Bug#702733: marked as done (unblock: arduino-mk/0.8-5)

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:30:26 + with message-id ce211b8e0c01e8b487610475465c7...@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net and subject line Re: Bug#702733: unblock: arduino-mk/0.8-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #702733, regarding unblock: arduino-mk/0.8-5 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#702771: unblock: sqlobject/0.12.4-2.2

2013-03-11 Thread Neil Muller
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package sqlobject sqlobject 0.12.4-2.2 fixes #695233, which prevents it from working properly with the default postgres version in wheezy. Since sqlobject is a database ORM,

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi Thomas, hi Release Team, hi Moodle maintainers. Le jeudi, 28 février 2013 18.00:19, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : So please just re-issue a correctly-versionned Debian package and I'll upload it to unstable (then we'll take a look at the package for testing-proposed- updates). Given that:

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Sorry, missed my footnote: Le lundi, 11 mars 2013 10.49:49, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : c) Moodle 2.2 is already not supported anymore by Moodle HQ for anything (not even security), according to [0]; [0] http://docs.moodle.org/dev/Releases#Moodle_2.2 That allows me to correct what I wrote

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Tomasz Muras
On 03/11/2013 10:49 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: a) we fail at releasing Moodle updates to unstable in a timely manner (and I have my share of the fault here); b) we consequently fail at releasing Moodle security updates to wheezy in a timely manner (this unblock is opened for almost

Bug#702783: unblock: gmpc/11.8.16-6

2013-03-11 Thread Etienne Millon
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello, I uploaded gmpc 11.8.16-6 to fix a localization patch that causes gmpc not to appear in the menu (important bug #694547). Please see attached debdiff to the version in testing.

Bug#702785: unblock: ifenslave-2.6/1.1.0-21

2013-03-11 Thread Guus Sliepen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ifenslave-2.6 This fixes an important bug (#699445) which causes bonding to fail to work correctly after booting in those bonding modes where a primary interface has

Bug#702786: unblock: inputlirc/23-1

2013-03-11 Thread Guus Sliepen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package inputlirc This version fixes an important bug (#689037) which causes inputlirc to crash immediately when started with two or more identical input devices specified

Bug#702787: pre-approval: unblock: python-pyrrd/0.1.0-2

2013-03-11 Thread Elena Grandi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock I'd like to ask if the attached debdiff would be allowed in wheezy. It fixes important bug #691230 by backporting a small patch from the upstream repository; of course there are no other

Bug#702783: marked as done (unblock: gmpc/11.8.16-6)

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:07:15 + with message-id e163e8d3e2676bc2d565796ba9222...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702783: unblock: gmpc/11.8.16-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #702783, regarding unblock: gmpc/11.8.16-6 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#702519: marked as done (unblock/pre-approval: perl and libencode-perl (memory leak in Encode::decode))

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:13:07 + with message-id b4634caca40e699bc27caf5fb3bdf...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702519: unblock/pre-approval: perl and libencode-perl (memory leak in Encode::decode) has caused the Debian Bug report #702519, regarding

Bug#702728: marked as done (unblock: s3ql/1.11.1-3)

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:14:51 + with message-id 74283c580ece3c97095312604cb59...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702728: unblock: s3ql/1.11.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #702728, regarding unblock: s3ql/1.11.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that

Re: [Raspbian-devel] libpam-ubico and signed char on arm in debian and derivatives

2013-03-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
fre 2013-03-08 klockan 01:08 + skrev peter green: Even with the autohell stuff filtered out the debdiff (filtered debdiff attached) still looks pretty intimidating. Release team how should we play this? do you want to unblock the version in sid or should we look into backporting the

Bug#702796: unblock: haskell-certificate et. al.

2013-03-11 Thread Joachim Breitner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is trying to get #701593 into testing. Not all arches have built everything yet, but I guess I can get the unblock on the way. The main

Bug#702799: unblock: sks/1.1.3-2

2013-03-11 Thread Christoph Martin
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package sks I'd like to upload a fix for sks rc bug #699848. The bug prevents sks from building an initial database. Included are the following minimal fixes which do not

Bug#685230: unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4 / -5

2013-03-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hallo Giuseppe, Giuseppe Sacco wrote on 2013-03-11 00:16: I checked your package diff, rebuilt the package and tested it. Then I uploaded it, so hopefully it should enter unstable. Perfectly! Tomorrow I will also check capi4hylafax -19. If you still need a sponsor, I'll gladly upload the

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably have been more useful, fwiw. Noted for the future. The source and amd64 binaries are

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2013-03-11 10:18, Tomasz Muras wrote: On 03/11/2013 10:49 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: a) we fail at releasing Moodle updates to unstable in a timely manner (and I have my share of the fault here); b) we consequently fail at releasing Moodle security updates to wheezy in a

Re: Bug#702799: unblock: sks/1.1.3-2

2013-03-11 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Christoph Martin mar...@uni-mainz.de writes: included is a debdiff. I would upload to testing-updates(?) as soon as you approve. unstable would be the target here as the version in testing and unstable are identical ;-) and you can upload there right away if you're confident -release will

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Tomasz Muras
On 03/11/2013 05:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On 2013-03-11 10:18, Tomasz Muras wrote: On 03/11/2013 10:49 AM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: So as much as I find that unfortunate, I think that the best solution for all of Moodle, Moodle-in-Debian and Debian, is to not ship Moodle 2.2 in

Bug#702412: marked as done (pre-approval unblock: postfix)

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:47:16 + with message-id 6ec8eee430a7ace66346ea91337f8...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix has caused the Debian Bug report #702412, regarding pre-approval unblock: postfix to be marked as done.

Bug#698245: [moodle-packaging] Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:43:02 +0100, Tomasz Muras nexor1...@gmail.com said: Correct. 1.9 is still supported (it won't be for long) and can stay in stable. I am thinking that I would would package 2.5 and then 2.6 in unstable and do not let it migrate into testing - unless LTS upstream version

Re: libnl3: provide static libraries severity

2013-03-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 18:39:21 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: Hi release-team, it might not be in violation of Debian policy to not provide static libraries, but I would still consider this as important with freeze-exception because it is easily fixable, does not introduce anything new

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-11 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:17:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:31:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Cool; thanks. Did you have chance to look at whether fixing the testing package just requires the source file

Bug#702771: marked as done (unblock: sqlobject/0.12.4-2.2)

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:12:00 + with message-id 1363032720.29496.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702771: unblock: sqlobject/0.12.4-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #702771, regarding unblock: sqlobject/0.12.4-2.2 to be marked as done. This

Fw: ifupdown in wheezy

2013-03-11 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello everyone, Forwarding the message to the list as apparently Julien doesn't have enough time for this currently. Since then, 0.7.40 has been uploaded to experimental. I may also provide individual patches for the issues I mentioned below to be reviewed, if necessary. Begin forwarded

Bug#698245: unblock: moodle/2.2.3.dfsg-2.6~wheezy2

2013-03-11 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 06:43:02PM +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: On 03/11/2013 05:22 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Just to clarify before I do it: stable stays as it is; remove moodle from Wheezy and you will work on the basis of getting 2.5 into Jessie? Intermediate versions can always go into

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 20:21 +0100, David Paleino wrote: On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 18:17:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 10:24 +0100, David Paleino wrote: The package I prepared and built for testing also required 2 other patches, to fix

Processed: Re: Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #698341 [release.debian.org] unblock: spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1 (tpu approval) Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 698341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698341 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#702786: unblock: inputlirc/23-1

2013-03-11 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: This version fixes an important bug (#689037) which causes inputlirc to crash immediately when started with two or more identical input devices specified on the command line. This can happen inadvertently

Processed: Re: Bug#702786: unblock: inputlirc/23-1

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #702786 [release.debian.org] unblock: inputlirc/23-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 702786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702786 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: Re: Bug#702785: unblock: ifenslave-2.6/1.1.0-21

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #702785 [release.debian.org] unblock: ifenslave-2.6/1.1.0-21 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 702785: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702785 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#702785: unblock: ifenslave-2.6/1.1.0-21

2013-03-11 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:21:45PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: This fixes an important bug (#699445) which causes bonding to fail to work correctly after booting in those bonding modes where a primary interface has to be selected. Ok... I also enabled hardening

Bug#702787: pre-approval: unblock: python-pyrrd/0.1.0-2

2013-03-11 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:45:16PM +0100, Elena Grandi wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock I'd like to ask if the attached debdiff would be allowed in wheezy. It fixes important bug #691230 by backporting a

Bug#702826: nmu: binutils-z80_2.22-3

2013-03-11 Thread Alberto Garcia
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, binutils recently added a fix for #688951 (CVE-2012-3509) which also affects binutils-z80. The following binNMU will cause the fix to be applied to binutils-z80: nmu

Re: Fw: ifupdown in wheezy

2013-03-11 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 11/03/13 20:30, Andrew Shadura wrote: * Implement inet6/auto for kFreeBSD, call DHCP release of ifdown on Linux (Closes: #701884). Actually these are quite separate things (but they were fixed at the same time). Bug #701884: fixable with ~6 lines of interface definition code,

Bug#702826: marked as done (nmu: binutils-z80_2.22-3)

2013-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:25:48 + with message-id 1363040748.29496.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#702826: nmu: binutils-z80_2.22-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #702826, regarding nmu: binutils-z80_2.22-3 to be marked as done. This means that

Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old components are still in wheezy however, and especially update-manager can be considered to be horribly dangerous: It might break

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old components are still in wheezy however, and especially

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:52:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:52:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: In my opinion, it is really way too late for this. If you want to discourage people from using update-manager in wheezy, a patch to the release notes would be most helpful.

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 01:04:25AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:52:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack

Re: Advice needed: update-manager in wheezy considered dangerous

2013-03-11 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
2013/3/12 Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org: Dear release team, I report this problem as we have switched our package management stack in wheezy from update-manager and other components to PackageKit. Those old components are still in wheezy however, and especially update-manager can be