Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #991425
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
The new version is now available in unstable.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEE2JDTPWFH4vUeM4aHCjk1SrblfeEFAmD7f4ISHGtvc3RlckBk
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 991425 - moreinfo
Bug #991425 [release.debian.org] unblock: mupdf/1.17.0+ds1-2 [pre-approval]
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
991425:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package distro-info-data
distro-info-data (0.51) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update bullseye's release date, bookworm's creation date, and buster's EoL
date based
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:38:43 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock kdump-tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #991415,
regarding unblock: kdump-tools/1:1.6.8.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:28:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock exim4
has caused the Debian Bug report #991397,
regarding unblock: exim4/4.94.2-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:29:14 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#990679: unblock: [pre-approval]
privacybadger/2021.6.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #990679,
regarding unblock: [pre-approval] privacybadger/2021.6.8-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2021-07-23 17:52:44 +0900, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package mupdf
>
> [ Reason ]
> To fix two CVEs
> -
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #991425 [release.debian.org] unblock: mupdf/1.17.0+ds1-2 [pre-approval]
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
991425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:07:58 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock lemonldap-ng
has caused the Debian Bug report #991421,
regarding unblock: lemonldap-ng/2.0.11+ds-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:05:11 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock krb5
has caused the Debian Bug report #991374,
regarding unblock: krb5/1.18.3-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:06:08 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock pppoeconf
has caused the Debian Bug report #991407,
regarding unblock: pppoeconf/1.21+nmu2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2021-07-23 16:02:46 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: by...@debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Please unblock package flameshot
>
> I am looking forward
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock freeradius
has caused the Debian Bug report #991432,
regarding unblock: freeradius/3.0.21+dfsg-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #991447 [release.debian.org] unblock: flameshot/0.9.0+ds1-2 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
991447: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991447
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:40:15 +0200
with message-id <26ad9deb-7d88-8801-86be-26c63c1b8...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991372: unblock: glibc/2.31-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #991372,
regarding unblock: glibc/2.31-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 22:39:11 +0200
with message-id <56252ea1-b921-c0fd-2318-e15474b72...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#990932: unblock: udpkg/1.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #990932,
regarding unblock: udpkg/1.20
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: by...@debian.org
Severity: normal
Please unblock package flameshot
I am looking forward to fixing several bugs that affect current
flameshot/0.9.0+ds1-1 in Debian Testing. These bugs include
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:04:32 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991359: unblock: liquidsoap/1.4.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #991359,
regarding unblock: liquidsoap/1.4.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package six
This is the last bit in the series of adding more Breaks to help the
removal of the unversioned python packages along with the packaged
python2 modules on
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freeradius
[ Reason ]
Misleading comment in systemd service file about how to get capabilities
for privileged ports: #985967.
[ Impact ]
Users could have a hard
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 08:00:25AM +0200, Yadd wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
>
> Please unblock package lemonldap-ng
>
> [ Reason ]
> lemonldap-ng 2.0.11+ds-3 has
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #991359 [release.debian.org] unblock: liquidsoap/1.4.3-3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
991359: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991359
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Thanks, the new version has been uploaded to unstable and built.
Cheers
Kyle
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze
Your message dated Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:53:45 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991366: nmu: varnish-modules_0.16.0-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991366,
regarding nmu: varnish-modules_0.16.0-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package mupdf
[ Reason ]
To fix two CVEs
- - https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-37220
- -
Adrian Bunk writes:
> I am not a member of the release team, but shouldn't #991348 be a
> release critical bug in any case?
>
> An security update of varnish after bullseye became stable could cause
> to same problem, breaking production systems of our users.
[...]
> Doing first an NMU and
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 05:48:52PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hello,
>
> Please do a BinNMU of "varnish-modules" to ensure that the "varnish" security
> fix can
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: secur...@debian.org
Please unblock package lemonldap-ng
[ Reason ]
lemonldap-ng 2.0.11+ds-3 has several vulnerabilities fixed in 2.0.12.
This update fixes:
* Session cache
28 matches
Mail list logo
