[TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

I heard back from doko today. We can expect a reply tomorrow. We also talked briefly about the issue. Realistically, i cannot imagine the TC coming to any final decision on something like this in under three weeks. That timeline seems fairly aggressive actually. However, I think the TC could

Bug#851105: jessie-pu: package ndoutils/1.4b9-1.1+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu ndoutils is one of two packages remaining in the archive that use ucf unconditionally during postrm purge, causing piuparts failures. Since the package has been removed after

Bug#851102: unblock: petsc/3.7.5+dfsg1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package petsc Upstream has just released patch version 3.7.5, fixing various bugs. The ABI remains the same 3.7 (SONAMEs libpetsc_real.so.3.7 and libpetsc_complex.so.3.7)

Processed: split alpine bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 828231 -1 Bug #828231 {Done: Asheesh Laroia } [src:alpine] alpine: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Bug 828231 cloned as bug 851054 827061 was blocked by: 828362 828538 828336 828419 828550 828492 828246 829452 828454 828616

Re: Bug#851018: dpmb: FTBFS: a2x: ERROR: missing configuration file: /etc/asciidoc/dblatex/asciidoc-dblatex.xsl

Hi Lucas, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. I actually expected this. This is due to the fix for https://bugs.debian.org/850301 in asciidoc — IMHO such transitions (neither the one in 8.6.9-4 c.f. #850305 nor the one in

Bug#850830: marked as done (jessie-pu: package ikiwiki/3.20141016.4)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:19:27 + with message-id <2017091927.kdzfpxtupv37n...@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk> and subject line Re: jessie-pu: package ikiwiki/3.20141016.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #850830, regarding jessie-pu: package ikiwiki/3.20141016.4 to be marked as

Re: Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 16:56:05 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Hi. > I'd really appreciate comments from debian-release on this issue. > Would debian-release like us to take this up? > If so, I have a proposal for how to fast-track this situation, but I am > only comfortable doing that if the

Re: removal of src:courier *now* probably a diservice to our users

Hi Ondřej, On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:38:52PM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > the courier packages are therefore your responsibility and I am going to > forward you all the hate mail I might. ok, please do! :) > Just make sure that courier, courier-authlib and courier-unicode migrate, so > the

Bug#850950: marked as done (unblock: debian-design/3.0.4)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2017 17:38:00 + with message-id <002e9332-6296-666a-e52d-a7568b671...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#850950: unblock: debian-design/3.0.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #850950, regarding unblock: debian-design/3.0.4 to be marked as done. This means

Fwd: removal of src:courier *now* probably a diservice to our users

Forwarding to correct address of release team. My response is in the related bug. O. --- Forwarded message --- From: Holger Levsen Date: 11 January 2017 18:09:43 Subject: removal of src:courier *now* probably a diservice to our users To: 848...@bugs.debian.org, Ondřej

Bug#850950: unblock: debian-design/3.0.4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-design (I'm speaking with my piuparts hat on, I have no interest in debian-design (nor do I know what that package is good for ...)) debian-design seems to

Bug#850819: unblock: heat/1:7.0.0-2

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:42:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Thomas Goirand: > > unblock heat/1:7.0.0-2 > Already aged to 5 days. That will also need a ignore-piuparts heat/1:7.0.0-2 thanks to python-sqlalchemy making python-heat uninstallable in sid ...

Re: News of imagemagick

On 01/10/2017 11:20 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > Hi, > > What are the news of imagemagick transition? > > I plan to upload a new version fixing four security bugs and I believe > I should wait the end of transition. > > Thanks for the work BTW. > Please keep discussion of that transition to

Re: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug

I would like to mention that in my previous mail I forgot another possible fix for this bug: going back to binutils 2.27. The current uploads are snapshots of the next version, 2.28, and whereas the bug in question seems to habe been there all the time it started to affect us since a commit in

Bug#850482: marked as done (nmu: ardour_1:5.5.0~dfsg-1)

Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:15:09 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#850482: nmu: ardour_1:5.5.0~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #850482, regarding nmu: ardour_1:5.5.0~dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#850931: jessie-pu: package mongodb/1:2.4.10-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear SRMs, I would like to update MongoDB in stable to fix two low-impact security issues: - CVE-2016-6494[1] is fixed by backporting the patch already applied to 2.6 (once

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u4+b2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u4+b2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u4+b2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: