Hi
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:04:09PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> binNMUs for unstable.
Why, if that is for unstable, permissions for embargoed
queues/security would be needed? Is that due to implementtation on
accessing wanna-build?
Access to information about embargoed information would
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: affects -1 publicsuffix
Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian stretch.
This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it current
is useful for a
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 publicsuffix
Bug #889001 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
publicsuffix/20180125.0922-0+deb9u1
Added indication that 889001 affects publicsuffix
--
889001: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889001
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contac
control: severity 888752 serious
control: severity 888753 serious
control: severity 888754 serious
Hello, the fun has started.
slgdbm started failing with 1.14.1 but not with 1.13, and this is the only
regression I spotted
in the complete rebuild test I did today.
This is a QA package, and the
binNMUs for unstable.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 04:16:21PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > [+t...@security.debian.org for their okay]
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 0
IRC also mentioned:
* https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html says at
the very end: "After 5th January 2017, removed packages will not be
permitted to re-enter testing."
* The #links in the first paragraph are also invalid.
Meaning, the date is wrong and the links don't work.
Happ
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:33:11AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 12:37:46AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.5.html
> >
> > On 26/01/18 20:36, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Package: rele
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 04:16:21PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> [+t...@security.debian.org for their okay]
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > > Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Alexander Larsson has released an update to the Flatpak 0.8.x branch,
fixing a sandbox bypass reported by Gabriel Campana of the Google security
team. It also contains a couple of o
[+t...@security.debian.org for their okay]
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> > Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that the release-team should
> give
> > their okay before the PostgreSQL account can
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:01:18PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that the release-team should give
> their okay before the PostgreSQL account can be created. This should be
> done by way of the release team filing the Debian RT ticket on my behalf,
> pr
[+debian-release]
Hector Oron pointed out in the Debian RT that the release-team should give
their okay before the PostgreSQL account can be created. This should be
done by way of the release team filing the Debian RT ticket on my behalf,
preferable as an inline signed email.
Could someone from t
>Let's do this.
I'm rebuilding against 1.14.1, will upload to unstable in a few hours and raise
bug reports to serious,
in case nothing appears.
G.
13 matches
Mail list logo
