- - beignet builds fine with llvm-3.6, but needs a sourceful upload
because of hardcoded dependencies on control file
That's there because, while it builds and mostly works with 3.6, this at
least used to sometimes hit a bug:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Beignet/
As I do not have
On 19/09/15 15:27, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 28/07/15 23:23, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> Hello release team.
>>>
>>> We are not at a point where it makes sense to switch the default ruby
>>> in unstable. I have been
On 07/09/15 17:45, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update?
Cheers,
Emilio
On 2015-09-30 7:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:14:02 +0200
Source: r-cran-epi
Binary: r-cran-epi
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.71-1
Distribution: testing-proposed-updates
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 30/09/2015 00:37 :
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 21/09/15 13:08, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> Ping.
>
> I think we can do this now. Go for it.
Release 1.8.15-patch1+docs-4 upploaded to unstable.
Thanks,
_g.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hello,
Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM & Clang 3.6. The changes have
> been in exp for a while.
> However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
>
Can we start this transition?
FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been
Hello all,
Here is a quick update on progress since my last update on 7th Sept:
The current stats for this transition are as follows:
* Number of binNMUs needed: 570[1] (was 571)
* Number of arch:any packages which FTBFS with perl 5.22: 7 (was 8)
* 1 fix pending; 6 needing more work or
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 16:21 +1000, Carl Suster wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26/07/15 02:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Once 1.0.5-2 is in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #792468 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package plowshare4/1.0.5-2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
792468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-suitesparse.html
Control: block -1 by 793762 793765 800101 793764
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a transition
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-suitesparse.html
Bug #800556 [release.debian.org] transition: suitesparse4.4
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-suitesparse.html'.
> block -1 by 793762
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 800509 transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6
Bug #800509 [release.debian.org] LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?
Changed Bug title to 'transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6' from 'LLVM default to 3.6
transition ?'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Your message dated Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:12:37 +0200
with message-id <560bb595.4000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#798744: nmu: promoe esperanza
has caused the Debian Bug report #798744,
regarding transition: xmms2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi,
sorry for top-posting...
LO uses only the headers so it's indeed ok to have no dependency. And also to not rebuild it as it was already checked to still build.
Regards,
Rene
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android Mobiltelefon mit GMX Mail gesendet.
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30.09.2015 13:31, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/09/15 13:25, Daniel Stender wrote:
>> [Note: I'm CC-ing this to the sponsor]
>>
>> Thank you for the confirmation.
>>
>> Question: we've already rebuilded 0.10.0 in experimental for the gcc 5
>> transition [1],
>> is it o.k. to combine
[Note: I'm CC-ing this to the sponsor]
Thank you for the confirmation.
Question: we've already rebuilded 0.10.0 in experimental for the gcc 5
transition [1],
is it o.k. to combine both transitions with the same upload?
Daniel Stender
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/794736
libvigraimpex:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-debbugs-cc: sylves...@debian.org
On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am planning to update
Control: tags -1 confirmed
[ Rene, see question below re LO ]
On 20/07/15 21:43, Daniel Stender wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: block -1 by 792696
>
> Hello release team,
>
> I would like
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #793044 [release.debian.org] transition: libvigraimpex
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
793044: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793044
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 30/09/15 13:25, Daniel Stender wrote:
> [Note: I'm CC-ing this to the sponsor]
>
> Thank you for the confirmation.
>
> Question: we've already rebuilded 0.10.0 in experimental for the gcc 5
> transition [1],
> is it o.k. to combine both transitions with the same upload?
Yes, that's fine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi:
- - beignet builds fine with llvm-3.6, but needs a sourceful upload
because of hardcoded dependencies on control file
- - julia same issue, but FTBFS after changing the control and rules files
gcc -march=x86-64 -m64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-
> On 30/09/15 00:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> binNMUs scheduled.
>
> Oops. Totally messed the changelogs there.
>
> Emilio
Thanks! Besides the libarmadillo5 thing it seems to have gone smoothly.
Cheers,
Miguel
Processing changes file: plowshare4_1.0.5-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
On 30/09/15 23:27, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here is a quick update on progress since my last update on 7th Sept:
Thanks.
> Release team: can we upgrade the FTBFS bugs to RC now so they get
> a bit more attention
Yes.
> and do you have a feeling for when you might
> be ready
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Wed 30 Sep 2015 00:55:00 +0200, a écrit :
> > * starpu-contrib/hwloc-contrib/eztrace-contrib have been tested to build
> > with cuda 6.5 and gcc 5 (after the header fix), manual binNMUs will be
> > built by either Samuel (the maintainer) or myself.
>
> You can go ahead
On 2015-09-30 00:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> You can go ahead with this.
Uploaded nvidia-cuda-toolkit_6.5.14-2.
Andreas
On 23/08/15 13:04, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> openvdb is the only package with build-deps on log4cplus
Does it build/work with the new log4cplus? If so, you can go ahead.
27 matches
Mail list logo
