Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
pylibtiff does not support the new tiff5 package. Please remove pylibtiff from
testing.
See #663490 for information
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers
Dear Release team,
There seems to be a problem with bug 652061 [1]. According to the messages the
bug is fixed
which this is confirmed if you take a look at the bug list. But in the version
graph the latest
version is still red and also the bug still appears as an excuse, stopping
elmerfem
On 13.03.2012 11:35, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote:
There seems to be a problem with bug 652061 [1]. According to the
messages the bug is fixed
which this is confirmed if you take a look at the bug list. But in
the version graph the latest
version is still red
It's marked as fixed and found in the
Just going through the messages, it is clear that the bug originated from
mpich2 and arpack.
So when these packages were fixed all the versions of elmerfem were fixed.
How can we fix this wrongly handle bug for elmerfem?
Regards,
Mark-Willem
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:12:13 +
From:
[Please don't full-and-top-quote]
On 13.03.2012 13:57, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote:
Just going through the messages, it is clear that the bug originated
from mpich2 and arpack.
So when these packages were fixed all the versions of elmerfem were
fixed.
Well, if it's not a bug in elmerfem, then it
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 16:47, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
* until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
* until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded
* on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing
Are there any non-installer-specific
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:06 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
I would like to make an upload [1] to stable in order to fix bug
#662662 (segfault, double free in getServerByKey()) in php-memcached
package (and include maintainer change too, see #620030).
Thanks for working on fixing this in
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:28 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
there is an annoying non-free file in emboss, and resolving that
problem delays my other works on this package.
Is there a bug report for that? I couldn't see anything in the BTS.
Please remove emboss and the packages that depend on it
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 22:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 27 Feb 2012 21:03:54 +, a écrit :
In this case, from the description I'd assume that it would also apply
to the version of brltty in unstable and afaict from looking at the
source, it hasn't been applied.
As agreed on IRC (#debian-release).
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Your message dated Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:32:44 +
with message-id 1331674364.30742.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Closing outstanding lenny-related bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #545525,
regarding lenny: libpils{0, -dev} and libstonith{0, -dev} became
Your message dated Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:32:44 +
with message-id 1331674364.30742.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Closing outstanding lenny-related bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #603569,
regarding RM: fcitx/lenny -- ROM; not dfsg free
to be marked as done.
This
Adam D. Barratt, le Tue 13 Mar 2012 20:51:02 +, a écrit :
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 22:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 27 Feb 2012 21:03:54 +, a écrit :
In this case, from the description I'd assume that it would also apply
to the version of brltty in unstable
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:34:18PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The full patch between this new package version and the version
1.0.2-1 currently in Squeeze is attached.
+include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
Please could you prepare an update which doesn't introduce a new
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if
needed later as well.
It's fixed already.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 20:20, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if
needed later as well.
It's fixed already.
I'll do translation mass-upload tomorrow
16 matches
Mail list logo
