On 2015-02-12 22:18, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2015-02-12 13:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Possible avenues include updating the forks and working on making the
>>> forks
>>> no longer necessary.
>> are these forks maintained in VCSs?
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/buildd-tools/sbuild.git/log/?h
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 d-i
Bug #13 [release.debian.org] unblock: xorg-server/2:1.16.4-1
Added tag(s) d-i.
--
13: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=13
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tags -1 d-i
On 2015-02-11 20:12, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-debbugs-cc: k...@debian.org
>
> Please unblock package xorg-server. New upstream stable release with a
> few bug
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u6_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u6_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u6_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbus_1.6.8-1+deb7u6_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking planned upload of package freerdp.
+ [ Bernhard Miklautz ]
+ * debian/patches:
++ Add patch 0001_fix-cmdline-parser.patch (picked from upstream).
+ Fix
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
> Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
>
> On 2015-02-12 05:32, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Here is a new debdiff. (tested in its original upstream version
> > in v0.36) Maybe it would've been easier to squash the two patches,
> > but this way it's easier t
Processing changes file: frogr_0.7-2+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ym1pl-0002pi...@franck.debian.org
On 2015-02-12 13:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
Possible avenues include updating the forks and working on making the
forks
no longer necessary.
are these forks maintained in VCSs?
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/buildd-tools/sbuild.git/log/?h=buildd-0.64
Historically forks have been needed because
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 778196 by 778254
Bug #778196 [openafs-modules-dkms] Fails to built with current Jessie's kernel
778196 was not blocked by any bugs.
778196 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 778196: 778254
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Bug #778196 was filed against openafs-modules-dkms to note that the
latest kernel to hit jessie (which was the unblock request in #776899)
causes the DKMS module to fail to build. The new kernel introduced a
KPI change for accesses to the d_alias field
Van een heerlijk Espresso moment genieten op kantoor?
Test tijdens een vrijblijvende degustatie het exclusief design toestel van
Belmoca en proef gratis onze 6 verschillende smaken!
Interesse in dit aanbod?
Vraag hier uw vrijblijvende degustatie op kantoor aan:
http://www.kapamedia.eu/belmoca/for
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:41:53 +
with message-id <1423766513.18703.3.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#56: unblock: quota/4.01-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #56,
regarding unblock: quota/4.01-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:40:24 +
with message-id <1423766424.18703.2.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#57: unblock: wss4j/1.6.15-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #57,
regarding unblock: wss4j/1.6.15-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Package is in DELAYED, nothing we can do atm
> tags 54 + moreinfo
Bug #54 [release.debian.org] pre-approval: unblock: cqrlog/1.8.2-1.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 04:02:51 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
>
>> Updated version of debdiff, removing the -O3 change.
>>
> The changelog still says "build with -O3".
>
Updated as attached.
Cheers,
Aron
libxml2_2.9.1+dfsg1-5.debdiff
Descriptio
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:51:57 +0100 Ivo De Decker wrote:
> tags 777205 wontfix
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:45:13PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Please unblock package refpolicy
>
> > The source package refpolicy had been removed from testing.
>
> The removal happened in Decemb
Hi,
2015-02-11 20:46 GMT+01:00 Peter Palfrader :
> It seems the buildd team is severely understaffed and needs help.
If this rumor turns to be a reality, are there some prerequisites
potential volunteers could have a look to in the event they want to
apply for the role?
Cheers,
Luca
--
To UNS
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2015, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> The Debian buildd network uses a fork of the buildd and sbuild packages
> instead of the packages we ship in the archive.
are the bugs about these issues?
> These packages, maintained by the builddadm team are shipped via
> buildd.debia
On 11 February 2015 at 23:24, Russell Sim wrote:
> On 9 February 2015 at 09:36, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
>> I'm afraid we cannot accept 0.21.3-1.1 in Jessie because the changes are
>> quite large. Can you please prepare an upload targetting jessie based on
>> 0.21.1-2.1?
>>
>
>
> Thanks for looking
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wss4j, the version 1.6.15-2 fixes two security issues
(#41).
Thank you
unblock wss4j/1.6.15-2
dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package
(/home
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package quota
quota is build with libtirpc which has struct definitions differing from
glibc's. Therefore it should be build with libtirpc's header files. 4.01-7
only links t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team!
I recently tried to install cqrlog on Debian unstable. Unfortunately,
this failed since the dependencies and the recommends of the cqrlog
package have an unlu
22 matches
Mail list logo
