Your message dated Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:53:00 +
with message-id <1ca2423a-c64f-d476-aaef-f663bf517...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#864399: unblock: serf/1.3.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #864399,
regarding unblock: serf/1.3.9-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:50:00 +
with message-id <3e17d160-cbba-202f-d86a-826fd8064...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#864419: unblock: ettercap (CVE)
has caused the Debian Bug report #864419,
regarding unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:51:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#864409: unblock: squid3/3.5.23-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #864409,
regarding unblock: squid3/3.5.23-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
unblock qla-tools/20140529-2
Hi,
please unblock package qla-tools. #834258 makes the package more or less
useless, because two of four included scripts check for a too old kernel
version.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
could you please remove bandwidthcalc from upcoming stretch? Popcon
reports as little as 20 users and I uploaded the last release in 2008.
As madduck explain in #542844, it's more or less
Processing changes file: bitlbee_3.2.2-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bitlbee_3.2.2-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bitlbee_3.2.2-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bitlbee_3.2.2-2+deb8u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 864419 unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-6
Bug #864419 [release.debian.org] unblock: ettercap (CVE)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-6' from 'unblock: ettercap
(CVE)'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing changes file: otrs2_3.3.9-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes
REJECT
Am 08.06.2017 um 18:44 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On 2017-06-08 11:02, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
>> Version in base suite: 3.3.9-3
>>
>> Base version: otrs2_3.3.9-3
>> Target version: otrs2_3.3.9-3+deb8u1
> [...]
>> +otrs2 (3.3.9-3+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency=high
>> +
>> + * Add patch
On 2017-06-08 11:02, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
Version in base suite: 3.3.9-3
Base version: otrs2_3.3.9-3
Target version: otrs2_3.3.9-3+deb8u1
[...]
+otrs2 (3.3.9-3+deb8u1) jessie-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Add patch 17-CVE-2017-9324:
+This fixes OSA-2017-03, also known as
In addition to the testing I mentioned in my original post, I have now
confirmed that these stretch apps worked with webkit2gtk 2.16.3-2 from
unstable
Tested, Confirmed Still Working
--
anjuta
atril
birdfont
devhelp
evolution-rss
gnome-builder
Jörg, thank you. I am forwarding to the bug for tracking.
Jeremy
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jörg Frings-Fürst
Date: Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Please test webkit2gtk 2.16.3-2 with your packages for stretch now!
To: Jeremy Bicha
Paul, thank you. I'm forwarding to the bug for tracking.
Jeremy
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Gevers
Date: Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Please test webkit2gtk 2.16.3-2 with your packages for stretch now!
To: Jeremy Bicha
Cc:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
a crash got noticed in irssi, and the patch for it is quite minimal:
https://github.com/irssi/irssi/commit/fb08fc7f1aa6b2e616413d003bf021612301ad55
I'd run that into stretch, but
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team
Please unblock package ettercap, we fixed CVE 2017-8366, but the asan enable
patch is not intended for production use.
I commented out that part
Steve McIntyre, on jeu. 08 juin 2017 11:10:50 +0100, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:42:39AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Could we have an unblock for installation-guide=20170607 to be in d-i
> >RC5, to be uploaded soon?
>
> Ummm. Are we *doing* an RC5?
I guess I should
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:42:39AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Could we have an unblock for installation-guide=20170607 to be in d-i
>RC5, to be uploaded soon?
Ummm. Are we *doing* an RC5?
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"C++ ate my
Hi,
On 2017-06-07 20:11, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Would you please confirm that missing copyright for a package's
debian/* is not an RC issue, and that it can wait for stretch-r1?
I've been operating under the assumption that it wasn't RC, and wasn't
worth bothering the release team about.
On 2017-06-08 02:18, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Uploads not including architecture-independent packages are not allowed.
Will there be no arch:all builders for stretch?
And therefore no source-only uploads for stretch-pu? (For packages also
building arch:all packages.)
That would be really bad.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package squid3
When we upgrade from Jessie's squid3 to Stretch we are switching from binary
package named squid3 to the one named squid. We are preserving the config
file
20 matches
Mail list logo