Uploading linux (5.8.14-1)

2020-10-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi I would like to upload a new linux version 5.8.14-1 to unstable today (or tomorrow) to catch up with the v5.8.y stable series. An ABI bump is included. The pending changes in the packaging are furthermore: * [armhf] Enable MFD_AXP20X_RSB as a built-in (Closes: #914813). * [x86] Enable

Re: Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync

2020-10-10 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello Am 10.10.20 um 11:41 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 11:16 +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: >> Hello Adam, > > Hi, > > I've replied to the bug, as that's where you raised the questions, but > as this is trending towards general discussion we should possibly move > it to

Processed: libdata-alias-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.32: t/03_copy.t failure

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 968912 with -1 Bug #968912 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.32 968912 was blocked by: 961208 968913 961155 960863 961157 961152 961154 964902 968912 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 968912: 971969 -- 968912:

Bug#968852: marked as done (transition: cfitsio)

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:03:39 +0200 with message-id <20201010160339.gc4003...@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#968852: transition: cfitsio has caused the Debian Bug report #968852, regarding transition: cfitsio to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#968580: marked as done (transition: ilmbase/openexr)

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:02:59 +0200 with message-id <20201010160259.gb4003...@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#968580: transition: ilmbase/openexr has caused the Debian Bug report #968580, regarding transition: ilmbase/openexr to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Stéphane On 2020-09-30 09:12:20 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org > > Dear Release Team, > > I've updated ocaml to 4.11.1 and

Processed: Re: Bug#971958: transition: libpgm

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #971958 [release.debian.org] transition: libpgm Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpgm.html Bug #971958 [release.debian.org] transition: libpgm Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#971958: transition: libpgm

2020-10-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 + confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpgm.html Control: block -1 by 971957 On 2020-10-10 17:37:57 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >

Processed: Re: Bug#971942: transition: ufo-core

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ufo-core.html Bug #971942 [release.debian.org] transition: ufo-core Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ufo-core.html'. > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #971942

Bug#971942: transition: ufo-core

2020-10-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ufo-core.html Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 2020-10-10 11:40:13 +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition >

Bug#971958: transition: libpgm

2020-10-10 Thread GCS
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, I'm asking for a small transition of libpgm. Two packages are affected, libxs and zeromq3. The latter builds fine with libpgm 5.3 in experimental. The question is libxs because

Bug#971954: buster-pu: package libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:2.23-1+2020b

2020-10-10 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I've uploaded libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:2.23-1+2020b to buster. It contains the changes

Bug#971866: buster-pu: package okular/4:17.12.2-2.2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 09:40:05AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 21:15 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Low severity fix for Okular, which doesn't warrant a DSA. > > I've tested with the reproducerand a number of other PDF > > files

Bug#971915: buster-pu: package transmission/2.94-2+deb10u2

2020-10-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 09:44:31AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 19:40 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Fixes a memory leak when running Transmission in daemon mode. > > > > [ Tests ] > > Have been using the package since a few weeks

Bug#971869: buster-pu: package freecol/0.11.6+dfsg2-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 09:41:38AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 21:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Low severity bugfix for freecol, which doesn't warrant a DSA. > > > > The (identical) patch has been in unstable for half a year,

Bug#971944: buster-pu: package espeak/1.48.04+dfsg-7+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, [ Reason ] Espeak cannot drive the mbrola-fr4 speech synthesis voice if the mbrola-fr1 package is not installed. This is because some of the mb-fr4 espeak rules refer to the

Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 11:16 +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > Hello Adam, Hi, I've replied to the bug, as that's where you raised the questions, but as this is trending towards general discussion we should possibly move it to the debian-release list instead. > Am 07.10.20 um 21:45 schrieb Adam

Bug#971942: transition: ufo-core

2020-10-10 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: pi...@debian.org (please explain about the transition: impacted packages, reason, ... for more info see: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions) Hello, I

Bug#971807: buster-pu: package webext-tbsync

2020-10-10 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello Adam, Am 07.10.20 um 21:45 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 21:24 +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: >> Hello Adam, >> >> On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 19:54:41 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" >> wrote:> severity 971807 normal ... >> Since RT updated Thunderbird in buster from version 68.x

Bug#970816: buster-pu: package libimobiledevice/1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 09:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > I backported some of the changes to stable (the snapshot and backup > > protocols versions, unfortunately the debug part would require > > backporting others commits). > > Please go

Processed: Re: Bug#971915: buster-pu: package transmission/2.94-2+deb10u2

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #971915 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package transmission/2.94-2+deb10u2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 971915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971915 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#971915: buster-pu: package transmission/2.94-2+deb10u2

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 19:40 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Fixes a memory leak when running Transmission in daemon mode. > > [ Tests ] > Have been using the package since a few weeks and the user > who reported the leak (running an affected setup) confirmed >

Bug#971869: buster-pu: package freecol/0.11.6+dfsg2-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 21:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Low severity bugfix for freecol, which doesn't warrant a DSA. > > The (identical) patch has been in unstable for half a year, also > doublechecked by playing for half an hour :-) Please go ahead.

Processed: Re: Bug#971866: buster-pu: package okular/4:17.12.2-2.2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #971866 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package okular/4:17.12.2-2.2+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 971866: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#971869: buster-pu: package freecol/0.11.6+dfsg2-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #971869 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package freecol/0.11.6+dfsg2-2+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 971869: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#971866: buster-pu: package okular/4:17.12.2-2.2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2020-10-08 at 21:15 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Low severity fix for Okular, which doesn't warrant a DSA. > I've tested with the reproducerand a number of other PDF > files that everything works as expected. > Please go ahead. Regards, Adam

Bug#971685: buster-pu: package fish/3.0.2-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2020-10-04 at 19:53 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I am working on solving https://bugs.debian.org/970777 , a bug that > made package fish in Debian 10 unusable with sudo in terminal. The > patch comes from upstream trunk. The metadata for that bug indicates that

Processed: Re: Bug#971685: buster-pu: package fish/3.0.2-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #971685 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package fish/3.0.2-2+deb10u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 971685: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971685 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#971062: buster-pu: package plinth/19.1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2020-09-26 at 22:38 -0400, James Valleroy wrote: > This update proposes to fix security tracker issue CVE-2020-25073, > where a remote attackers could obtain sensitive information from the > /server-status page of the Apache HTTP Server, because a connection >

Processed: Re: Bug#971062: buster-pu: package plinth/19.1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #971062 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package plinth/19.1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 971062: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971062 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#970745: buster-pu: package pdns_4.1.6-3+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #970745 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package pdns_4.1.6-3+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 970745: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970745 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#970745: buster-pu: package pdns_4.1.6-3+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 22:22 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Fixes for low-severity issues CVE-2019-10203 and CVE-2020-17482. > Both using upstream patches for the 4.1 branch. Please go ahead. > Maybe it should be pointed out in the stable update notes that >

Bug#970655: buster-pu: package sleuthkit/4.6.5-1+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 20:01 +, Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro wrote: > I would like to update the sleuthkit on the buster to prevent a stack > buffer overflow in yaffsfs_istat, because during a review of the > Debian Security Tracker, I found CVE-2020-10232.

Processed: Re: Bug#970655: buster-pu: package sleuthkit/4.6.5-1+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #970655 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package sleuthkit/4.6.5-1+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 970655: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970655 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#970816: buster-pu: package libimobiledevice/1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #970816 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package libimobiledevice/1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-2+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 970816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970816 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#970816: buster-pu: package libimobiledevice/1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-2+deb10u1

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2020-09-23 at 20:59 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > would it be possible to allow a new libimobiledevice version in > Buster? > > [ Reason ] > > the recently released iOS (and ipadOS) 14 updates some protocols > version used for communication between a

Bug#966373: general: Higher version for uploads to stable and oldstable distributions

2020-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 20:05 +0200, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > El dl 21 de 09 de 2020 a les 16:50 +0200, Javier Serrano Polo va > escriure: > > I will elaborate on the problem with 1-1+b1foo1 and 1-1+b1foo1+b1 > > if you are willing to help. > > First, a binNMU in Debian may be unnecessary in