I know there are still powerpc users who run Debian. I am one of them and
love to see it continue. How can I help?
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Hector Oron wrote:
> [Add to CC debian-wb-team@ and r...@debian.org]
>
> Hello,
>
> 2016-06-05 12:01 GMT+02:00
[Add to CC debian-wb-team@ and r...@debian.org]
Hello,
2016-06-05 12:01 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier :
> Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters.
>
> While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with
> the architecture qualifications.
Excellent! Thanks
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016, at 18:37, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> There is openmainframe project https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ ,
> which I believe offers access to z/VM instances hosted by Marist
> colledge.
>
> At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> joined with
On 15/06/16 20:15, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On miércoles, 15 de junio de 2016 7:05:33 P. M. ART Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Here it is:
>>
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtdeclarative-abi-5-6-0.html
>
> Right, we only have analitza, qt3d is
On miércoles, 15 de junio de 2016 7:05:33 P. M. ART Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
[snip]
> Here it is:
>
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtdeclarative-abi-5-6-0.html
Right, we only have analitza, qt3d is going away and gammaray is already
binNMUed.
Please binNMU analitza then
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:09:42 +0200
with message-id <40912327-3f12-736e-3830-873061eb4...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#827275: release.debian.org: hint pixbros back into
testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #827275,
regarding release.debian.org: hint pixbros back into
On 15/06/16 17:12, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi! I'm afraid we found there was another ABI bump which probably hit
> a wrongly-marked private symbol in the symbols files.
>
> Can you please either add a new tracker like this?
>
> Affected: .depends ~ /qtdeclarative-abi-5-5-0/
Hi! I'm afraid we found there was another ABI bump which probably hit
a wrongly-marked private symbol in the symbols files.
Can you please either add a new tracker like this?
Affected: .depends ~ /qtdeclarative-abi-5-5-0/ | .depends ~
/qtdeclarative-abi-5-6-0/
Good: .depends ~
Hi,
Le 15/06/2016 à 03:56, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
> - php-guzzle - seems fixed to me, but dak still wants to remove the
> package
Code is PHP5-specific, it’s superseded by php-guzzlehttp. None of them
should be released in Stretch, so it’s perfectly fine to see it go away.
Regards
David
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
On my Debian Jessie machine, I would like to fix a security problem with
automake-1.14 that show up the debsecan report, see
Dear maintainers,
in an effort to finally finish PHP 7.0 transition started in April, I
removed PHP bindings from swig as it doesn't look like swig will support
PHP 7.0 anytime soon and also from the remaining packages using swig to
build PHP bindings.
I uploaded these fixed packages to
Здравствуйте!
Меня зовут Дмитрий. Я - мастер по настилу бетонных полов. Работаю с 2-мя
подручными.
Имею за плечами большой опыт работы. Кроме того могу похвалиться большим
количеством благодарных клиентов.
Сейчас я снова ищу заказы.
Мои услуги стоят недорого.
Делаю все качественно и в краткие
Just re-checked libkolab* and it's same as with redland-binding, just
php-kolab and php-kolabxml binary packages needs to be removed and they
have no r-deps.
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Knot Resolver
Your message dated Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:06:57 +0200
with message-id <5387f468-9b11-6329-5c9d-c65386653...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#827344: nmu: sogo_2.2.17a-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #827344,
regarding nmu: sogo_2.2.17a-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 15/06/16 08:50, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I'm filing this bug for a transition of octomap. It is
> in
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #827341 [release.debian.org] transition: octomap
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
827341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827341
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Sure.
TL;DR
libkolab and libkolabxml needs to be resolved with KDE team.
Longer version:
The transition is almost complete, but there are few remaining packages
that are stuck because of swig, where upstream is dormant on the issue:
https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/571
Broken due swig are:
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
the binNMU there picked up libgnutls-deb0-28, so it needs another one.
nmu sogo_2.2.17a-1.1 . hurd-i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30"
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I'm filing this bug for a transition of octomap. It is
in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built
previously.
Ben file:
title =
19 matches
Mail list logo