Bug#881900: stretch-pu: package libofx/1:0.9.10-2+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear release team, Upstream has fixed 2 CVE (CVE-2017-2816 and CVE-2017-14731), these 2 CVE are non-dsa. I already backported patches to unstable/testing and now I would like to

Bug#881760: marked as done (nmu: seer_1.1.2-3~bpo8+1)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:40:31 +0100 with message-id <9d23b8d9-133e-ebe7-5a45-d7a008e45...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#881760: nmu: seer_1.1.2-3~bpo8+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #881760, regarding nmu: seer_1.1.2-3~bpo8+1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#881665: marked as done (nmu: varnish-modules_0.12.1-1)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:40:56 +0100 with message-id <1844585b-e2fe-6a79-e204-58ea53932...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#881665: nmu: varnish-modules_0.12.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #881665, regarding nmu: varnish-modules_0.12.1-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#881370: marked as done (nmu: directfb_1.7.7-6)

Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:42:41 +0100 with message-id <418df3a6-8d25-02af-c481-3171c0709...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#881370: nmu: directfb_1.7.7-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #881370, regarding nmu: directfb_1.7.7-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#881871: stretch-pu: package bacula/7.4.4+dfsg-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, we would like to fix the following two problems in stable: 1 ) The bacula packages are vulnerable to a security problem similar to CVE 2017-14610 (PID files not owned by

Bug#881127: transition: xerces-c

The package has been uploaded to unstable and the severities bumped. Thanks.

Bug#881860: transition: glibc 2.25

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.25. It is available in experimental for more than two months, and there is no known regression. It is currently

Bug#881629: transition: http-parser

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote... > No need to revert to the previous version, this looks to be in a good shape > and > there are no clashing transitions. I'll get to the binnmus soon. Thanks a lot for your swift and helping reaction. As far as I can see, the failing builds on hurd and kbsd for

Re: Scheduling 9.3

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 05:00:16PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this >> happily >> makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the >> festive >> season). >>