Bug#658289: marked as done (transition: python-numpy)

2012-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:52:44 +0200 with message-id 20120405085244.ga4...@jwilk.net and subject line Re: Bug#658289: transition: python-numpy has caused the Debian Bug report #658289, regarding transition: python-numpy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#665648: marked as done (transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1)

2012-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:47:58 +0200 with message-id 4f7d785e.6040...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#665648: transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #665648, regarding transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#659202: transition: t38modem 2.0.0

2012-04-05 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 03/29/2012 05:54 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote: On 28/03/12 21:01, Julien Cristau wrote: Is there a new timeline for an updated ekiga in sid, or still a few weeks? Please allow me to answer this Monday, after having done additional checks. FWIW, I sent patches to fix ekiga FTBFS and NMUed it in

Bug#665969: transition: apt 0.9.0

2012-04-05 Thread Niels Thykier
On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote: [...] Hi, Sorry for the delay on our side. On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Michael Vogt wrote: Please provide bin-NMUs for a coming apt ABI change (the apt version in experimental will hit unstable as 0.9.0). Actually you want a

Bug#659202: transition: t38modem 2.0.0

2012-04-05 Thread Eugen Dedu
On 05/04/12 12:50, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 03/29/2012 05:54 PM, Eugen Dedu wrote: On 28/03/12 21:01, Julien Cristau wrote: Is there a new timeline for an updated ekiga in sid, or still a few weeks? Please allow me to answer this Monday, after having done additional checks. FWIW, I sent

Processed: tagging 665969

2012-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 665969 + confirmed Bug #665969 [release.debian.org] transition: apt 0.9.0 Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665969

Processed: tagging 651326

2012-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 651326 + pending Bug #651326 [release.debian.org] transition: muparser Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 651326: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651326

Processed: block 664681 with 653903

2012-04-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 664681 with 653903 Bug #664681 [release.debian.org] transition: KDE's 4.8 release of platform, applications and workspace 664681 was not blocked by any bugs. 664681 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 664681: 653903 thanks

Re: CEGUI library transition

2012-04-05 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi, On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:05, Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org wrote: FWIW, libcegui-mk2-1 is no longer in testing. The transition is finished. Next time, please file a transition bugreport against the pseudo-package release.debian.org to have a transition slot. Sure. I'll do it next

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2012-04-05 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libpng_1.2.44-1+squeeze4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libpng_1.2.44-1+squeeze4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libpng_1.2.44-1+squeeze4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libpng_1.2.44-1+squeeze4_ia64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#667691: nmu: rebuild empathy and gnome-control-center for cheese 3.4

2012-04-05 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu cheese had soname bumps for libcheese and libcheese-gtk so the rdeps need to be rebuilt: nmu empathy_3.2.2-1+b1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against cheese 3.4 nmu gnome-control-center_1:3.2.2-3 .

fixing #667695 for squeeze?

2012-04-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
http://bugs.debian.org/667695 means that squeeze SKS servers currently don't synchronize well with their peers, especially with their peers that have adopted reverse HTTP proxies as a mechanism for high availability (i.e. the peers that are more likely to actually get key updates). The fix to