Hi,
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:02:11AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This bug was "fixed" by adding breaks. Also there is still a CTTE bug
> open.
I am aware of both. You might have noticed that I did contribute to the
CTTE bug.
If you disagree with the way the bug was addressed (which seems
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 10:38:39PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I was looking into why debianutils doesn't migrate and saw the block
> hint from Sebastian Ramacher:
> | # 20210818
> | # #992399: removes interface from an essential package without finishing
> that transition in a stable release
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org
[ Reason ]
Various "non DSA" CVEs have accumulated in Vim, and it seemed like a
good idea to get a new upload addressing those.
[ Impact ]
*
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:10 PM Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> The automatically generated tracker at
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-console-bridge.html
> detects more reverse dependencies. Do those also build fine with the new
> version of console-bridge?
>
Thanks Sebastian
* Chris Hofstaedtler [211005 00:18]:
> Will followup with the ftp.d.o bug#.
#995744.
Chris
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Team,
please RM hardlink from testing, to allow util-linux to migrate.
src:util-linux now ships the hardlink program, and on upgrades hardlink
should get deconfigured/removed. See
Hi,
I was looking into why debianutils doesn't migrate and saw the block
hint from Sebastian Ramacher:
| # 20210818
| # #992399: removes interface from an essential package without finishing that
transition in a stable release first
| block debianutils
The bug mentioned above is marked as done
On 10/3/2021 5:14 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:48:48AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
I want to make sure that you're aware of what I consider HIGHLY inappropriate
behavior by Chuck where he is trying to sidestep/override the Xen maintainers
by filing this bug directly to
On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 at 16:35:10 +0200, tkoeck wrote:
> 16:32:01 tron-nb gnome-shell[30171]: pushModal: invocation of begin_modal
> failed
> Oct 4 16:32:05 tron-nb gnome-shell[30171]: pushModal: invocation of
> begin_modal failed
> Oct 4 16:32:07 tron-nb gnome-shell[30171]: pushModal:
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> summary 995341 87
Summary replaced with message bug 995341 message 87
> summary 994899 96
Summary replaced with message bug 994899 message 96
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
994899:
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Your message dated Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:41:45 -0400
with message-id <5e09b6f3-4807-9e2f-2611-a7e904ec7...@netscape.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#995341: bullseye-pu: package
xen-hypervisor-4.14-amd64/4.14.3-1~deb11u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #995341,
regarding bullseye-pu: package
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I have uploaded keystone/18.0.0-3+deb11u2 to Bullseye. You can flag it
for acceptance.
For Buster, I'm having the problem that I cannot build the package
without subunit 1.4.0-3 which is in Bullseye only (Buster has 1.3.0-1).
Would it be acceptable that I upload both
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:39 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> > The consistent OOM is surprising given that you state that the worker
> > has 250GB of RAM. Looking at the logs,
> > I note that the tests are being passed the option -p 160 by the
> > dh-golang helper, so it will
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_i386-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Your message dated Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:24:50 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#995072: nmu: tripwire_2.4.3.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #995072,
regarding nmu: tripwire_2.4.3.7-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:25:17 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#995620: nmu: tripwire_2.4.3.7-3+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #995620,
regarding nmu: tripwire_2.4.3.7-3+b3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20190702+deb10u11_source.changes
ACCEPT
25 matches
Mail list logo
