Bug#921475: stretch-pu: package postfix/3.1.9-0+deb9u1

On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 05:59:37 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed ... > > Please go ahead. > > Regards, > > Adam Uploaded. Thanks, Scott K

Bug#921475: stretch-pu: package postfix/3.1.9-0+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 18:09 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > This update covers two types of changes: > >  - Bug fixes released by upstream in postfix 3.1.9.  As has been the > case in previous micro-releases the fixes are compact, low risk, and > backed by postfix's u

Processed: Re: Bug#921475: stretch-pu: package postfix/3.1.9-0+deb9u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #921475 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package postfix/3.1.9-0+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 921475: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921475 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: packages affected by mpi4py

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 921437 python3-mpi4py src:dolfin Bug #921437 [release.debian.org] nmu: mpi4py_2.0.0-3+b2 Added indication that 921437 affects python3-mpi4py and src:dolfin > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 9

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

Bug#921475: stretch-pu: package postfix/3.1.9-0+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This update covers two types of changes: - Bug fixes released by upstream in postfix 3.1.9. As has been the case in previous micro-releases the fixes are compact, low risk, an

Build failed in Jenkins: debian-archive-keyring-tests_stretch #25

See Changes: [adam] Ensure separated keyrings for Wheezy's keys are removed. -- [...truncated 132.16 KB...] done. Source: debian-archive-keyring Priorit

Freeze exception enquiry (Xen 4.12)

tl;dr: should we update buster to Xen 4.12 (currently, 4.12-RC2) ? Hi. I hope you will be able to answer this question before we prepare a proposed updated package (and certainly without us uploading the package to unstable, since we want to keep unstable for updates to buster). Xen upstream is

Bug#921437: nmu: mpi4py_2.0.0-3+b2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu dolfin has started to FTBFS, see https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/unstable/amd64/dolfin_2018.1.0.post1-13.rbuild.log.gz The dolfin build error comes from mpi4py. The dol

Bug#879644: marked as done (transition: libzip)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:35:30 +0100 with message-id <93741ce7-44c5-4be4-2f91-54776c182...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#879644: transition: libzip has caused the Debian Bug report #879644, regarding transition: libzip to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#879644: transition: libzip

Hi Emilio, Stefan, On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:27:40AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 23/10/17 22:00, Stefan Schoerghofer wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition >

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3_mips64el.changes ACCEPT

Re: Rails 5 transition plan - help needed

On ചൊ, ഫെബ്രു 5, 2019 at 4:10 വൈകു, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 05/02/2019 03:52, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi Release team, I have filed removal requests for blocking packages. Can you process those and help get rails to testing? Done: rails | 2:5.2.2+dfsg-1| testing

Bug#921051: marked as done (RM: ruby-facebox-rails/0.2.0-2)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:44:57 +0100 with message-id <13e0a70e-3fd1-c2aa-fbc1-79038a741...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#921051: RM: ruby-facebox-rails/0.2.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #921051, regarding RM: ruby-facebox-rails/0.2.0-2 to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#916435: stretch-pu: package cups/2.2.1-8+deb9u3

On 2019-02-05 10:05, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Control: tags -1 +pending Le lundi, 4 février 2019, 23.06:44 h CET Adam D. Barratt a écrit : Please go ahead. Uploaded, thanks for the confirmation. For future reference, for p-u bugs we use "pending" for "has been accepted into p-u", rather

Bug#921168: marked as done (nmu: cgal_4.13-1)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:40:58 +0100 with message-id <2540b1f1-74ec-f30e-a1e5-914ece6f1...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#921168: nmu: cgal_4.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #921168, regarding nmu: cgal_4.13-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#921167: marked as done (nmu: gnunet-gtk_0.10.1-5)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:43:42 +0100 with message-id <7d3a3ba2-22fd-3170-0ca9-65b206a2c...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#921167: nmu: gnunet-gtk_0.10.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #921167, regarding nmu: gnunet-gtk_0.10.1-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#921049: marked as done (RM: redmine/3.4.6-1)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:39:58 +0100 with message-id <139c8352-2e77-d282-1405-2d3e36b38...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#921049: RM: redmine/3.4.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #921049, regarding RM: redmine/3.4.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#921050: marked as done (RM: ruby-protected-attributes/1.1.4-2)

Your message dated Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:38:48 +0100 with message-id <071a0312-6464-2aed-c37e-c194c09fa...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#921050: RM: ruby-protected-attributes/1.1.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #921050, regarding RM: ruby-protected-attributes/1.1.4-2 to be marked as done.

Re: Rails 5 transition plan - help needed

On 05/02/2019 03:52, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi Release team, > > I have filed removal requests for blocking packages. Can you process those > and help get rails to testing? Done: rails | 2:5.2.2+dfsg-1| testing| source, all rails | 2:5.2.2+dfsg-1| unstable

Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

Please could we have a decision on this in plenty of time before the freeze? Given the upstream GC improvements aimed at mitigating or solving "the memory leak problem" in gjs 1.54.x, I am not comfortable with releasing buster with gjs 1.52.x (which has a backport of those changes done by a develop

Bug#916435: stretch-pu: package cups/2.2.1-8+deb9u3

Control: tags -1 +pending Le lundi, 4 février 2019, 23.06:44 h CET Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Please go ahead. Uploaded, thanks for the confirmation. Cheers, OdyX

Processed: Re: Bug#916435: stretch-pu: package cups/2.2.1-8+deb9u3

Processing control commands: > tags -1 +pending Bug #916435 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package cups/2.2.1-8+deb9u3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 916435: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916435 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: linux_4.9.144-3_mips.changes ACCEPT

Bug#919576: stretch-pu: package ncmpc/0.25-0.1

Shame /o\ On 04/02/2019 22:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 14:35 +0100, kaliko wrote: >> On 27/01/2019 09:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:44:14PM +0100, kaliko wrote: > [...] Update fixing CVE-2018-9240 / #894

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: samba_4.5.16+dfsg-1_mips64el.changes ACCEPT