Bug#862945: unblock: jbig2dec/0.13-4.1

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 07:22:12AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > The full debdiff is attached t othis mail as debdiff against the current > version in testing. Or not... Salvatore diff -Nru jbig2dec-0.13/debian/changelog jbig2dec-0.13/debian/changelog --- jbig2dec-0.13/debian/changelog

Bug#862945: unblock: jbig2dec/0.13-4.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Please unblock package jbig2dec It fixes three CVEs (which as well were addressed in a DSA): https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3855 +jbig2dec (0.13-4.1) unstable;

Bug#862941: binNMUs needed for multiple arm64 packages (#850814)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hey folks, As first discussed a while back, we've had a bug in gold which caused some broken builds of some arm64 packages. These were mostly in backports, with a few example in the early

Bug#862864: Bug#861612: pixbros: level designs appear to be non-free

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:03:24PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > What we need to check is: Does the game comply with the DFSG and does it > infringe the copyright of another programmer/artist. In my opinion that > is not the case here because the license is DFSG-compatible and the game > looks

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior (2017-05-18): > On 2017-05-07 16:39:00 [+], Niels Thykier wrote: > > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > > > uploaded and built on all releases architectures. > > > > Ack/RT unblock, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack. > > I don't want to rush or anything

Bug#862937: unblock: firejail/0.9.44.8-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package firejail Version 0.9.44.8-2 includes a cherry-picked patch that fixes a memory corruption which leads to a crash when firejail is called with certain options

Bug#862598: marked as done (unblock: udfclient/0.8.8-1)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 20:08:00 + with message-id <8c8150a1-8e11-c339-431b-c8be57f87...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#862598: unblock: udfclient/0.8.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862598, regarding unblock: udfclient/0.8.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#862615: marked as done (unblock: postgresql-9.6/9.6.3-1)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 20:00:00 + with message-id <5828b72f-130f-5623-a8eb-750c95a38...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#862615: unblock: postgresql-9.6/9.6.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862615, regarding unblock: postgresql-9.6/9.6.3-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#861686: unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2

On 2017-05-07 16:39:00 [+], Niels Thykier wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > > uploaded and built on all releases architectures. > > Ack/RT unblock, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack. I don't want to rush or anything but in case it got forgotten, we are still waiting for the d-i ack. > Thanks, >

Bug#862914: nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 07:00:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: block -1 by 831860 > > Adrian Bunk: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > nmu veusz_1.21.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with

Bug#862865: marked as done (unblock: cross-toolchain-base*)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 19:19:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#862865: unblock: cross-toolchain-base* has caused the Debian Bug report #862865, regarding unblock: cross-toolchain-base* to be marked as done. This means

Bug#862898: marked as done (unblock: ntirpc/1.4.4-1)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 18:52:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#862898: unblock: ntirpc/1.4.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862898, regarding unblock: ntirpc/1.4.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#862914: nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 831860 Bug #862914 [release.debian.org] nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1 + python-poppler-qt4_0.24.0-1 862914 was not blocked by any bugs. 862914 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 862914: 831860 and 846956 -- 862914:

Bug#862914: nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1

Control: block -1 by 831860 Adrian Bunk: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu veusz_1.21.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with sip-api-11.3" > nmu python-poppler-qt4_0.24.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild

Bug#862904: marked as done (unblock: dblatex/0.3.9-2)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 18:56:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#862904: unblock: dblatex/0.3.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #862904, regarding unblock: dblatex/0.3.9-2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#862889: marked as done (unblock: python-iptables/0.11.0-4)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 18:54:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#862889: unblock: python-iptables/0.11.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #862889, regarding unblock: python-iptables/0.11.0-4 to be marked as done. This

Bug#862541: Pre-approval request, unblock: caffe/1.0.0-2

Hi jmw, The difference between the 1.0.0~rc4 version and the 1.0.0 version is 162 git commits. I went through these git commits, and these commits are about: 1 documentation update / fix 2 code grooming 3 bug fix 4 add tests 5 support cudnn v6 (does not affect this package) 6 update

Processed: Mention both packages in the bug title

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 862914 nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1 + python-poppler-qt4_0.24.0-1 Bug #862914 [release.debian.org] nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1 Changed Bug title to 'nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1 + python-poppler-qt4_0.24.0-1' from 'nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1'. > thanks Stopping

Bug#862914: nmu: veusz_1.21.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu veusz_1.21.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with sip-api-11.3" nmu python-poppler-qt4_0.24.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with sip-api-11.3" See #831860 for background.

Bug#862871: unblock: intel-microcode/3.20170511.1

On Thu, 18 May 2017, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On 2017-05-17 22:44, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >Please unblock package intel-microcode. > > Unblocked. Thank you! -- Henrique Holschuh

Bug#862871: marked as done (unblock: intel-microcode/3.20170511.1)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 16:25:54 +0100 with message-id <2fad778396f8516979e757615a5bd...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#862871: unblock: intel-microcode/3.20170511.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #862871, regarding unblock: intel-microcode/3.20170511.1 to be marked as done.

Bug#862891: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2

On 2017-05-18 14:25, Markus Wanner wrote: [...] On 05/18/2017 03:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: So far as I can tell, having looked at the BTS and Security Tracker, and the description of the CVE, this issue also affects the flightgear package in unstable and is not yet fixed there. [...] I

Bug#862904: unblock: dblatex/0.3.9-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dblatex While working on the stretch version of the Debian Handbook, I recently discovered a regression in the way dblatex renders some inline elements ( and among

Re: [d-i/stretch] Status on Installation guide and Release notes (from a d-i PoV)

Hello, Dixit Niels Thykier, le 03/04/2017 : >Please let reply to this thread once the changes have been done, so I >can mark them as done in my checklist. :) Doing so, see https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/04/msg00336.html and https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2017/05/msg00012.html

Bug#862891: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2

Adam, thank you for your feedback. On 05/18/2017 03:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > So far as I can tell, having looked at the BTS and Security Tracker, and > the description of the CVE, this issue also affects the flightgear > package in unstable and is not yet fixed there. That's correct,

Bug#862891: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 2017-05-18 8:38, Markus Wanner wrote: as per Salvatore Bonaccorso, the current security fix for flightgear doesn't warrant a DSA on its own (see below). Is it okay to upload to 'stable'? So far as I can tell, having looked at the BTS and Security Tracker, and

Processed: Re: Bug#862891: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #862891 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 862891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862891 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#862864: unblock: pixbros/0.6.3+dfsg-0.1

Am 18.05.2017 um 13:40 schrieb Steve Cotton: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:12:52PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> Usertags: unblock >> >> + * Repackaged to remove generated files and copyright violations >> +from the upstream sources. (Closes: #861612) > > Hi Adrian, Markus and the Release

Bug#862864: unblock: pixbros/0.6.3+dfsg-0.1

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:12:52PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Usertags: unblock > > + * Repackaged to remove generated files and copyright violations > +from the upstream sources. (Closes: #861612) Hi Adrian, Markus and the Release Team, I'm sorry to be a spoilsport, but I ask the Release

Bug#862864: unblock: pixbros/0.6.3+dfsg-0.1

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:40:28PM +0200, Steve Cotton wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:12:52PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Usertags: unblock > > > > + * Repackaged to remove generated files and copyright violations > > +from the upstream sources. (Closes: #861612) > > Hi Adrian, Markus

Bug#862449: marked as done (unblock: drbd-utils/8.9.10-2)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 12:57:16 +0100 with message-id <13a4ec7e31d663d5efcab1cd5148d...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#862449: unblock: drbd-utils/8.9.10-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #862449, regarding unblock: drbd-utils/8.9.10-2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: Bug#862541: Pre-approval request, unblock: caffe/1.0.0-2

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #862541 [release.debian.org] Pre-approval request, unblock: caffe/1.0.0-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 862541: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#862541: Pre-approval request, unblock: caffe/1.0.0-2

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, On 2017-05-14 13:43, lumin wrote: I'm working on bug #862528 for adding a missing file back, and the fix will be shipped in 1.0.0-2 (i.e. not uploaded yet). However the caffe package in testing is 1.0.0~rc4-1 , and I wish stretch to ship the 1.0.0 version [1]

Bug#862561: marked as done (unblock: debian-reference/2.68)

Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2017 12:51:50 +0100 with message-id <539322a8d23805408e8546f55e281...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#862561: unblock: debian-reference/2.68 has caused the Debian Bug report #862561, regarding unblock: debian-reference/2.68 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#861953: unblock: runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-3

Control: tag -1 wontfix moreinfo Hi, On 2017-05-08 00:40, Roger Shimizu wrote: Since you say it should fix unstable first, then stretch or t-p-u, now I think we may just leave runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-2 (current in stretch) as it is in stretch. Because it builds OK (without FTBFS) for stretch. The

Processed: Re: Bug#861953: unblock: runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-3

Processing control commands: > tag -1 wontfix moreinfo Bug #861953 [release.debian.org] unblock: runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-3 Added tag(s) moreinfo and wontfix. -- 861953: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861953 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: severity of 862898 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 862898 normal Bug #862898 [release.debian.org] unblock: ntirpc/1.4.4-1 Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 862898:

Bug#862900: unblock (pre-upload): python-x2go/0.5.0.4-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking (pre-upload) package python-x2go. In X2Go upstream we fixed an issue lately that occurs with gevent 1.1. As I switched to Debian testing only lately with my

Bug#862898: unblock: ntirpc/1.4.4-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: important User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ntirpc Hi, ntirpc/1.4.4-1, which was uploaded some days ago to unstable fixes release critical CVE-2017-8779 bug #861836. Thanks Christoph --

Processed: waiting for unblock

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 862329 by 862384 Bug #862329 {Done: Pirate Praveen } [gitlab] gitlab: fails gitlab install on stretch with alternative gitlab user while configuring dbconfig-common 862329 was not blocked by any bugs. 862329 was not

Bug#862891: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: jessie Severity: normal Dear Release Team, as per Salvatore Bonaccorso, the current security fix for flightgear doesn't warrant a DSA on its own (see below). Is it okay to upload to 'stable'? A debdiff