Bug#838693: nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1

2016-09-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1 . amd64 . wheezy-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean wheezy environment." this was not built in wheezy ... libteam5 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) but

Bug#838692: nmu: nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1

2016-09-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu nlopt_2.4.2+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 . amd64 . wheezy-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean wheezy environment." it's currently uninstallable in wheezy-backports: libnlopt0 : Depends: libc6 (>=

Bug#838673: nmu: slurm-llnl_16.05.2-1

2016-09-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu slurm-llnl_16.05.2-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librrd8." Maintainer upload was built against librrd4. Andreas

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-09-23 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/23/2016 03:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > No, you are not maintaining powerpcspe as a release architecture, and that's > something different than building packages for some of the ports > architectures. > If you can get powerpcspe accepted as a release architecture, then maybe you > gain

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-09-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker) > > I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already > maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc. No, you are not

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 23/09/16 11:40, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> >>> Control: tags -1 confirmed >>> >>> Hi Dom! >>> >>> On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-23 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > Hi Dom! > > > > On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic

Processed: Re: Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model

2016-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 transition: ros-ros-comm Bug #838625 [release.debian.org] transition: ros-robot-model Changed Bug title to 'transition: ros-ros-comm' from 'transition: ros-robot-model'. -- 838625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838625 Debian Bug

Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model

2016-09-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: retitle -1 transition: ros-ros-comm On 23/09/16 09:21, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > retitle -1 transition: ros-ros-comm > > sorry, I accidentally wrote the wrong package name. Hope it's still ok. Yes. Emilio

Bug#830200: transition: perl

2016-09-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Hi Dom! > > On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:13:04AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:

Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model

2016-09-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 23/09/16 08:54, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > librosbag got a small ABI change I would like to do a transition for. Go ahead. Emilio

Processed: Re: Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model

2016-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #838625 [release.debian.org] transition: ros-robot-model Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 838625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838625 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#838625: transition: ros-robot-model

2016-09-23 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, librosbag got a small ABI change I would like to do a transition for. Cheers Jochen Ben file: title = "ros-robot-model"; is_affected = .depends ~ "librosbag1d" | .depends ~