Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Broken with Firefox 60, removal bug for sid is #908532
Cheers,
Moritz
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #907719 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package libtirpc/0.2.5-1.2+deb9u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
907719: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907719
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:55:35PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> # Awaiting fix in unstable
> tags 907719 + moreinfo
This has now happened with the NMU.
Regards,
Salvatore
Matthias Klumpp:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi!
> Yet another LDC ABI and standard library transition is currently going
> on (since D does not provide a stable ABI, this happens with every
> upload of
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_64.0.3282.119-1~deb9u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_64.0.3282.119-1~deb9u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_64.0.3282.119-1~deb9u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 12:46 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 09/10/2018 12:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > I suggest that someone triggers binNMUs for all four packages now
> > > as Julien suggested.
> >
> > Do those need doing in order? (i.e. do we need to binNMU rust, and
> >
Thanks for your mail and your attention.
Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Bug#907199: weboob, Gratuitous sexual references"):
> Just as one example from your previous message, you appear to reject
> working with upstream constructively on this, despite a solution
> involving them being beneficial to the
On 09/10/2018 12:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I suggest that someone triggers binNMUs for all four packages now
>> as Julien suggested.
>
> Do those need doing in order? (i.e. do we need to binNMU rust, and then
> binNMU cargo against the rust binNMUs?)
No, the order doesn't matter. I'd
On 2018-09-10 11:26, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 09/10/2018 12:22 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I agree, I wanted to suggest that, too. Shall I go ahead with the
upload now?
It looks like that happened already? (Judging from
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2018/09/msg00112.html
On 09/10/2018 12:22 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I agree, I wanted to suggest that, too. Shall I go ahead with the
>> upload now?
>
> It looks like that happened already? (Judging from
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2018/09/msg00112.html )
Yes, I assumed it would land in a NEW queue
On 2018-09-10 08:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 09/10/2018 09:41 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Before giving back firefox-esr on those archs if we go with
Adrian's packages, I'd at least want to binNMU rustc/cargo
so we're using binaries built on buildds (and so we know
they're buildable
Processing changes file: cargo_0.25.0-3~deb9u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cargo_0.25.0-3~deb9u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rustc_1.24.1+dfsg1-1~deb9u3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rustc_1.24.1+dfsg1-1~deb9u3_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: stretch
Severity: normal
Hi,
a buffer underrun has been fixed in zutils 1.7-3 (sid), here's an
updated package for stretch:
Dear Ian,
> Chris, what do you think ? I think I have nearly run out of things to
> try that aren't a GR. I'm sure I can get sponsors for a GR, and help
> drafting it.
I sympathise with your viewpoint on the weboob contretemps, but if I may
adopt my attempt at an objective DPL or "Lady
Dear all,
I have been looking forward to this transition as quite a few packages
I like/love depend upon the boost transition happening. Can anybody
share some sort of timeline as to when can we expect the transition to
start ?
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: stretch
Severity: normal
Quack,
This update has been made to:
- fix #905299 to remove insults
- add a warning in the package description about the naming
See attached debdiff.
I plan to do the
On 09/10/2018 09:41 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> My own armhf builds, both native and cross, died either with rustc or
> gcc errors, IIRC (it looked pretty flaky in general).
That's odd because I did not see that issue in the past, both on abel
and on the buildds when 1.24 was built on the
On 09/08/2018 04:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [CC += jcristau and team@security]
>
> On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 13:17 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Can I get permission to bootstrap and upload to stretch or spu for
>> armhf and armel or is there anything that speaks against having
>>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 873384 + moreinfo
Bug #873384 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
calendar-exchange-provider/3.9.0-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
873384:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 873384 - moreinfo
Bug #873384 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
calendar-exchange-provider/3.9.0-4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
873384:
20 matches
Mail list logo
