Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: redis_2.8.17-1+deb8u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing chan
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
ACC
Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_allonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mariadb-10.0_10.0.20-0+deb8u1_armel.ch
Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: unzip_6.0-8+deb7u4_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: unzip_6
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 14:11 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:49 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I'd like update redis in stable to fix an issue when running under
> > systemd (#803233). Most documentation on the inte
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #803467 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package redis/2:2.8.17-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
803467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803467
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:49:06 +0100
with message-id <56352942@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803610: nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803610,
regarding nmu: coinor-csdp_6.1.1-1 dsdp_5.8-9.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
> You can go ahead.
uploaded, thanks.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
During the Wheezy release cycle, the libblas3gf package was renamed libblas3
(and similarly liblapack3gf->liblapack3, libatlas3gf-base->libatlas3-base).
Since there was no
Processing changes file: exfat-utils_1.1.0-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #803362 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package exfat-utils/1.1.0-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
803362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803362
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 16:37 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:22:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please go ahead; thanks.
>
> Uploaded for jessie.
Flagged for acceptance.
> This ack was only for jessie and we handle the wheezy
> upload in
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 31/10/15 19:42, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> hi release team,
>
> gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures
> or functional problem
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #803605 [release.debian.org] transition: gpsd
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
803605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803605
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
hi release team,
gpsd needs a transition again. I do not expect build failures
or functional problems in the packages using libgps or
libqgpsmm.
Please let me know when I should upload
On 31/10/15 18:01, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu libdogleg_0.09-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against suitesparse
> 4.4.5"
> nmu ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3 . amd64 . expe
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:26:52 +0100
with message-id <563507ec.9020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803596: nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1
ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #803596,
regarding nmu: libdogleg_0.09-1 ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 803590 RM: core-network -- RoST; security issues
Bug #803590 [release.debian.org] RM: core-network/4.7-2
Changed Bug title to 'RM: core-network -- RoST; security issues' from 'RM:
core-network/4.7-2'
> tags 803590 + jessie pending
Bug #80
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libdogleg_0.09-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against suitesparse
4.4.5"
nmu ceres-solver_1.10.0~dfsg0-3 . amd64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
suitesparse 4.4.5"
The mai
I agree.
Thanks!
Eriberto
2015-10-31 13:47 GMT-02:00 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Hi Stable Release managers,
>
> Joao Eriberto Mota Filho (maintainer of core-network) is
> X-Debbug-CC'ed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 789077 with 803587
Bug #789077 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.2
789077 was blocked by: 791848 791846 803589 791847 803489
789077 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 789077: 803587
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi Stable Release managers,
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho (maintainer of core-network) is
X-Debbug-CC'ed.
If the core-network daemon is started, then #799756 explains
core-network allows privilege e
Processing control commands:
> block 789077 by -1
Bug #789077 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.2
789077 was blocked by: 803489 791847 791846 791848
789077 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 789077: 803589
--
789077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789077
8
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:20:22PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 11:52 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:22:52PM +1000, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Is the policy for what gets included in the stable branches described
> > > somewhere?
> >
> > It's doc
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:49:15 +0100
with message-id <5634d4eb.3080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803580: nmu: mahimahi_0.91-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803580,
regarding nmu: mahimahi_0.91-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu mahimahi_0.91-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libprotobuf9v5."
Maintainer uploaded binaries were built against libprotobuf9.
Andreas
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:22:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 00:02 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > > If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE
On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 00:02 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE to try to do
> > > beyond what I've just reported now, let me know.
> >
On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 11:52 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:22:52PM +1000, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Is the policy for what gets included in the stable branches described
> > somewhere?
>
> It's documented at:
> https://www.openssl.org/about/releasestrat.html
>
> > What kin
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:18:31 +0100
with message-id <5634cdb7.2000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#795543: nmu: google-glog and autofdo
has caused the Debian Bug report #795543,
regarding nmu: google-glog and autofdo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:07:58 +0100
with message-id <5634cb3e.9060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#798198: nmu: psi4_4.0~beta5+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #798198,
regarding nmu: psi4_4.0~beta5+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:05:26 +0100
with message-id <5634caa6.2080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#799564: nmu: visp_2.10.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #799564,
regarding nmu: visp_2.10.0+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:03:22 +0100
with message-id <5634ca2a.9000...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#797031: nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #797031,
regarding nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
I would like to fix 803562 in jessie. Exim's MIME checking ACL
(available in exim4-daemon-heavy) was found to not correctly handle
some broken MIME containers. Jessie contai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 792779 with 790978
Bug #792779 [release.debian.org] nmu: android-platform-frameworks-base_21-2
792779 was not blocked by any bugs.
792779 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 792779: 790978
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #798999 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort }
[release.debian.org] transition: python3.5 supported
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #798999 to the same values
previously set
--
798999: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Control: reopen -1
I thought the binNMU requests were in a separate bug, didn't realise I was
closing the python transition one. Reopening.
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:35:41 +0100
with message-id <5634b59d.7070...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803551: nmu: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #803551,
regarding nmu: fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:36:53 +0100
with message-id <5634b5e5.8020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#798999: transition: python3.5 supported
has caused the Debian Bug report #798999,
regarding transition: python3.5 supported
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Followup-For: Bug #798999
A few binNMUs for experimental:
nmu libselinux_2.4-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with python3.5 as a
supported python3."
nmu libguestfs_1:1.29.50-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with python3.5 as
a supported python3."
nmu python-apt_1.1.0~alpha3 . ANY . exp
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu fcitx-sunpinyin_0.4.1-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
libsunpinyin3v5."
let's finish the transition in experimental, too.
Andreas
Your message dated Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:15:44 +0100
with message-id <5634a2e0.80...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#803435: nmu: akonadi_15.08.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803435,
regarding nmu: akonadi_15.08.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
47 matches
Mail list logo