Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:20:43 +
with message-id e1webqr-0004w1...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#732329: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #732329,
regarding RM: iceape -- RoST; no longer security-supported
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 738791 + pending
Bug #738791 [release.debian.org] transition: qhull
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
738791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738791
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Each of the bugs referenced below is for a package which was included in
the 6.0.9 point release
limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 738935 + wheezy
Bug #738935 [release.debian.org] pu: package qlandkartegt/1.5.0~dfsg1-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
tags 738944 + wheezy
Bug #738944 [release.debian.org] pu: package spamassassin/3.3.2-5+deb7u1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
thanks
On 15-02-14 11:00, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:21:03 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
There's no ETA. But not before the blocking bugs are fixed.
Oh, if that is what you are waiting for, I will upload the NMU nearly
immediately. I thought it would be clear that I had permission
Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:00:34 +0100
with message-id 52ff48d2.4050...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#730856: transition: libtasn1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #730856,
regarding transition: libtasn1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 2014-02-01 02:36, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
Hi team,
Looking at buildd status, my 'libunwind' package has been Installed
successfully on all the architecture that the package is expected to be
built on. However, it has never entered testing. Check why [1] says that
libunwind7 and
Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:06:47 +0100
with message-id 52ff4a47.3000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#729289: transition: openscenegraph
has caused the Debian Bug report #729289,
regarding transition: openscenegraph
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 2014-02-14 00:23, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 12/02/14 20:06, Niels Thykier wrote:
kFreeBSD is just shy of 90%, whereas most other release architectures
are at 96%[1]. Here kFreeBSD has increased in the past quarter from
~89.5% to almost, but not quite 90%.
I'm a little puzzled you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: anac...@packages.debian.org, mbi...@debian.org, bi...@debian.org
Dear Release Team,
Please find attached a proposed update for anacron. It fixes #688665:
basically,
Do you need anyone to test this for you on Ubuntu 13.10 64bit?
If you point me to where to get it I can probably figure out how to
install it.
-Pat
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:09:55 +0100
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
On 2014-02-09 12:38, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
We have fixed versions
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: sage-extens...@packages.debian.org
Dear Release Team,
The version of flashblock currently in wheezy does not work against
iceweasel 24 (in stable-security), see
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We have a new libav transition pending. Libav 10 is prepared in
debian/experimental, and I've started to build packges against this new
version; in fact, more or more packages
Hi Reinhard
On 2014-02-15 17:42:41, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Unfortunately, this new release does break a number of packages in the
debian archive. At upstream, we are concerned about this and have
conducted a survey about the fallout here:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/mnrZI5XlxP
I'm not a
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 19:37:54 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Reinhard
On 2014-02-15 17:42:41, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Unfortunately, this new release does break a number of packages in the
debian archive. At upstream, we are concerned about this and have
conducted a survey about
control: unblock 731861 by 737366
Hi release team,
Problem with transmission package is resolved.
What is the next step?
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing control commands:
unblock 731861 by 737366
Bug #731861 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnc
731861 was blocked by: 737366
731861 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 731861: 737366
--
731861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731861
Debian Bug
17 matches
Mail list logo
