libproxy built fine everywhere. Can you schedule binNMUs for:
glib-networking
merkaartor
openconnect
transmission-remote-gtk
vagalume
tomboy needs a sourceful upload but we've already notified the maintainers.
Thanks,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 2013-11-04 10:10, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
libproxy built fine everywhere. Can you schedule binNMUs for:
glib-networking
merkaartor
openconnect
transmission-remote-gtk
vagalume
tomboy needs a sourceful upload but we've already notified the maintainers.
Thanks,
Emilio
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
unfortuntely, I forgot to provide a build-dependency upload to wheezy-backports
when I
uploaded nodejs. Now, that all B-Ds for nodejs are in wheezy-backports, I'd be
happy if
you
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #728698 [release.debian.org] nmu: nodejs_0.10.21~dfsg1-1~bpo7+1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
728698: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-11-04 12:19, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
Hi,
unfortuntely, I forgot to provide a build-dependency upload to
wheezy-backports when I
uploaded
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #728698 [release.debian.org] nmu: nodejs_0.10.21~dfsg1-1~bpo7+1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
close -1
Bug #728698 [release.debian.org] nmu: nodejs_0.10.21~dfsg1-1~bpo7+1
Marked Bug as done
--
728698:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: close -1
Hi Niels,
On Mo 04 Nov 2013 12:33:14 CET, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-11-04 12:19, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
Hello Mike,
On 04/11/13 11:19, Mike Gabriel wrote:
unfortuntely, I forgot to provide a build-dependency upload to
wheezy-backports when I
uploaded nodejs. Now, that all B-Ds for nodejs are in wheezy-backports, I'd
be happy if
you could re-trigger a second build of nodejs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 728636 by 728179
Bug #728636 [src:lcgdm] lcgdm: FTBFS: libcgsi_plugin_voms.so: undefined
reference to `soap_init_LIBRARY_VERSION_REQUIRED_20812'
728636 was not blocked by any bugs.
728636 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of
On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the
ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS).
We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been a release goal:
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: owner -1 !
On 2013-11-01 18:58, Marcin Kulisz wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'd like to upload subjected package to sid, as kde transition finished some
time ago, I assume it's ok to do so, right?
Sorry for the delay; I believe we are ready to start this, so please go
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 728253 + wheezy
Bug #728253 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libnet-smtp-tls-butmaintained-perl/0.17-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
tags 728461 + wheezy
Bug #728461 [release.debian.org] pu: package nagios3/3.4.1-3+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:42 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
a few days ago, new PostgreSQL microreleases were announced:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1487/
This time there are no security or critical fixes, just the usual lot
of normal bug fixes.
[...]
Squeeze has the update to 8.4.18.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 19:55 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
I've prepared a new version of libdatetime-timezone-perl for wheezy
in git. It's based on the Olson DB 2013h (2013g was skipped, so this
release contains both).
Please go ahead; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #728137 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2013h
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
728137: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728137
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.4_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.4_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: nss_3.14.4-1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.14.4-1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.14.4-1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.14.4-1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss_3.14.4-1_ia64.changes
Hi,
I'm currently digging through old closed bug reports that have not been
archived, yet, fixing up found/fixed versions, tags, ... that prevent
archival.
Now I've come across some RC bugs that are tagged wheezy-ignore, fixed
in jessie/sid, but affect squeeze as well, e.g.
#687815 maintainer
Processing control commands:
tags -1 confimed pending
Unknown tag/s: confimed.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch
Control: tags -1 confimed pending
Control: owner -1 !
On 2013-10-29 11:13, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Control: retitle -1 transition: glew 1.10
Hi again!
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Update: after a quick rebuild against pure unstable, it seems like
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 714040 + confirmed
Bug #714040 [release.debian.org] transition: glew 1.10
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
714040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714040
On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the
ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS).
We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been a release goal:
Hello Adam,
Adam D. Barratt [2013-11-04 23:08 +]:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 12:42 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
a few days ago, new PostgreSQL microreleases were announced:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1487/
This time there are no security or critical fixes, just the usual lot
of
On 2013-11-03 23:04, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
I suppose a sponsor-only DD could be sufficient, provided that the
sponsor knows the porters well enough to be willing to sign off on e.g.
access to porter boxes. I guess the
24 matches
Mail list logo