Hi Federico,
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 07:48:17PM +0100, Federico Ceratto wrote:
Please unblock package pymongo
Version 2.2-2 is affected by bug #689283 and #688040
Version 2.2-3, currently in Unstable, fixes those two bugs (and has no other
changes)
Thanks!
You probably meant to ask an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
libfiu wasn't built in an up-to-date sid environment: python-fiu on i386
has unsatisfiable dependency on python ( 2.7).
nmu libfiu_0.91-1 . i386 . -m Rebuild in an up-to-date sid
On 06/10/2012 17:54, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
The gnuradio 3.6.1-1 source was accepted into unstable on 12 June
2012:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnuradio/news/20120612T181727Z.html
Since that was before the Wheezy freeze, this should apply: Any
packages in unstable before the
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 12:29:44 +0200
with message-id 50715998.9050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689839: unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.3.194-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689839,
regarding unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.3.194-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 12:30:42 +0200
with message-id 507159d2.9020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689853: nmu: libfiu_0.91-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689853,
regarding nmu: libfiu_0.91-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 12:32:42 +0200
with message-id 50715a4a.80...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689800: nmu: olsrd_0.6.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #689800,
regarding nmu: olsrd_0.6.3-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On 05.10.2012 09:59, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 23:10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
this should go to wheezy, because
- wrong code gen fixes - the ARM vector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2012 23:19, Arthur de Jong wrote:
What is the release team's opinion on this?
First, we will need a debdiff between testing's version and the one you
want to upload, please.
Kind Regards,
- --
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
-BEGIN PGP
Hi Debian Release,
A small summary of current situation:
- ensymble is in RFA since Jan 2011 (#611552)
- ensymble upstream released 0.29 in May 2010
(http://code.google.com/p/ensymble/downloads/list)
- new upstream 0.29 also fixes #629125
- debian currently has 0.28-2 in sid and wheezy
- 0.28-2
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:45:24 +0200
with message-id 50716b54.1040...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689262: unblock: xchat/2.8.8-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #689262,
regarding unblock: xchat/2.8.8-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:48:50 +0200
with message-id 50716c22.6050...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689158: unblock: tomcat7/7.0.28-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #689158,
regarding unblock: tomcat7/7.0.28-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:33:43 +0200
with message-id 50716897@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688928: unblock: rsyslog/5.8.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #688928,
regarding unblock: rsyslog/5.8.11-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/09/2012 04:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead
upstream developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql
9.1. Therefore, we had to resolve to making an upgrade to slony
version
On 27/09/2012 21:34, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
In order to fix #684823, which solution does the Release Team prefer:
- unblock r-cran-pscl/1.03.10-1.1 which is currently in sid and
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 14:38:57 +0200
with message-id 507177e1.6030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#67: unblock: fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #67,
regarding unblock: fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gtk+3.0
It fixes an annoying bug where the F10 key is not properly handled but
treated like Shift+F10.
Full debdiff is attached.
unblock gtk+3.0/3.4.2-4
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package notification-daemon
Version 0.7.6 contains a single bug fix and translation updates only.
It has been in unstable for 8 days without any new bug reports.
Debdiff
On 15/09/2012 19:51, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
Please unblock package ksh/93u+20120628-1 which fixes #679966
(severity grave).
Frankly it would be better to exclude ksh
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:19:06 +0200
with message-id 5071814a.2070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689869: unblock: gtk+3.0/3.4.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #689869,
regarding unblock: gtk+3.0/3.4.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:17:22 +0200
with message-id 507180e2.9010...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689871: unblock: notification-daemon/0.7.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689871,
regarding unblock: notification-daemon/0.7.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:29:01 +0200
with message-id 5071839d.1040...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687587: unblock: mozc/1.5.1090.102-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #687587,
regarding unblock: mozc/1.5.1090.102-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 14/09/2012 11:52, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Package: release.debian.org http://release.debian.org/
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
mailto:release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package php-apc
The current verson of php-apc in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 689765 [pre-approval request] unblock: libio-socket-ssl-perl/1.76-2
Bug #689765 [release.debian.org] unblock: libio-socket-ssl-perl/1.76-2
Changed Bug title to '[pre-approval request] unblock:
libio-socket-ssl-perl/1.76-2' from 'unblock:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
I couldn't judge by looking at the diff because the top-directory in the
sources is versioned :/ Could you please provide a sensible diff between
the two version (patches applied)?
I haven't applied any patches of my own,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 637809
Bug #637809 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
transition: perl 5.14
Unarchived Bug 637809
unblock 637809 by 637236
Bug #637809 {Done: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
Quoting Modestas Vainius (mo...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
I would like to ask for unblock of 2.8.9-1 for wheezy. Wheezy currently has
2.8.9~rc1 which is a feature complete release
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:33:07 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
CCing the tech-ctte and release-team, as the intent is to coordinate with
both
for approval to upload this NMU.
[..]
I contacted Gregor Hermann and with his help we created a minimal diff for a
new upload targeted for Wheezy, as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package emdebian-crush
This fixes RC bug 688912. There are po and POT line
number changes but the debdiff comparede to testing
is the same as the one attached to the bug
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
It is a pity that the package didn't migrate due to a transient build
failure, but it is not an argument to unblock it. Besides, the diff
between testing's and sid's gnuradio looks rather large
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
It is a pity that the package didn't migrate due to a transient build
failure, but it is not an argument to unblock it. Besides, the diff
between testing's and sid's gnuradio looks rather large and sid's
version doesn't (according to the BTS) fix any
On 07/10/2012 16:25, Lior Kaplan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org
mailto:me...@dogguy.org wrote:
I couldn't judge by looking at the diff because the top-directory in
the sources is versioned :/ Could you please provide a sensible diff
between the two
On 07/10/2012 17:27, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org writes:
It is a pity that the package didn't migrate due to a transient
build failure, but it is not an argument to unblock it. Besides,
the diff between testing's and sid's gnuradio looks rather
large$,1s� and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libxml2/2.8.0+dfsg1-6
This version fixes RC bug #676210 by cherry picking an upstream post
release commit.
diff -Nru libxml2-2.8.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:21:43 +0200
with message-id 5071ac17.3070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689911: unblock: libxml2/2.8.0+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #689911,
regarding unblock: libxml2/2.8.0+dfsg1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:39:38 +0200
with message-id 5071b04a.7080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689890: unblock: emdebian-crush/2.2.19
has caused the Debian Bug report #689890,
regarding unblock: emdebian-crush/2.2.19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi folks,
we delayed d-i wheezy beta 3 because of that nasty netcfg bug, and we
had some buildd fun on powerpc; builds are here now, so please review
push it to wheezy ASAP.
Once that's done (and dinstall has run, and mirror pulse has happened)
I'll probably binNMU debian-installer so that it
Your message dated Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:07:39 +0200
with message-id 20121007170739.gi31...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686702: unblock: gcc-4.6/4.6.3-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #686702,
regarding unblock: gcc-4.6/4.6.3-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 07/10/2012 18:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi folks,
we delayed d-i wheezy beta 3 because of that nasty netcfg bug, and
we had some buildd fun on powerpc; builds are here now, so please
review push it to wheezy ASAP.
Done.
Cheers.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Philipp,
since F*EX is now re-added as non-free with Perl Artistic license I herewith
renew my request to allow the fex package to proceed to testing and thus
allowing users of squeeze an upgrade path.
Cheers,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:35:09PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
since F*EX is now re-added as non-free with Perl Artistic license I herewith
renew my request to allow the fex package to proceed to testing and thus
allowing users of squeeze an upgrade path.
did you submit the filtered diff
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
Looking at the provided diff, I've found for example:
+#ifdef ZEND_ENGINE_2_4
+case IS_CALLABLE:
+/* XXX implement this */
+assert(0);
+break;
+#endif
I'd rather avoid it.
I'm not a C
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
So intead of reverting a patch [1] and re-open a severity normal bug,
you uploaded a new upstream release [2] ?
I would have classified the original bug as grave too. The upstream
release is a bug fix release: they didn't even change the version number
hence the appended
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:23:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Can you provide a pointer to the dpkg pre-dependency discussion?
To comply with the Debian policy I asked[33] about the pre-dependency on
debian-devel@l.d.o and Ian Jackson suggested[38] that this should be
fixed in dpkg instead. I
It seems I've sent this message to an incorrect address first time.
Resending now.
4 жовтня 2012 о 20:55 +0200 Eugeniy Meshcheryakov написав(-ла):
4 жовтня 2012 о 09:39 +0100 Michael Tautschnig написав(-ла):
Package: swi-prolog-nox
Version: 5.10.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification:
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:04:28 +0200
with message-id 5071ee5c.1080...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687616: unblock php-apc/3.1.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687616,
regarding unblock php-apc/3.1.13-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:09:39 +0200
with message-id 5071ef93.2000...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689393: unblock: libmtp/1.1.3-35-g0ece104-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #689393,
regarding unblock: libmtp/1.1.3-35-g0ece104-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:14:11 +0200
with message-id 5071f0a3.7060...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689264: unblock: refpolicy/2:2.20110726-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #689264,
regarding unblock: refpolicy/2:2.20110726-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:22:36 +0200
with message-id 5071f29c.9030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686503: unblock: ruby-compass/0.12.2~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686503,
regarding unblock: ruby-compass/0.12.2~dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
48 matches
Mail list logo
