Bug#1000982: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui

2021-12-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2021-12-02 08:40:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > We would like the Release

Processed: Re: Bug#1000982: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui

2021-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1000982 [release.debian.org] transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1000982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000982 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#998192: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26

2021-12-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Mattia and Sebastian, On 6 December 2021 at 22:44, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: | Yes! See https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec for the | documentation. | | Unfortunately there have been a few troubles getting a formal and good | specifical text that was "good enough" for the Debian Policy.

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2021-12-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > I have good experience with some of my upstreams where they supported me by > adapting their build system to enable building without the bundled/vendored > dependencies. Has this been tried? Would it be worth pursuing? It has been,

Bug#998192: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26

2021-12-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi Dirk, On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 03:15:22PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Instead of doing that, this could also be solved with a build profile. > | See https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec and the attached patch. See > | also gtk4 and libgtk-4-media-ffmpeg for an example. > > I can

Bug#998192: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26

2021-12-06 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Sebastian, On 6 December 2021 at 21:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: | gsl needs another upload. It currently lists libgsl-prof as package that | should be built, but it isn't. I've been told that in the past this has | been worked around by manually changing the .dsc before uploading. It has

Bug#998192: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26

2021-12-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Dirk On 2021-12-02 16:52:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 2 December 2021 at 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Yep. It's in the queue by now. I sometimes forget if an experimental -> > | unstable passage does or does not need an orig.tar.gz to go along or not but > | the bots will tell me

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2021-12-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 06-12-2021 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote: One lesson we may take from Mint, though, is that it's not worth trying to patch Chromium as much as we'd like. Anything that we can do to simplify the Chromium packaging will help us keep the package up-to-date, which in turn will help us keep

Bug#1000342: bullseye-pu: package mariadb-10.5 10.5.13-0+deb11u1

2021-12-06 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
MariaDB 10.6.5 has been uploaded to Sid and will replace 10.5 as soon as it has the initial bugs weeded out and is same or better overall quality as 10.5.

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2021-12-06 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > >> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on > >> d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a > >> discussion about ending security support for it in stable. > > > > The

Bug#1000342: bullseye-pu: package mariadb-10.5 10.5.13-0+deb11u1

2021-12-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 12:07 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 22:32 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > Final changelog: > > > > > > mariadb-10.5 (1:10.5.13-0+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium > .. > > Please go ahead. > > Uploading now Something I should have spotted

Bug#996997: buster-pu: Cleaning up the http-parser ABI breakage in Debian 10 ("buster")

2021-12-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:20:16PM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Julien Cristau: > > > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > >> Christoph Biedl wrote... > >> > >> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me

Bug#996997: buster-pu: Cleaning up the http-parser ABI breakage in Debian 10 ("buster")

2021-12-06 Thread Hilko Bengen
* Julien Cristau: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: >> Christoph Biedl wrote... >> >> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if >> > you prefer other things to happen first or instead. >> >> To avoid

Processed: Re: Bug#993100: bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1

2021-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #993100 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tag -1 + confirmed Bug #993100 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 993100:

Bug#993100: bullseye-pu: package udisks2/2.9.2-2+deb11u1

2021-12-06 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Control: tag -1 + confirmed On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 11:32:03PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Sven, > > thanks for chiming in > > On 05.12.21 21:46, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Regarding the patch proposed here, I would use an alternation for the > > recommends,

NEW changes in stable-new

2021-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: vim_8.2.2434-3+deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT