Why is tk8.4 removal triggering autoremoval messages of not depending packages at this point in time (Was: staden is marked for autoremoval from testing)

2016-12-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 04:40:32AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > staden 2.0.0+b11-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-01-29 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 734837: tk8.4: Time to remove from testing Staden Build-Depends: tk-dev

Bug#849796: unblock: libphp-phpmailer/(5.2.14+dfsg-2.1

2016-12-30 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Please unblock package libphp-phpmailer/lower the age it needs to transition to testing. libphp-phpmailer as uploaded by Thijs fixes a vulnerability CVE-2016-10033 (and making sure tha

Re: Wondering about possibility of removing emacs24 from stretch

2016-12-30 Thread Rob Browning
At this point, I think we're ready to proceed if the release team approves. The short answer is that there doesn't appear to be much difficulty, much risk, or much work required. We'd need to change a few package dependencies and change emacs-defaults to pull in emacs25 instead of emacs24.

Re: BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-30 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 04:47:30PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > In the meanwhile, I see that something changed on the BTS side. > But something still appears to be wrong. The RC bug count page [1] > claims > > Number concerning the current stable release: 597 > Number concerning the next

Bug#849218: transition: imagemagick

2016-12-30 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le 29 décembre 2016 16:37:43 GMT+01:00, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >Control: tags -1 confirmed > >On 23/12/16 18:54, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> >> Hi, >> >> Due to #846385 could be possible to get transition for

Re: Bug#746005: Problems in Lilipond and Guile -- #746005

2016-12-30 Thread Dr. Tobias Quathamer
Am 30.12.2016 um 07:28 schrieb Marc Dequènes (duck): Quack, I think the release team should have been involved much much earlier. Hi, the release team has been involved, see Emilio's mail from April 2015: About a year later,

Re: BTS lost most of its version tracking data!

2016-12-30 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 16:40:39 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/12/16 16:34, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > As of now, the RC bug count page [1] claims > > > > Number concerning the current stable release: 24 > > Number concerning the next release: 25 > > > > which is obviously

Re: bup 0.29 in stretch

2016-12-30 Thread Rob Browning
Niels Thykier writes: > The bup 0.29 release is unaffected by the soft freeze as bup is already > in testing at this time. As long as you upload in time and ensures it > migrates before 5th of February, it will make it for stretch. Oh, that's great, and sorry for the

Bug#844264: release.debian.org: Please clarify "Packages must autobuild without failure"

2016-12-30 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 07:31:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Thanks for your interest in this subject and for wanting to increase the > stability of builds in Debian. > > As Julien mentioned earlier, build failures are sadly not as black and > white as one might want them to be. Especially