Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2016 00:19:29 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#824887: transition: gl2ps
has caused the Debian Bug report #824887,
regarding transition: gl2ps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 2016-06-05 23:10 +0100, peter green wrote:
> On 05/06/16 23:01, Wookey wrote:
> >>Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures?
> Thats what it looks like to me.
> >And I think we are building armhf on the arm64 build machines too?
> I don't think so. At least I see no evidence of
On 2016-06-05 14:46 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > [0]: I'd define core packages as everything needed to install, boot, and
> > then build packages on that arch. The rebootstrap project gives us some
> > idea of what those are; but add to that the kernel and any bootloaders.
> > Being able to
On 05/06/16 23:01, Wookey wrote:
Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures?
Thats what it looks like to me.
And I think we are building armhf on the arm64 build machines too?
I don't think so. At least I see no evidence of it on buildd.debian.org .
On 2016-06-05 13:38 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> peter green:
> > On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> all arm ports have DSA concerns.
> >>
> > Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still
> > a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the
* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) [160605 22:45]:
> In other words, there is a DSA buildd?
>
> I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds:
>
> * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01,
>mipsel-manda-02
>- I presume none of them are DSA
YunQiang Su:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>> AFAICT, we are still missing:
>>
>> * A rebuild of the last package [mipsel64import]
>
> This is a bug of gcc, and the gcc team in IMG is working on it.
> It also effects lua.
>
Thanks for the
On 2016-06-05 10:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters.
>
> While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with
> the architecture qualifications.
>
> For starters, here are the architectures we are aware of:
[ snip ]
> * mips64el (NEW)
On 03/06/16 14:28, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> [Please Cc me; I'm not subscribed]
>
> Dear release team,
>
> similarly to the circlator case described in [1], I am currently facing
> a new package (ariba [2]) that currently wouldn't transition to testing
> because of missing i386 dependencies:
>
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.63-1~deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.63-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.79-1~deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Le 5/06/2016 à 19:20, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> This was uploaded after the window for the 8.5 point release closed and
> has now been flagged for acceptance.
That's perfect, thank you.
Emmanuel Bourg
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 18:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:55 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I'd like to fix the bug #795356 reported against JMeter. We basically forgot
> > to install 11 XML files and a DTD
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #824658 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package jakarta-jmeter/2.11-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
824658: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824658
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #826443 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
826443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826443
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 01:45 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> I'd like to upload fix for
>
> CVE-2016-4338 / ZBX-10741: mysql.size shell command injection
> in zabbix-agent (Closes: #823329).
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 zabbix
Dear release team,
I'd like to upload fix for
CVE-2016-4338 / ZBX-10741: mysql.size shell command injection
in zabbix-agent (Closes: #823329).
Diff
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 zabbix
Bug #826443 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1
Added indication that 826443 affects zabbix
--
826443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826443
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Please let us know when those issues get sorted out.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emilio
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a friendly reminder that we have not heard
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #826429 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
826429: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 15:56 +0200, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
> A security issue was found in quassel-core (CVE-2016-4414), allowing an
> unauthenticated remote client to cause a denial of service.
> Given the fact that Quassel isn't widely used in the client/server
Steven Chamberlain:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state
>> in Debian.
>> We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox,
>> Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear all,
A security issue was found in quassel-core (CVE-2016-4414), allowing an
unauthenticated remote client to cause a denial of service.
Given the fact that Quassel isn't
peter green:
> On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> all arm ports have DSA concerns.
>>
> Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still
> a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the topic
> said it was "being worked on", sledge whats the
Hi,
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 13:26 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> sh4:
>
>
> The two biggest issues with sh4 are currently with binutils and the
> kernel. binutils has problems when building Qt5:
>
There is in fact another big elephant in the room, which I have
mentioned several
I intend to upload linux version 4.6.1-1 on Monday. This is a new
upstream version, which of course means an ABI change.
Aside from that, the highlights are:
- Added userland packages for mipsn32, mipsn32el and tilegx
- Rewrote maintainer scripts, removing little-used features and fixing
some
thanks to everyone explaining arch:any to me :)
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
all arm ports have DSA concerns.
Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still
a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the topic
said it was "being worked on", sledge whats the status here?) are there
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state in
> Debian.
> We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox,
> Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name the most important ones.
Is there
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> Hi Niels!
>
> On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch.
>>
>> I kindly ask you to:
>>
>> * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch.
>
> To give some insight what's
On 05/06/16 13:00, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
ppc64:
This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have
over
11.000 packages installed
[...]
sparc64:
We are close to 11.000
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> ppc64:
>>
>> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We
>> have over
>> 11.000 packages installed
> [...]
>> sparc64:
>> We are close to
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm not sure whether you are talking about source or binary packages but
> sid/amd64 has over 24000 source packages and over 5 binary packages,
> so I would call the above "on par". Or what am I missing?
There are just around 12,000 source
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> ppc64:
>
> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have
> over
> 11.000 packages installed
[...]
> sparc64:
> We are close to 11.000 installed packages.
I'm not sure whether you are
Hi Niels!
On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch.
>
> I kindly ask you to:
>
> * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch.
To give some insight what's happening in Debian Ports. We have two
Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters.
While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with
the architecture qualifications.
For starters, here are the architectures we are aware of:
* amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
s390x
-
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Please let us know when those issues get sorted out.
>
> Cheers,
> Emilio
>
Hi,
Just a friendly reminder that we have not heard from you on this topic.
AFAICT, we are still missing:
* A rebuild of the last
36 matches
Mail list logo