Re: Requesting permission to upload certificatepatrol 2.0.14-4+deb7u1 to s-p-u

2014-02-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2014-02-10 21:51, Christoph Biedl wrote: Adam D. Barratt wrote... Please feel free to upload that version; thanks. Thanks, now uploaded. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#733740: ping... Re: Processed: bug 733740 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libdotconf0.html

2014-02-14 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, I am sure I would have received an confirmed message, but he On 13-02-14 21:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: forwarded 733740 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libdotconf0.html So now dotconf has a transition tracker. What is the estimated time that this transition can

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-02-14 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: certificatepatrol_2.0.14-3+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1weetn-0005os...@franck.debian.org

Bug#738978: transition: x264

2014-02-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I've prepared a new upstream release of libx264, and we need to rebuild all applications that link against it. AFAIUI, this transition should be rather smooth because it affects only a

Bug#731402: transition: spatialite

2014-02-14 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Thanks for setting up the trackers. As just posted to the debian-gis list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/02/msg4.html Am I correct that when we get the go ahead the transition process will be as follows? 1) upload spatialite 4.1.1-6 to unstable 2) upload

Bug#736920: transition: libcogl15

2014-02-14 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 at 12:17:51 +, Simon McVittie wrote: Various packages in GNOME 3.10 depend on clutter1.0 from experimental. The first step towards a new GNOME in unstable (or less painful installations from experimental) seems to be to upgrade src:cogl GNOME maintainers: do you want to

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check

2014-02-14 Thread Andreas Barth
* Robert Millan (r...@debian.org) [140214 00:11]: On 12/02/2014 20:06, Niels Thykier wrote: As I see it, there are two concrete problems with the (number of) supported packages. First, the number of packages actually built on kFreeBSD is just shy of 90%, whereas most other release