On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 07:57 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> release team: please unblock+urgent debian-installer/20130415
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Hi folks,
short time no see!
ftpmasters: please dak copy-installer 20130415
release team: please unblock+urgent debian-installer/20130415
Thanks already!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Apr 15, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > * etc-services: removed console (782/tcp).
> > Reverted because #658077 was totally bogus: this entry is not useful.
> Possibly, if this actually causes a problem. Is it harmless to leave it in
> place?
It is harmful if appears in a release and someb
Am 15.04.2013 12:14, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> For unrelated reasons, d-i will need a new upload, so I can update
> tasksel today as well, before rc2 images get built again.
I don't want to sound like a broken record, but seeing that
network-manager-gnome in task-gnome-desktop was demoted to Reco
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 700205 pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1
Bug #700205 [release.debian.org] unblock (or later pu): libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1
Changed Bug title to 'pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1' from 'unblock (or later
pu): libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1'
> tags 700205
retitle 700205 pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1
tags 700205 + wheezy
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 700205 = pu
thanks
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 10:01 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 03/19/2013 20:10, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Not sure there's still time for this. Might need to
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:56:55 +0100
with message-id <1366055815.18728.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#705365: unblock: chromium-browser/26.0.1410.43-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #705365,
regarding unblock: chromium-browser/26.0.1410.43-1
to be m
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:43:40 +0100
with message-id <20130415194340.gf32...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#705494: unblock: fpc/2.6.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #705494,
regarding unblock: fpc/2.6.0-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 04:30:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 18:42 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > On 2013-02-24 12:37, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > the attached patch fixes an issue with acpid running under systemd.
> [...]
> > > Could the acpid maintainers upload this cha
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:17:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#701538: fixed in acpid 1:2.0.16-1+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701538,
regarding pre-approval of acpid/1:2.0.16-1+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package fpc
Version 2.6.0-9 fixes bug 704252 where it was reported that the package
change the debian/control file during the
[Please CC me, I am not subscribed to the list]
It has been brought to my attention that the Wheezy version of the
shorewall package contains a bug for users with a multi-ISP
configuration. This was fixed by upstream in a subsequent release and
the user has requested that the fix be included in W
Steven Chamberlain (15/04/2013):
> I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should work'...
Well, maybe that's just me, but that “should work” is no certainty at
all, nobody says “works for me” (quite the contrary, given Didier's
feedback after that). This “should work” was also drown
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>On 15/04/13 11:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> But you should have made it clear when I asked. I thought I made it
>> clear I needed feedback, and I wrote “*right now*”.
>
>I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should
On 15/04/13 11:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> But you should have made it clear when I asked. I thought I made it
> clear I needed feedback, and I wrote “*right now*”.
I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should work'...
> For unrelated reasons, d-i will need a new upload, so I can u
Steven Chamberlain (15/04/2013):
> For all the problems OdyX mentioned from testing, I've found a single
> cause and filed bug #705435. I've updated this page to demonstrate a
> functioning GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME
>
> On 1
For all the problems OdyX mentioned from testing, I've found a single
cause and filed bug #705435. I've updated this page to demonstrate a
functioning GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD:
https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME
On 15/04/13 05:53, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I wa
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #705356 [release.debian.org] unblock: netbase/5.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
705356: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705356
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package netbase
I'm afraid not, as it currently stands:
> netbase
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:40:10 +0100
with message-id <20130415074010.gd32...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#705039: tpu: routino/2.2-4+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #705039,
regarding tpu: routino/2.2-4+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:39:43 +0100
with message-id <20130415073943.gc32...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#704849: t-p-u: tucnak2/2.47-2+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #704849,
regarding t-p-u: tucnak2/2.47-2+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means t
21 matches
Mail list logo
