Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
please unblock openjdk-7/7u3-2.1.7-1, new minor upstream version including two
security issues:
openjdk-7 (7u3-2.1.7-1) unstable; urgency=high
* IcedTea7 2.1.7 release:
* Security
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package dput.
This is an update to 0.9.6.3+nmu1 which tries to prevent uploads to the wrong
archive. The changes in nmu1 were correct at the time of going to press, but
On 2013-03-20 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
On 2013-03-19 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
[...]
Find attached a proposed patch. Its rather obvious downside is that it
will break on ports, due to using a negative list (all except) where
possible and a
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7
Hi,
On 25/03/13 10:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 19:58:31 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Please unblock package ifupdown. This release fixes some important issues
with ifupdown,
and also brings upstart support up to date.
Sorry
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7
Bug #698381 [release.debian.org] unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7' from 'unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6'
--
698381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Hello,
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:46:59 +0100
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7
Steven, thanks for updating the unblock request; I should've done that
myself and forgot to.
I'm not on the Release Team but this change sounds scary to me; it
CC list trimmed and -release added
On 31.03.2013 17:45, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
A new major release R 3.0.0 will come out on Wednesday April 3rd, as
usual
according the the release plan and announcements [1].
It contains major internal changes [2] and requires rebuilds of all R
packages.
On 31 March 2013 at 18:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| Aside from the lack of pre-discussion, co-ordination etc., the last few
| weeks of a freeze _really_ isn't the right time to be starting a large
| (or indeed small) transition in unstable. We now have at least 87 (based
| on this morning's
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 31 March 2013 at 18:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| Aside from the lack of pre-discussion, co-ordination etc., the last few
| weeks of a freeze _really_ isn't the right time to be starting a large
| (or indeed small)
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
In the grand scheme of things, R is a rather peripheral package.
Not sure where you get that idea, but given that you insist on that:
| pkern@franck ~ % dak rm -nR -s testing r-base
| Working... done.
[…]
| Checking reverse
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 14:35:56 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Could you please remove gnutls28 3.0.22-3 from *unstable* to make it
possible to start testing the transition?
We don't handle unstable. You'll have to file a bug against
ftp.debian.org for that.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I'd rather not have the DEP-3 boilerplate in your first patch; with that
removed, please go ahead with an upload to unstable and ping this bug when
it is ready.
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 31 March 2013 at 22:14, Philipp Kern wrote:
| On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:33:46PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| In the grand scheme of things, R is a rather peripheral package.
|
| Not sure where you get that idea, but given that you insist on that:
|
| | pkern@franck ~ % dak rm -nR -s
Your message dated Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:30:23 +0100
with message-id 20130331233023.ga11...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#704297: unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu2
has caused the Debian Bug report #704297,
regarding unblock: dput/0.9.6.3+nmu2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #703818 [release.debian.org] tpu: fonts-vlgothic/20120629-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
703818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703818
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 02:02:58PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Please approve fonts-vlgothic-20120629-2 upload to testing-proposed-updates.
Its fix is tiny as below, and same fix for fonts-ipafont/ipaexfont which is
permitted to introduce wheezy before.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 696564 + moreinfo
Bug #696564 [release.debian.org] unblock: fusioninventory-agent/2.2.3-5
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #696564 to the same tags previously set
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 00:45:04 +0100
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Please go ahead and ping this bug when it is uploaded.
Thanks! uploaded it.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
18 matches
Mail list logo
