Bug#990113: release.debian.org: Permission to upload armadillo: sparse matrix bug fix

2021-06-20 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Release Team, Please permit me to upload the attached targeted fix from upstream that fixed erroneous calculations relating to sparse diagonal matrices. This fix is needed to prevent some numerical errors, and I request you to consider this

Bug#990111: unblock: python-virtualenv/20.4.0+ds-2

2021-06-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package python-virtualenv python-virtualenv (20.4.0+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Patch: Fix --upgrade-embed-wheels. * Replace the pkg_resources addition part

Re: Bug#989839: Thunderbird 1:78.11.0-1 in testing lacks full functionality

2021-06-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2021-06-20 21:43:45 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:33:37PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Hallo Carsten > > > > On 2021-06-19 09:00:13 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > > > Hello Kevin, hello Sebastian, > > > > > > thanks for working on this issue in

Re: Bug#989839: Thunderbird 1:78.11.0-1 in testing lacks full functionality

2021-06-20 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 09:33:37PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hallo Carsten > > On 2021-06-19 09:00:13 +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > > Hello Kevin, hello Sebastian, > > > > thanks for working on this issue in between times, I wasn't able to do > > anything practically the last days.

Re: Fw: whizzytex 1.3.7-1 MIGRATED to testing

2021-06-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2021-06-19 16:02:21 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Just a question of whizzytex testing migration, since it was blocked > due to freeze and I think no one has requested unblock. Is there any > reason to be allowed to go testing? It has successful autopkgtests and is not a key

Fw: whizzytex 1.3.7-1 MIGRATED to testing

2021-06-20 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Just a question of whizzytex testing migration, since it was blocked due to freeze and I think no one has requested unblock. Is there any reason to be allowed to go testing? Note: no harm to go into testing, IMHO. Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 04:39:11 + From:

Bug#990102: marked as done (nmu: qosmic_1.6.0-4)

2021-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2021 19:30:21 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#990102: nmu: qosmic_1.6.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #990102, regarding nmu: qosmic_1.6.0-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#990102: nmu: qosmic_1.6.0-4

2021-06-20 Thread Peter
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com nmu qosmic_1.6.0-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild using flam3_3.1.1-4" flam3 has been updated, mainly to fix a rendering problem,

Processed: Re: Bug#990077: unblock: apache2/2.4.48-3

2021-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #990077 [release.debian.org] unblock: apache2/2.4.48-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > retitle -1 unblock: apache2/2.4.48-3 Bug #990077 [release.debian.org] unblock: apache2/2.4.48-2 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: apache2/2.4.48-3' from 'unblock:

Bug#990077: unblock: apache2/2.4.48-3

2021-06-20 Thread Yadd
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: retitle -1 unblock: apache2/2.4.48-3 Le 20/06/2021 à 16:35, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2021-06-19 18:13:16 +0200, Yadd wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User:

Bug#990065: unblock: squid-deb-proxy/0.8.15+nmu1

2021-06-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Sebastian Ramacher (2021-06-20): > I'm not an apparmor expert, but is this enough? Shouldn't there also be > a profile for the binary that uses this abstraction? > > In any case, the package builds an udeb. Cyril, could you please (N)ACK > for D-I? Such apparmor things are no factor for d-i, no

Re: Bug#989839: Thunderbird 1:78.11.0-1 in testing lacks full functionality

2021-06-20 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello Sebastian, Am 19.06.21 um 21:33 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: ... >> To prevent quite a lot of work on all involved parties with not that >> much gain in the end I'd suggest to go back to my option B that was to >> (re)build Thunderbird with it's internal shipped NSS version. > > If that's

Bug#990077: unblock: apache2/2.4.48-2

2021-06-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2021-06-19 18:13:16 +0200, Yadd wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org > > Please unblock package apache2 > > [ Reason ] > In the past we had some

Processed: Re: Bug#990077: unblock: apache2/2.4.48-2

2021-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #990077 [release.debian.org] unblock: apache2/2.4.48-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 990077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#990065: unblock: squid-deb-proxy/0.8.15+nmu1

2021-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo d-i Bug #990065 [release.debian.org] unblock: squid-deb-proxy/0.8.15+nmu1 Added tag(s) d-i and moreinfo. -- 990065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990065 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#990065: unblock: squid-deb-proxy/0.8.15+nmu1

2021-06-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i On 2021-06-19 15:33:48 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package squid-deb-proxy > > [ Reason ] > squid-deb-proxy needs its apparmor

Bug#990078: marked as done (unblock: guile-2.2/2.2.7+1-6)

2021-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2021 13:22:14 + with message-id and subject line unblock guile-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #990078, regarding unblock: guile-2.2/2.2.7+1-6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it