On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 01:20:30AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/06/2019 à 21:12, Sam Hartman a écrit :
>
> > My position is that the openjdk maintainers should make this decision
> > based on what is best for our users based on the quality of the
> > software.
>
> There is little doubt
Le 10/06/2019 à 21:12, Sam Hartman a écrit :
> My position is that the openjdk maintainers should make this decision
> based on what is best for our users based on the quality of the
> software.
There is little doubt the OpenJDK users want the latest stable release
for their stable systems, and
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sergey,
On 10-06-2019 12:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package monit. The new upstream
> bugfix release fix two CVEs:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #930313 [release.debian.org] unblock: monit/1:5.25.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
930313: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930313
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Bourg writes:
Emmanuel> Le 10/06/2019 à 18:22, Sam Hartman a écrit :
>> we release with pre-releases for other packages all the time when
>> maintainers believe that's the right call to make. This is an
>> area where we trust maintainers to decide
Le 10/06/2019 à 18:22, Sam Hartman a écrit :
> we release with pre-releases for other packages all the time when
> maintainers believe that's the right call to make.
> This is an area where we trust maintainers to decide what the right
> choice is for Debian. Sometimes they disagree with
Hi Shengjing,
On 10-06-2019 19:52, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:03 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>> google-cloud-print-connector FTBFS on armel
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=google-cloud-print-connector=armel=1.12-1%2Bb22=1559987469=0
>>
>> prometheus FTBFS on
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package therion.
This fixes a "Severity: important" bug in a "Priority: optional"
package, which is a regression from the version in stretch:
https://bugs.debian.org/930289
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 2:03 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
[...]
> However, it seems that my previous report was missing some pieces (I
> only check amd64 last time).
>
> coyim FTBFS previously already on arm64
>
> "Emmanuel" == Emmanuel Bourg writes:
Emmanuel> Le 10/06/2019 à 16:18, tony mancill a écrit :
>> Emmanuel, I recognize that I am reversing position turn on this.
>> I know that you had expressed reservations about shipping with an
>> EA version as well. I took a look at the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Tags: d-i
Hi there,
During a chat last at MiniDebConf Hamburg last week-end we (cryptsetup
package maintainers + KiBi + ivodd) discussed a path forward for #927165
(debian-installer:
Le 10/06/2019 à 16:18, tony mancill a écrit :
> Emmanuel, I recognize that I am reversing position turn on this. I know
> that you had expressed reservations about shipping with an EA version as
> well. I took a look at the diffs between 11.0.3+7 and 11.0.4+4, and
> all though there are a lot
My original mail didn't make it to the debian-release mailing list due
to the size of the debdiff, so here it is, without the attachment.
-- Kunal
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:40:46 -0400 Kunal Mehta wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nageru
It contains a fix for an RC bug that is only seen with recent
versions of Mesa (but buster's Mesa is new enough). The fix
is a trivial backport from upstream
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 04:19:53PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 09:54:50PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 05-06-2019 22:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > I really want bug 900912 and 925071 fixed. It seems that is missing from
> > > your second approach. Let me
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:52:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#930297: unblock: fastforward/1:0.51-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #930297,
regarding unblock: fastforward/1:0.51-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:53:00 +
with message-id <700763b8-eaf2-dcb4-14a9-ecd0bb6b9...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#930298: unblock: dot-forward/1:0.71-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #930298,
regarding unblock: dot-forward/1:0.71-5
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:54:00 +
with message-id <751062a9-5149-b757-ce34-a66f5e605...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#930286: unblock: rclone/1.45-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #930286,
regarding unblock: rclone/1.45-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dot-forward
diff -Nru dot-forward-0.71/debian/changelog dot-forward-0.71/debian/changelog
--- dot-forward-0.71/debian/changelog 2019-01-11 21:46:13.0 +0100
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fastforward
diff -Nru fastforward-0.51/debian/changelog fastforward-0.51/debian/changelog
--- fastforward-0.51/debian/changelog 2019-01-13 00:29:15.0 +0100
20 matches
Mail list logo
