Bug#998338: transition: urdfdom

2021-11-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:54:49AM +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:46 PM Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: >... > > CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/urdf/urdfConfig.cmake:171 > > (message): > > Project 'rviz' tried to find library > > '$<$>:-lurdfdom_sensor'.

Bug#998338: transition: urdfdom

2021-11-09 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:46 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-11-08 23:03:51, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > > > On 2021-11-08 22:41:02 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > > Hi Sebastian: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Sebastian Ramacher < >

Bug#998338: transition: urdfdom

2021-11-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2021-11-08 23:03:51, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > On 2021-11-08 22:41:02 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > Hi Sebastian: > > > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Sebastian Ramacher > > wrote: > > > > > Why is liburdfom-tools being renamed? This packages does

Bug#998344: buster-pu: package llvm-toolchain-11/1:11.0.1-2~deb10u1

2021-11-09 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
Hi Adam, On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 02:20:35PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 13:28 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > In order to support the update of rustc in buster, which in turn is > > needed to support the updates of firefox-esr and thunderbird, I am > > proposing an

Bug#998169: transition: unixodbc

2021-11-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2021-11-03 21:23:20, Hugh McMaster wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 10:24, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Why do the binary packages have Breaks + Replaces on binary packages > > with the old SONAME? > > Some files are split from existing packages: > * unixodbc-common

Bug#998192: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26

2021-11-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 8 November 2021 at 22:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: | Control: tags -1 moreinfo | Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html | | On 2021-10-31 14:29:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Package: release.debian.org | > Severity: normal | > User:

Processed: transition: gdal

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html Bug #998887 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html'. > block -1 by 998833 998827 984398 984401 984283

Bug#998887: transition: gdal

2021-11-09 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html Control: block -1 by 998833 998827 984398 984401

Bug#998874: marked as done (nmu: xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-5+b5)

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:13:02 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998874: nmu: xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-5+b5 has caused the Debian Bug report #998874, regarding nmu: xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-5+b5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#998873: marked as done (nmu: pxp_1.2.9-2+b4)

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:07:51 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998873: nmu: pxp_1.2.9-2+b4 has caused the Debian Bug report #998873, regarding nmu: pxp_1.2.9-2+b4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#998872: marked as done (nmu: ocamlrss_2.2.2-1+b1)

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:07:35 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998872: nmu: ocamlrss_2.2.2-1+b1 has caused the Debian Bug report #998872, regarding nmu: ocamlrss_2.2.2-1+b1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#998871: marked as done (nmu: ocamldap_2.4.2-1)

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:07:22 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998871: nmu: ocamldap_2.4.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #998871, regarding nmu: ocamldap_2.4.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#998870: marked as done (nmu: ocaml-lastfm_0.3.2-1+b5)

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:07:10 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998870: nmu: ocaml-lastfm_0.3.2-1+b5 has caused the Debian Bug report #998870, regarding nmu: ocaml-lastfm_0.3.2-1+b5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#998869: marked as done (nmu: ocaml-http_0.1.6-1+b1)

2021-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:06:57 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#998869: nmu: ocaml-http_0.1.6-1+b1 has caused the Debian Bug report #998869, regarding nmu: ocaml-http_0.1.6-1+b1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#998874: nmu: xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-5+b5

2021-11-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu xmlrpc-light_0.6.1-5+b5 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against ocamlnet 4.1.8-2+b1" Binary packages generated from this source package have broken dependencies since the rebuild of

Bug#998870: nmu: ocaml-lastfm_0.3.2-1+b5

2021-11-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ocaml-lastfm_0.3.2-1+b5 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against ocamlnet 4.1.8-2+b1" Binary packages generated from this source package have broken dependencies since the rebuild of

Bug#998873: nmu: pxp_1.2.9-2+b4

2021-11-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu pxp_1.2.9-2+b4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against ocamlnet 4.1.8-2+b1" Binary packages generated from this source package have broken dependencies since the rebuild of ocamlnet, and

Bug#998872: nmu: ocamlrss_2.2.2-1+b1

2021-11-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ocamlrss_2.2.2-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against ocamlnet 4.1.8-2+b1" Binary packages generated from this source package have broken dependencies since the rebuild of

Bug#998871: nmu: ocamldap_2.4.2-1

2021-11-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ocamldap_2.4.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against ocamlnet 4.1.8-2+b1" Binary packages generated from this source package have broken dependencies since the rebuild of ocamlnet,

Bug#998869: nmu: ocaml-http_0.1.6-1+b1

2021-11-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ocaml-http_0.1.6-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against ocamlnet 4.1.8-2+b1" Binary packages generated from this source package have broken dependencies since the rebuild of