Bug#847830: unblock: diaspora/0.6.0.0+debian-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package diaspora. Fixes grave functionality bugs (breaks user interface, core functionality. All buttons and drop downs broken, cannot post anything.) #846916 It is also

Bug#847828: unblock: jqueryui/1.12.1+dfsg-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package jqueryui. This fixes grave bug #847353 (breaks core functionality/user interface of gitlab and diaspora) Please also unblock diaspora debdiff attached unblock

Bug#847827: unblock: ruby-jquery-ui-rails/6.0.1-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package ruby-jquery-ui-rails Last update of libjs-jquery-ui introduced a breaking change which introduced grave bugs in diaspora and gitlab (#846961). This update adapts

Bug#847826: Subject: unblock: gitlab/8.13.6+dfsg1-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package gitlab This update fixes security bug #847157 and adapts gitlab for new ruby-jquery-ui-rails #846961 (which is a grave bug - user interface is broken, many core

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hello, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:03:04PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2016-11-16 12:26, Ian Jackson wrote: > > In the absence of input from the openssl maintainers, I would like to > > ask the Release Team's opinion. > > > > If we are going to wind back on this change we should do it

Re: Release impact of introducing a new archive section?

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 14518 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote: > >> (my first thought was a canonical online location, but these tools may > >> not want that at runtime and can't rely on it at build time, but maybe > >> that should be the source used for

Re: Release impact of introducing a new archive section?

On 14518 March 1977, Josh Triplett wrote: >> (my first thought was a canonical online location, but these tools may >> not want that at runtime and can't rely on it at build time, but maybe >> that should be the source used for the package) > Packaging this data (section names, short descriptions,

Re: Release impact of introducing a new archive section?

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 09:45:36AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 21:39 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I've now written and submitted all of these patches. > > Might it be useful to have this list of names and descriptions in some > canonical packaged location, such that

Bug#847767: nmu: efl_1.18.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu efl_1.18.1-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against bullet 2.83.7" there was a transition in sid recently ... Andreas

Bug#847763: nmu: xtell_2.10.8

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu xtell_2.10.8 . i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against readline7." Maintainer upload was built against readline6. Andreas

Bug#847587: unblock diaspora and ruby-jquery-rails

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 22:07:51 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > package: release.debian.org > > ruby-jquery-rails 4.2.1-2 fixes grave bug #846916 (which affects > diaspora) and diaspora 0.6.0.0+debian-6 drops patches to use > ruby-jquery-rails 4.2.1-2 > The core functionality is

Processed: withdrawing unblock requests

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was prav...@debian.org). > usertags 847725 + unblock Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: unblock. > usertags 847639 + unblock There were no

Bug#847725: marked as done (unblock node-extend-shallow 2.0.1-3)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:52:10 +0100 with message-id <6f7ea788-9211-1143-b0f1-92efe54aa...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#847725: unblock node-extend-shallow 2.0.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #847725, regarding unblock node-extend-shallow 2.0.1-3 to be marked as done.

Bug#847724: marked as done (unblock node-repeat-element 1.1.2+github-2)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:50:58 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#847724: unblock node-repeat-element 1.1.2+github-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847724, regarding unblock node-repeat-element 1.1.2+github-2 to be

Bug#847726: marked as done (unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:17:54 +0530 with message-id <78d8db43-aed8-2504-06fd-5d7f6d8c7...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#847726: unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847726, regarding unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2 to be marked as done.

Bug#847636: marked as done (unblock node-cpr)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:13:54 +0530 with message-id and subject line since FTBFS is not severe, withdrawing unblock request has caused the Debian Bug report #847636, regarding unblock node-cpr to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#847726: unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 16:55 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 11 4:05:41 PM IST, "Adam D. Barratt" > wrote: > >On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 10:24 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> package: release.debian.org > > > >*Please* use the correct metadata here. > > >

Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr

On ഞായര്‍ 11 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 04:59 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Like my previous reply. Won't FTBFS be considered as affecting the > package, then it needs to be documented. The announcement said "Should your upload to unstable include security fixes or fixes for severe bugs, we file an unblock

Bug#847636: Re: unblock node-cpr

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 10 10:47:01 PM IST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: ># bcc to control@ >user release.debian@packages.debian.org >usertags 847636 + unblock >tags 847636 + moreinfo > >On Sat, 2016-12-10 at 10:45 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> package: release-debian.org >

Bug#847726: unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2

On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 11 4:05:41 PM IST, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: >On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 10:24 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> package: release.debian.org > >*Please* use the correct metadata here. > >> Fixes RC bug #846743 (causes gitlab to be marked for autoremoval) >

Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 846692, tagging 846692, usertagging 847726 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 846692 - unblock Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: . > tags 846692 - moreinfo Bug #846692

Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 846692, tagging 846692, usertagging 847725 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 846692 + unblock There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: unblock. > tags 846692 + moreinfo Bug

Bug#847726: unblock node-normalize-path 2.0.1-2

On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 10:24 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > package: release.debian.org *Please* use the correct metadata here. > Fixes RC bug #846743 (causes gitlab to be marked for autoremoval) While this is true, the auto-removal date is in over a month from now. On that basis, and given that

Re: Release impact of introducing a new archive section?

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 21:39 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > I've now written and submitted all of these patches. Might it be useful to have this list of names and descriptions in some canonical packaged location, such that updating these tools is just a version bump on a build dep, or even a