Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:50:31 +0100
with message-id <52ca5237.70...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#734321: nmu:
qtbase-opensource-src_5.2.0+dfsg-5/experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #734321,
regarding nmu: qtbase-opensource-src_5.2.0+dfsg-5/experimental
to be marke
Le Sun, 5 Jan 2014 01:54:07 +0100,
Laurent Bigonville a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded libgphoto2 2.5.2 to experimental and it's now in the
> archive.
>
> The following packages are failing and will require a new upstream
> release, I didn't look at this yet:
>
> gphoto2_2.4.14-1
> gphotofs_0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Please take note this if for experimental.
nmu qtbase-opensource-src_5.2.0+dfsg-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against newer
libxcb-sync."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT pr
On 05/01/2014 18:47, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>> We can help as porters but we can't maintain abandoned codepaths on our own.
>> I
>> think GDM upstream doesn't want to deal with this problem, so perhaps it is
>> better
>> if we accept that GDM is not a portable program anymore, and make it
Wiadomość napisana przez Robert Millan w dniu 5 sty 2014, o godz. 12:22:
> On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
dialogue wi
On 2014-01-05 Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-01-05 12:11, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> The reason why we have versioned conflicting -dev packages is that I
>> needed to have both available in sid for an extended period of time. -
>> libtasn1-6 has minor API breakage and the respective changes t
On 2014-01-05 12:11, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-01-05 Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-11-30 11:59, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>
>>> I would like to finally (now that l
On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
>>> dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME
>>> is on kFreeBSD
On 2014-01-05 Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-11-30 11:59, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>> I would like to finally (now that libimobiledevice builds again) get
>> rid of libtasn1-3
On 2013-11-30 11:59, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to finally (now that libimobiledevice builds again) get
> rid of libtasn1-3.
>
> This should a small pain
On 2013-11-30 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> I would like to finally (now that libimobiledevice builds again) get
> rid of libtasn1-3.
[...]
ping?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A
On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
>> dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME
>> is on kFreeBSD (vs. where it is supposed to be). Once that is
12 matches
Mail list logo
