Re: Accepted gcc-defaults 1.118 (source all amd64)

2012-06-01 Thread Touko Korpela
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:40:36PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:42:28PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 31/05/12 07:59, Mike Hommey wrote: FWIW, it has been confirmed to be gcc 4.7 miscompiling. It is supposed to be fixed in upcoming 4.7.1. The Mozilla bug

Bug#675434: nmu: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.48-1

2012-06-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Release Team It was reported [1], that libnet-ssleay-perl does not report the correct constant value for SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1. There was the

Processed: block 675424 with 675434

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 675424 with 675434 Bug #675424 [libnet-ssleay-perl] libnet-ssleay-perl: Incorrect constant value for OP_NO_TLSv1_1 675424 was not blocked by any bugs. 675424 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 675424: 675434 thanks

Re: ia64 qualification for Wheezy

2012-06-01 Thread MG
Hello, First of all, excuse me for the delayed response. On 29-5-2012 2:37, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: There are some pointers at http://lists.debian.org/4fa2a12b.4080...@users.sourceforge.net Thank you very much! I intend to work as an ia64 porter. Sounds good. Out of curiosity,

Re: Bug#674587: transition: mapnik

2012-06-01 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:34:15 +0200, David Paleino wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello RT, I'm requesting to add Mapnik to the transition tracker. [..] *gentle ping* -- . ''`. Debian

Re: Bug#674587: transition: mapnik

2012-06-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
David Paleino da...@debian.org (01/06/2012): On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:34:15 +0200, David Paleino wrote: ^^^ I'm requesting to add Mapnik to the transition tracker. *gentle ping* Your mail is still marked as unread (= needs processing) in my maildir, but 25 20, and:

Bug#675434: nmu: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.48-1

2012-06-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org (01/06/2012): It was reported [1], that libnet-ssleay-perl does not report the correct constant value for SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1. There was the following change in openssl 1.0.1b-1: openssl (1.0.1b-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream version

Re: Bug#674587: transition: mapnik

2012-06-01 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:06:11 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: David Paleino da...@debian.org (01/06/2012): On Fri, 25 May 2012 19:34:15 +0200, David Paleino wrote: ^^^ I'm requesting to add Mapnik to the transition tracker. *gentle ping* Your mail is still marked as

Bug#675447: nmu: netcdf_1:4.1.3-6

2012-06-01 Thread Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello netcdf is causing FTBS for packages that rely on /usr/include/netcdf.mod because they use gfortran-4.7 but the mod file is built against gfortran-4.6. nmu netcdf_1:4.1.3-6 . ALL . -m

Bug#675447: nmu: netcdf_1:4.1.3-6

2012-06-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson ojs...@gmail.com (01/06/2012): netcdf is causing FTBS for packages that rely on /usr/include/netcdf.mod because they use gfortran-4.7 but the mod file is built against gfortran-4.6. we're trying to get that switch reverted, so binNMUing your package might not be

Bug#656829: marked as done (transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 - libexiv2-11)

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:23:20 +0200 with message-id 20120601102320.gm31...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#656829: transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 - libexiv2-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #656829, regarding transition: exiv2 - libexiv2-9 - libexiv2-11 to be marked as

Processed: block 671853 with 671675

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 671853 with 671675 Bug #671853 [release.debian.org] Transition: cpl 671853 was not blocked by any bugs. 671853 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 671853: 671675 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Re: [Pkg-mediawiki-devel] MW 1.19 for wheezy (was Re: [Mediawiki-distributors] LWN's discussion on WordPress and distributions)

2012-06-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, This is just a heads-up with regard to packaging for Mediawiki and its extensions in Wheezy. Upstream recently confirmed that they will be moving to a quarterly release cycle and, as a result, potentially reduced security support. Following our concerns they are prepared to maintain

Processed: block 671115 with 660686

2012-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 671115 with 660686 Bug #671115 [release.debian.org] transition: mysql-5.5 671115 was blocked by: 674328 673528 667428 673263 650058 674122 649955 651110 674309 672714 650060 666331 672619 672950 673264 672716 651317 674210 673262 672765

Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc

2012-06-01 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:33:05PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: I'll let you know of all the issues once we have the core packages ready. It's looking good, I think -- gnustep-base/1.24, gnustep-gui/0.22 and gnustep-back/0.22 are in experimental. Summary of the bugs/issues: gcc-4.7/libobjc4

Re: Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-01 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:18 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote: [...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs for hurd-i386 are not RC. Maybe

Alpha version of xz-utils in wheezy?

2012-06-01 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, I just noticed that the version of xz-utils in wheezy is 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 From upstream's website: Development The new APIs, command line options etc. in development releases should be considered unstable. Incompatible changes to unstable features may be done

Re: Alpha version of xz-utils in wheezy?

2012-06-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Andrew, Andrew Pollock wrote: I just noticed that the version of xz-utils in wheezy is 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 The xz-utils package in sid has been tracking the 5.1.y series for a long time. Unfortunately there hasn't been an official stable release from that branch. From upstream's

Bug#666126: transition: poppler 0.18

2012-06-01 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, Alle giovedì 31 maggio 2012, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: Pino Toscano p...@debian.org (30/04/2012): AFAICS, now the current block for this transition is the kpathsea transiton; also, there are other transitions which would conflict with this (openjpeg, exiv2, gdal, db5.3, ffi). I

Re: Alpha version of xz-utils in wheezy?

2012-06-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Andrew Pollock dixit: I just noticed that the version of xz-utils in wheezy is 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 OK, you’ve just proven me wrong that nobody’d notice that. So it sounds like this version is probably better suited in experimental, and not unstable and testing. 5.0.3 is what wheezy should

Re: Re: Architecture qualification

2012-06-01 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote: [...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs for hurd-i386 are not RC.

Bug#675539: nmu: omake_0.9.8.5-3-8

2012-06-01 Thread Kiwamu Okabe
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu omake_0.9.8.5-3-8 . ALL . -m Recompile to remove warning message Symbol `FamErrlist' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking Omake package has below warning. $ omake