bug#653871: libzip2 already uploaded to unstable (was: transition: libzip)

2012-02-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
tag 653871 + pending thanks It looks like libzip was already uploaded to unstable without waiting for the ack for the release team... Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: libzip2 already uploaded to unstable (was: transition: libzip)

2012-02-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 653871 + pending Bug #653871 [release.debian.org] transition: libzip Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653871 Debian

Bug#657288: transition: gdcm

2012-02-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tags 657288 + pending thanks On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al. Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time to - move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable Apparently

Processed: Re: Bug#657288: transition: gdcm

2012-02-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 657288 + pending Bug #657288 [release.debian.org] transition: gdcm Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 657288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657288 Debian

Bug#657288: transition: gdcm

2012-02-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi Adam, On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al. Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time to -

Bug#653871: libzip2 already uploaded to unstable (was: transition: libzip)

2012-02-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 20:59:39 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: tag 653871 + pending thanks It looks like libzip was already uploaded to unstable without waiting for the ack for the release team... And without telling us, which means it's been sitting there for a month without anybody

Bug#653871: transition: libzip

2012-02-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 20:38:35 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: the new libzip 0.10 has a soname bump and will need binNMUs: * ebook-tools * haskell-bindings-libzip * haskell-libzip * ideviceinstaller * osgearth * sigrok What about focuswriter, node-zipfile, odt2txt? Cheers, Julien

Bug#658424: pu: package eglibc/2.11.3-3

2012-02-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu eglibc 2.11.3-2 shipped in Debian Squeeze 6.0.4 suffers from a regression in the resolver code with broken DNS server not answering correctly to requests. It causes the first or sometimes

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2012-02-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-10_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-10_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-10_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: iceape_2.0.11-10_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2012-02-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze5_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze5_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.3.3-7+squeeze5_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes

Processed: reopening

2012-02-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 653823 Bug #653823 {Done: s...@debian.org (Steve M. Robbins)} [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.