Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

2016-03-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
-boot? On 2016-02-21 12:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD team seem happy to try it again. Some suggested dates: March 12th / 13th March 19th / 20th

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt25-1_mips.changes ACCEPT

Bug#816243: jessie-pu: package subversion/1.8.10-6+deb8u3

2016-03-09 Thread James McCoy
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 09:38:23PM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > I'd like to propose the following update (+ s/UNRELEASED/jessie/) to fix a > crash when running svn and using kwallet to store credentials. Ping. > $ debdiff subversion_1.8.10-6+deb8u{2,3}.dsc > diffstat for

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt25-1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

Bug#817003: transition: glibc

2016-03-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/03/16 13:46, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Many architectures will be binNMUd against libc6 2.22, but please on > > kfreebsd-* could you binNMU these packages against libc0.1 2.22 instead: > > > > * p11-kit (breaks sid at the moment) > > * libnss-db > >

Bug#816891: jessie-pu: package espeakup/1:0.71-19

2016-03-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, It is now uploaded. Samuel

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.78-1_mips.changes ACCEPT

Re: Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

2016-03-09 Thread Christian Seiler
On 03/09/2016 08:14 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The footer of every mail should say exactly that. Yes, unfortunately I read that only after I sent my mail - I had previously thought Britney would run only once a day. Had the package migrated only today and the email had been immediate, I

Re: Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

2016-03-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 18:24 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Christian Seiler: > > Hi again, > > > >> - I didn't get notified that open-iscsi migrated to testing yesterday. > > > > Great, I have the worst luck w.r.t. timing, just as a I sent the email I > > got the notification. :/ > > > >> sorry

Bug#815919: marked as done (nmu: gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-2 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12)

2016-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:04:13 +0100 with message-id <56e073ad.40...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#815919: nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-3 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-1 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #815919, regarding nmu:

Processed: Re: nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-3 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-1 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12

2016-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 nmu: gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-2 > sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12 Bug #815919 [release.debian.org] nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-4 openalpr_2.2.3-1 Changed Bug title to 'nmu: gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-2 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12' from

Bug#815919: nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-3 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-1 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: retitle -1 nmu: gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-2 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12 On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:50:49 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > The ABI change has been reverted and the transition to > libtesseract4 has to be undone (#815056). tesseract and openalpr

Bug#815919: nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-3 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-1 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12

2016-03-09 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
retitle 815919 nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-4 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-2 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12 thanks There are some good reasons to do this sooner rather than later.

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#815919: nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-3 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-1 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12

2016-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 815919 nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-4 openalpr_2.2.3-1 Bug #815919 [release.debian.org] nmu: tesseract_3.04.01-3 openalpr_2.2.3-1 gimagereader_3.1.2+git368fa8f-2 sikuli_1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-12 Changed Bug title to 'nmu:

Re: Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

2016-03-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Christian Seiler: > Hi again, > >> - I didn't get notified that open-iscsi migrated to testing yesterday. > > Great, I have the worst luck w.r.t. timing, just as a I sent the email I > got the notification. :/ > >> sorry for the noise. > > Regards, > Christian > Indeed :) Britney runs

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.78-1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

Re: Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

2016-03-09 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi again, > - I didn't get notified that open-iscsi migrated to testing yesterday. Great, I have the worst luck w.r.t. timing, just as a I sent the email I got the notification. :/ > sorry for the noise. Regards, Christian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

2016-03-09 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear release team, Britney seems to have stopped in sending notifications about testing migrations to package maintainers: - I didn't get notified that open-iscsi migrated to testing yesterday. - The package tracker [1] doesn't have an entry for that either. I also checked that if I look at

Bug#817258: wheezy-pu: package privoxy/3.0.19-2+deb7u4

2016-03-09 Thread Roland Rosenfeld 
Just after sending this out I noticed, that I wrote "stable" instead
of "oldstable" to the changelog.  Here's a fixed patch.

Tscho

Roland

diff -Nru privoxy-3.0.19/debian/changelog privoxy-3.0.19/debian/changelog
--- privoxy-3.0.19/debian/changelog	2016-01-22

Bug#817258: wheezy-pu: package privoxy/3.0.19-2+deb7u4

2016-03-09 Thread Roland Rosenfeld 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

I prepared a patch against privoxy 3.0.19-2+deb7u3, which closes the
CVE-2013-2503, see

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I dont think doing thousands of sourceful uploads is realistic nor useful Now that we have source-only uploads, it should be fairly easy to do on a fast network. Just a for loop around apt-get source, dch, debuild -S, debsign, dupload. --

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt25-1_armel.changes ACCEPT

Bug#817184: transition: sndio

2016-03-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi >Please go ahead. done a few seconds ago. thanks for the quick answer! Please hold on libsdl2, the fix is already on deferred/2 (for the RC bug), and I would like if possible to avoid an useless binNMU :) cheers, Gianfranco

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 10:32:08 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 24/02/16 22:16, Niels Thykier wrote: > > >- Possible lack of buildd resources to do the rebuild. Notably, due > > > to Multi-Arch:same we would generally

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.78-1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: linux_3.2.78-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.16.7-ckt25-1_armhf.changes ACCEPT

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:10:38 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 9. März 2016, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Most source packages that build both arch:all and arch-dependent > > packages will be affected, I believe. Enough that for all practical > > purposes, an arch:all binNMU

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 9. März 2016, Julien Cristau wrote: > Most source packages that build both arch:all and arch-dependent > packages will be affected, I believe. Enough that for all practical > purposes, an arch:all binNMU means making things uninstallable, so is a > big no-no. IOW: if a source

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:24:44 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On the arch:all rebuild-ability > > === > > > > Rebuilding arch:all packages currently requires manual uploads of all > > packages. While we have "arch:all" buildds, we do *not* have support > > for

Bug#817184: transition: sndio

2016-03-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 08/03/16 20:19, Peter Piwowarski wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > libsndio has undergone a minor SONAME bump in the latest release; there is > however no consequential

Processed: Re: Bug#817184: transition: sndio

2016-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #817184 [release.debian.org] transition: sndio Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 817184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817184 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 24/02/16 22:16, Niels Thykier wrote: > >- Possible lack of buildd resources to do the rebuild. Notably, due > > to Multi-Arch:same we would generally need to do the rebuild on all > > architectures. > FWIW, that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Reproducible] On making Stretch self-contained IRT to reproducibility

2016-03-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016, Niels Thykier wrote: > The topic of rebuilding all of Stretch to make it self-contained (IRT to > reproducibility) was brought up on the release IRC meeting today (topic > originally proposed in [1]). The highlights: > * To my knowledge, only people from the

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2016-03-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.78-1_i386.changes ACCEPT