On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 01:51:27 + Paul Wise wrote:
> We are using libapache2-mod-auth-kerb at my workplace, I've raised an
> issue about taking over modauthkerb upstream or just switching to
> another module
We have decided to switch to the gssapi module.
I would recommend that
Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2020, 18:37 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
[...]
> Assuming that's the only required change, please go ahead.
Thanks. Reverting the debhelper bump to 12 was the only packaging change. I
have uploaded ublock-origin 1.30.0 a few minutes ago.
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: krb5_1.17-3+deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertags 974667 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
> tags 974667 - bullseye
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #972149 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
net-snmp/5.7.3+dfsg-5+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
972149: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 21:30 +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> The security release in deb10u1 made EXTEND-MIB read-only
> to close a security hole (CVE-2020-15862/Bug #9651166)
> However this meant the cacheTime and execType could not be
> changed which caused problems with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 974698 + pending
Bug #974698 [release.debian.org] RM: freshplayerplugin -- RoQA; Obsolete,
Unsupported by browsers, EOL upstream
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
974698:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 13:02 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to update the Firefox/Chromium addon ublock-origin in
> Buster. We have had several bug reports in the past about sandboxing
> problems in regard to ublock-origin like #946808, #954097, #923001,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #973695 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
ublock-origin/1.22.2+dfsg-1~deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
973695: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973695
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #955277 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package mini-buildd/1.0.36
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #955277 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package mini-buildd/1.0.36
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
955277:
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Hi,
Apologies for having somehow missed your earlier reply.
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 08:51 +0200, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> thanks for yor answer.
>
> On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> (...)
>
> > We'd need to see diffs
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #963340 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package iptables-persistent/1.0.14
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #963340 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package iptables-persistent/1.0.14
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
963340:
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 22:28 +0100, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> can you comment if the attached patch [1] is acceptable for inclusion
> in the next stable update?
>
> It addresses #961589, #963012 and the flushing rules logic [2]?
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #971392 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
tigervnc/1.9.0+dfsg-3+deb10u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
971392: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 21:32 +0200, Joachim Falk wrote:
> Security fix for CVE-2020-26117 as detailed in bug #971272.
>
Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
Regards,
Adam
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #973342 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package libdbi-perl/1.642-1+deb10u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
973342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 07:43 +0100, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> libdbi-perl is still vulnerable to CVE-2014-10401: DBD::File drivers
> can open files from folders other than those specifically passed via
> the f_dir attribute.
+ * lib/DBD/File.pm: fix CVE-2014-10401
Your message dated Sun, 22 Nov 2020 18:46:28 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#975448: nmu: antimony_0.9.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #975448,
regarding nmu: antimony_0.9.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
hi stable release managers, hi Felipe,
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:33:21AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org,fsate...@debian.org
>
> Hi
> If you want to keep src:mariadb-10.3 around, one or the other. Or you
> could upload a new version of mariadb-10.3 which drops the package.
Ok, I will upload a new 10.3. I want it to stay around for a bit more
until the transition of 10.5 is fully completed and verified to
replace 10.3 in full.
Hi Otto,
On 22-11-2020 14:41, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> This is a temporary transitional package that does not exist in 10.5
> anymore: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/libmariadbclient-dev
This is a binary from mariadb-10.3. We discussed before, it shouldn't be
part of bullseye, right? What
> https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt.gz says this;
>
> trying: mariadb-10.5
> skipped: mariadb-10.5 (1, 0, 30)
> got: 31+0: a-1:a-27:a-1:a-0:i-0:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-2
> * s390x: libmariadbclient-dev
>
> So, migrating mariadb-10.5 to testing would make libmariadbclient-dev
>
Hi Otto,
On 22-11-2020 14:11, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>> Could you please add some whitelist/override for debci so that at
>> least the issue of "autopkgtest for mariadb-10.3/1:10.3.24-2" failing
>> would go away [...]
>
> I see you did this in https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/elbrus,
Hello!
> Could you please add some whitelist/override for debci so that at
> least the issue of "autopkgtest for mariadb-10.3/1:10.3.24-2" failing
> would go away [...]
I see you did this in https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/elbrus, thanks!
We also found a hack to get around the amrhf
I'll send the patch to #975082 as soon as I successfully pbuild
with it, thanks Sebastian.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
The antimony binnmus for the python 3.9 transition failed due to bug
975109 . The maintainer made an upload fixing the bug but unfortunately it was
not source-only and the included amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 973407 by 975439
Bug #973407 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-bioc-3.12
973407 was blocked by: 974976 973788
973407 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 973407: 975439
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On 2020-11-22 06:12:36 -0500, Nick Black wrote:
> first off, sorry about that. it was in the NEWS, but it really
> did come at an inconvenient time, and probably wasn't the best
> call. this is an API change but *not* an ABI change[0].
>
> * 2.0.7 (2020-11-21)
> * The `horiz` union of
> i've sent off a patch to the snd author; how would you feel
> about me providing you with that same patch? it's quite trivial,
> and fewer than a dozen lines.
Alternatively, I can patch the change out of
notcurses-2.0.7+dfsg.1 and cut a new debian release that will
support an unchanged snd. I
first off, sorry about that. it was in the NEWS, but it really
did come at an inconvenient time, and probably wasn't the best
call. this is an API change but *not* an ABI change[0].
* 2.0.7 (2020-11-21)
* The `horiz` union of `ncplane_options` has been discarded; the `int x`
within has been
Hi Nick
On 2020-11-21 09:10:37 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On 2020-11-18 20:33:46 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-notcurses.html
> >
> > On 2020-11-18 01:46:40 -0500, Nick
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #975029 {Done: Nick Black } [release.debian.org]
transition: notcurses
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed
Control: reopen -1
Hi Nick
This bug is used to track the progress of the transition. Only after the
old binaries have been removed from testing, we consider them done. So
please do not close the transition bug with the upload to untable.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
33 matches
Mail list logo
