Le 10/01/2022 à 16:44, Paul Gevers a écrit :
On 10-01-2022 21:13, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I thought I filled RM bugs for all of them, but I found only #1003055
for php-apcu-bc, something must went wrong.
Neither of these support PHP 8.x, and those packages should be removed.
Seems like that need
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 976811 with 1003479
Bug #976811 [release.debian.org] transition: php8.1
976811 was blocked by: 978457 977377 977378 1002020 977376 980567 1003432
1000574 1000571 990322 1000568 977396 977340 977404 1000637 1002242 977400
977389 1003473 100
Hi,
On 10-01-2022 21:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 10-01-2022 21:13, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I thought I filled RM bugs for all of them, but I found only #1003055
for php-apcu-bc, something must went wrong.
Neither of these support PHP 8.x, and those packages should be removed.
I missed that. I
Hi,
On 10-01-2022 21:13, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I thought I filled RM bugs for all of them, but I found only #1003055 for
php-apcu-bc, something must went wrong.
Neither of these support PHP 8.x, and those packages should be removed.
I missed that. I'll remove them from testing already.
I’ll r
Hi
On 10-01-2022 21:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Ondřej,
Found via the transition tracker [0], just in case you forgot about
them, php-geoip [1], php-pinba [2], php-propro [3] php-stomp [4] and
php-apcu-bc [5] are awaiting new uploads from you for the transition and
because of source-only uploa
Hi Paul,
I thought I filled RM bugs for all of them, but I found only #1003055 for
php-apcu-bc, something must went wrong.
Neither of these support PHP 8.x, and those packages should be removed.
I’ll refill the missing RM bugs tomorrow.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@sury.org
> On 10.
Hi Ondřej,
Found via the transition tracker [0], just in case you forgot about
them, php-geoip [1], php-pinba [2], php-propro [3] php-stomp [4] and
php-apcu-bc [5] are awaiting new uploads from you for the transition and
because of source-only uploads.
Paul
[0] https://release.debian.org/tr
Processing control commands:
> block 976811 by -1
Bug #976811 [release.debian.org] transition: php8.1
976811 was blocked by: 1000574 977389 977400 1000653 977403 977378 977388
980567 977385 977379 1000596 1000593 1000637 1000655 1002020 1002232 1003007
1002218 1003472 1000619 1003432 1002215 977
Processing control commands:
> block 976811 by -1
Bug #976811 [release.debian.org] transition: php8.1
976811 was blocked by: 1003007 990322 1000655 1000647 1000474 977396 1000571
977687 977337 1002218 977384 1002242 1002020 977403 977377 1000263 978457
1000574 1002215 977376 980567 978151 977658
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 976811 by 1003432
Bug #976811 [release.debian.org] transition: php8.1
976811 was blocked by: 1000653 977379 1002218 1000650 1002020 977337 978151
1000619 977658 977388 977385 1003007 977403 977384 1000654 977404 1000642
1000568 977377 9784
On 1/10/22 05:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:23:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Btw, https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/tree/stable is my branch
with cleaned-up commits. That's what I'll use for the NMU, which I'm
preparing now.
If you all agree, you could fi
Your message dated Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:39:02 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1001587: transition: fmtlib
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001587,
regarding transition: fmtlib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1002286 [release.debian.org] transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1002286: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-01-10 17:41:17, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> I have received no negative feedback or blockers in the last 20 days, I'm
> afraid that we can not wait
> much longer since this bug is blocking others (like Dartsim transition). My
> plan would be to proceed
> with the p
I have received no negative feedback or blockers in the last 20 days, I'm
afraid that we can not wait
much longer since this bug is blocking others (like Dartsim transition). My
plan would be to proceed
with the plan in the next few days unless feedback appears in the next 48
hours.
Thanks!
Hi,
On 09-01-2022 23:22, David Prévot wrote:
This is important because some of these packages are currently allowed to migrate to testing without php-defaults (were it not for the autopgktest failure), and would
break functionality in testing. We need to find out how to fix that.
I assume you
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:23:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Btw, https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/tree/stable is my branch
> with cleaned-up commits. That's what I'll use for the NMU, which I'm
> preparing now.
If you all agree, you could finalize the tree, then I'll build again,
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 12:56:28AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> On 1/8/22 15:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official build,
> > > so
> > > those DCHECKs shouldn't even
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 02:46:47PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Please go ahead
Done and it seems that all rebuild have been scheduled and completed already!
Thanks especially for that quick turnaround!
Cheers,
--
tobi
19 matches
Mail list logo
