Processed: Re: Bug#860310: unblock pre-apptoval request for yade/2017.01a-8

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 860310 -moreinfo Bug #860310 [release.debian.org] unblock pre-apptoval request for yade/2017.01a-8 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 860310:

Bug#860310: unblock pre-apptoval request for yade/2017.01a-8

tags 860310 -moreinfo thanks Hi Niels, yade_2017.01a-8 has been succesfully built on all relevant release platforms [1]. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=yade Best regards Anton 2017-04-17 13:07 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier : > Ack, please go ahead and let us

Bug#860600: release.debian.org: Please unblock openlp

Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Hello Release Team, I would like to file an unblock request for the openlp package. The openlp package currently is queued for removal from stretch due to a dependency being removed from stretch. Please see bug #734101. In order to do this, I

Bug#860593: unblock: reportbug/7.1.6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package reportbug This upload fixes 2 crashes (one of which pinged by a RT member) unblock reportbug/7.1.6 -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers

update for release notes

Tried to commit this directly, but permission problems. I guess I don't have write access? Index: en/whats-new.dbk === --- en/whats-new.dbk(revision 11433) +++ en/whats-new.dbk(working copy) @@ -396,23 +396,22 @@ CDs,

Bug#860589: unblock: pyvirtualdisplay/0.2.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pyvirtualdisplay The last upload add 2 dependencies, needed to be able to use pyvirtualdisplay (without any of them, arguably xvfb the most important, so in depends,

Bug#860389: unblock: dhcpdump/1.8-2.1 (pre-approval)

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Niels, 2017-04-18 10:39 Niels Thykier: Please go ahead and let me know once it has been built successfully in unstable on all relevant release architectures. Thanks. It has built successfully on all arches, -ports included, except sh4 (not attempted yet,

Processed: Re: Bug#860389: unblock: dhcpdump/1.8-2.1 (pre-approval)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #860389 [release.debian.org] unblock: dhcpdump/1.8-2.1 (pre-approval) Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 860389: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860389 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#860586: unblock: aptitude/0.8.7-1 (pre-approval)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello, I know that we're very late in the preparation of the release, but still I submit this for your consideration. I am quite happy with aptitude as it is now in stretch, but still I

Bug#860577: jessie-pu: package sus/7.20161013~deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu sus is a downloader package in contrib. The download URL+checksum for susv4 has changed ... rendering the package uninstallable. This is a backport of the package in sid with the

Bug#860573: unblock: php-horde-imp/6.2.17-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package php-horde-imp This is to fix "sending email after attch_body_check hook fails" (#859048). Debdiff is attached. unblock php-horde-imp/6.2.17-2 -- System

Bug#860562: unblock: gnome-paint/0.4.0-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gnome-paint Gnome-paint 0.4.0-5 fixes a startup segmentation fault (RC Bug #860233) found after PIE massive rebuild version 0.4.0-4+b1 in Stretch. We have tested to

2X Users

Hi, We provide custom built contact lists, of Chiefs, Directors and Influencers of Companies using various Business Software as CRM, ERP, Analytics, PLM, Accounting Software, Cloud Computing, Collaborative Software, and many more. We can customize the lists according to the requirements like

[SUA 118-1] Updated libdatetime-timezone-perl version

Maj appliquée. Le 15/04/2017 à 21:47, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : --- Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 118-1 http://www.debian.org debian-release@lists.debian.org gregor herrmann April 15th,

Bug#859794: unblock: salt/2016.11.2+ds-1

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2017, 08:19 + schrieb Niels Thykier: > Moritz Muehlenhoff: > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:48:50PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: unblock > > >

Bug#860528: marked as done (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:43:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#860528: Acknowledgement (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1) has caused the Debian Bug report #860528, regarding nmu: libev_1:4.22-1 to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: Bug#860521: [pkg-horde] Bug#860521: unblock: php-horde-core/2.27.6+debian1-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #860521 [release.debian.org] unblock: php-horde-core/2.27.6+debian1-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 860521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860521 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#860521: [pkg-horde] Bug#860521: unblock: php-horde-core/2.27.6+debian1-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Mathieu Parent (Debian): > 2017-04-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Parent : > [...] >> [...] and prevent all >> Horde to be removed from stretch because of jquery-mobile removal (See >> #734101). > > I'm a bit afraid because they are "Marked for

Bug#860528: Acknowledgement (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1)

2017-04-18 11:32 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt : > On 2017-04-18 10:15, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >> My mistake, i meant to ask a binNMU in testing/unstable >> >> nmu libev_1:4.22-1 . ANY . stretch . -m "Rebuild to Close #860301" > > > For a rebuild in unstable, that's still

Bug#860528: Acknowledgement (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1)

On 2017-04-18 10:15, Jérémy Lal wrote: My mistake, i meant to ask a binNMU in testing/unstable nmu libev_1:4.22-1 . ANY . stretch . -m "Rebuild to Close #860301" For a rebuild in unstable, that's still wrong, I'm afraid - just drop the " . stretch", as unstable is the default. Regards,

Bug#860528: Acknowledgement (nmu: libev_1:4.22-1)

My mistake, i meant to ask a binNMU in testing/unstable nmu libev_1:4.22-1 . ANY . stretch . -m "Rebuild to Close #860301"

Bug#860528: nmu: libev_1:4.22-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libev_1:4.22-1 . ANY . jessie . -m "Rebuild to Close #860301" I don't really understand what's going on... bug reporter says it's fixed when rebuilt. So let's rebuild ! -- System

Processed: Re: Bug#860389: unblock: dhcpdump/1.8-2.1 (pre-approval)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #860389 [release.debian.org] unblock: dhcpdump/1.8-2.1 (pre-approval) Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed. -- 860389: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860389 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#860389: unblock: dhcpdump/1.8-2.1 (pre-approval)

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hello, > > I uploaded an NMU of the dhcpdump package to experimental, with the following > changes that had

Bug#860371: marked as done (unblock: sysstat/11.4.3-1)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:37:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#860371: unblock: sysstat/11.4.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #860371, regarding unblock: sysstat/11.4.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: Remove all leaf node-* packages (and libjs-* too) from testing ?

2017-04-18 10:09 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier : > Jérémy Lal: >> To be more precise the question should be: >> >> Remove all leaf node-* packages AND not installing an executable in >> /usr/(s)bin/ >> AND not depending on node-gyp. >> >> Because a nodejs module in debian falls in

Bug#859794: unblock: salt/2016.11.2+ds-1

Moritz Muehlenhoff: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:48:50PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Please unblock package salt >> >> 2016.11.2 is a bug-fix release for the 2016.11

Bug#858124: marked as done (RM: npm/1.4.21+ds-3)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:12:00 + with message-id <4c401f02-bf08-e629-3a52-76d3f221f...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#858124: RM: npm/1.4.21+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #858124, regarding RM: npm/1.4.21+ds-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#859599: unblock: qemu/1:2.8+dfsg-4

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Michael Tokarev: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package qemu > > Upstream released a new stable/bugfix version which > includes many changes we already had

Processed: Re: Bug#859599: unblock: qemu/1:2.8+dfsg-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #859599 [release.debian.org] unblock: qemu/1:2.8+dfsg-4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 859599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859599 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Remove all leaf node-* packages (and libjs-* too) from testing ?

Jérémy Lal: > To be more precise the question should be: > > Remove all leaf node-* packages AND not installing an executable in > /usr/(s)bin/ > AND not depending on node-gyp. > > Because a nodejs module in debian falls in these categories: > - needed by another module > - needed by an

Bug#860448: unblock: (pre-approval) openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-4

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Ryan Tandy: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > This is a pre-approval request since I have a few more changes queued > than just the RC bug fix. I will be happy to revert any

Processed: Re: Bug#860448: unblock: (pre-approval) openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #860448 [release.debian.org] unblock: (pre-approval) openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-4 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 860448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860448 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#860022: marked as done (unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20160123cvs-3.1 (pre-approval))

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:23:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#860022: Bug#859935: Bug#860022: unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20160123cvs-3.1 (pre-approval) has caused the Debian Bug report #860022, regarding unblock:

Bug#860346: marked as done (unblock: oce/0.17.2-2)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:20:00 + with message-id <50030080-5cf0-d986-7c89-123f7f460...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#860346: unblock: oce/0.17.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #860346, regarding unblock: oce/0.17.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#860521: [pkg-horde] Bug#860521: unblock: php-horde-core/2.27.6+debian1-1

2017-04-18 9:09 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Parent : [...] > [...] and prevent all > Horde to be removed from stretch because of jquery-mobile removal (See > #734101). I'm a bit afraid because they are "Marked for autoremoval on 21 April". Will this fit? Regards -- Mathieu Parent

Bug#860425: unblock: emacs24/24.5+1-9

Rob Browning: > Niels Thykier writes: > >> I have two comments/questions: >> >> 1) There is a "Maybe-Failed" FTBFS on ppc64el for emacs24. At first >> glance, I don't see a reason why it should be related to these >> changes. However, it must be resolved for an