On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 15:13, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On 21.04.2012 15:10, Julien Cristau wrote:
One way to avoid this is to get a php5 uploaded to experimental built
against the new apache.
We already requested PHP maintainers to do so. Alternatively PHP web
applications can
Hello,
I've been trying to get around to finish d-i release but I've been
failing; I am involved in a huge project at work and haven't had much
free time et all so I couldn't finish it.
I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone
willing to help on it?
I'm sad to ask for
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:50:53 +0200
with message-id 20120423175053.gc31...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#652650: transition: imagemagick
has caused the Debian Bug report #652650,
regarding transition: imagemagick
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:50:19 +0200
with message-id 20120423175019.gb31...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#661746: nmu: netcdf related
has caused the Debian Bug report #661746,
regarding nmu: netcdf related
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi Frankie,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 17:15:09 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
New 1.8 version introduces big changes in packaging to simplify
support of new upstream releases. That should reduce the number
of future transitions and binNMU, making release team and developers
happy.
On 04/06/2012 04:25 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
for (o-)s-p-u requests: please get the fix in unstable/testing first, as
usual.
The bug fix for SKS's peering (#667695) has propagated safely to
testing. This is an standards-compliance interoperability fix for
deployed sks services, so that they
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:01 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
The bug fix for SKS's peering (#667695) has propagated safely to
testing. This is an standards-compliance interoperability fix for
deployed sks services, so that they can function with peers who have
adopted the current
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Frankie,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 17:15:09 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
New 1.8 version introduces big changes in packaging to simplify
support of new upstream releases. That should reduce the number
of future
On 04/23/2012 02:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming that's attached as in attached to my earlier mail of the
5th, please go ahead; thanks.
thanks. It's uploaded now, please let me know if you need anything else
on this.
Regards,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 20:39:01 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Frankie,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 17:15:09 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
New 1.8 version introduces big changes in packaging to simplify
Hi,
On 23-04-2012 18:32, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone
willing to help on it?
Count with me for testing installation images.
Can you elaborate remaining steps where we can help?
I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 21:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 17:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 18:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.49.html
I've scheduled binNMUs for the packages listed in level
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:54:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 20:39:01 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Frankie,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 17:15:09 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 16:06, Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org wrote:
I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone
willing to help on it?
Count with me for testing installation images.
Can you elaborate remaining steps where we can help?
To what we had for a1
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The hurd-i386 buildd isn't keeping up, so 8.2-11 hurd-i386 builds
haven't been replaced with 8.3-1.
This prevents automated removal of kfreebsd-source-8.2 from unstable,
which I believe is what is currently preventing migration of 8.3-1 to
testing.
--
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:41 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 04/23/2012 02:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Assuming that's attached as in attached to my earlier mail of the
5th, please go ahead; thanks.
thanks. It's uploaded now, please let me know if you need anything else
on this.
Processing changes file: sks_1.1.1+dpkgv3-6+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1smrza-dm...@franck.debian.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
