Dear Matthias, Dear release team,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
The libstdc++6 transition will be a large one, and it will come with a
lot of pain. Please help it by preparing the follow-up transitions
I have planned to open a release bug for make a
Hi Emilio!
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote:
So `pkg-config --cflags glew' used to return -I/usr/include/GL in 1.10, but no
longer does in 1.12.
Since the rest of the packages #include GL/glew.h, they can find the header
just fine. But this
On 02/07/15 09:33, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Hi Emilio!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org
wrote:
On 01/07/15 17:10, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
Hi Jonathan!
On Thu, 21 May 2015 11:59:44 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
wrote:
Could you
On 07/02/2015 06:45 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 01/07/15 14:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/26/2015 03:01 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 25/06/15 17:44, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/25/2015 01:20 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/25/2015 11:23 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
-
Hello,
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 08:02:55PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This release fixes several bugs related to upgrades from wheezy. The
equivalent version is already
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
nmu snimpy_0.8.6-1 . ALL . -m New python-cffi version
Currently, a module depending on python-cffi must depend on the exact
source version
Hi Peter, hi release team,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 01:45:11AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-2+deb8u1
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:35:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: retitle -1 pu: package stunnel4/3:5.06-3
Control: tag -1 jessie
Your message dated Fri, 03 Jul 2015 20:09:01 +0200
with message-id 5596cfbd.9080...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#789028: transition: gnome-panel
has caused the Debian Bug report #789028,
regarding transition: gnome-panel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:56:39AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
I might be missing something here, but if you are going to rename the
library package, don't you also have to enforce a build against g++-5?
Otherwise you might end up with a libfoov5 package which was built
against gcc 5.
Well,
Am 03.07.2015 um 23:54 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
tags 791205 patch
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791205 + transition
block 791205 by 790756
reassign 791205 release.debian.org
thanks
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:12:53PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package:
tags 791289 + patch
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791289 + transition
block 791289 by 790756
reassign 791289 release.debian.org
thanks
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:14:23PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:snappy
Version: 1.1.2-4
Severity: important
Tags: sid
tags 791205 patch
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791205 + transition
block 791205 by 790756
reassign 791205 release.debian.org
thanks
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:12:53PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:movit
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 791205 patch
Bug #791205 [src:movit] movit: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
Added tag(s) patch.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 791289 + patch
Bug #791289 [src:snappy] snappy: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is
the default
Added tag(s) patch.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: jessie
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: rho...@debian.org
Hi,
I'd like to upload wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.7-2+deb8u1 to jessie-pu to fix
CVE-2015-5069 and CVE-2015-5070 (these CVEs are marked no-dsa in the
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: wheezy
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: rho...@debian.org
Hi,
I'd like to upload wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-3+deb7u2 to wheezy-pu to fix
CVE-2015-5069 and CVE-2015-5070 (these CVEs are marked no-dsa in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 760849 with 790958
Bug #760849 [release.debian.org] transition: glew
760849 was blocked by: 790859 790857 787746 790776
760849 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 760849: 790958
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #790939 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.7-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
790939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790939
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 01:30 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'd like to upload wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.7-2+deb8u1 to jessie-pu to fix
CVE-2015-5069 and CVE-2015-5070 (these CVEs are marked no-dsa in the
security tracker and the security team has asked me to get these CVEs
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 01:33 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'd like to upload wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-3+deb7u2 to wheezy-pu to fix
CVE-2015-5069 and CVE-2015-5070 (these CVEs are marked no-dsa in the
security tracker and the security team has asked me to get these CVEs
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #790940 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package
wesnoth-1.10/1:1.10.3-3+deb7u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
790940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790940
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
21 matches
Mail list logo
