Bug#1017886: transition: zimlib

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org Hi, I'd like to do a transition of libzim 7->8. I've done local rebuilds of all the reverse dependencies, python-libzim needs a patch (ready in

Processed: unblock gnome-desktop

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 1016988 by 1016180 Bug #1016988 [release.debian.org] transition: nautilus 43 1016988 was blocked by: 1017576 1016180 1016988 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 1016988: 1016180 > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: Re: Bug#1017476: transition: poppler 22.08

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1017476 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 22.08 Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-poppler.html Bug #1017476 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 22.08 Set Bug

Bug#1017476: transition: poppler 22.08

Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-poppler.html On 2022-08-16 13:52:42 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Tags: moreinfo > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc:

Bug#1016923: marked as done (transition: mathcomp-finmap)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2022 19:05:46 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016923: Updated mathcomp-analysis has caused the Debian Bug report #1016923, regarding transition: mathcomp-finmap to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: Re: Bug#1017705: transition: benchmark

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1017705 [release.debian.org] transition: benchmark Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1017705: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017705 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1017705: transition: benchmark

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2022-08-19 10:15:50 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > I'd like to transition benchmark after upstream broke ABI compatibility

Bug#1017777: bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u4

Aurelien Jarno (2022-08-20): > [ Reason ] > There are multiple fixes in this upload, mostly coming from the upstream > stable branch: > - One security issue with CVE entry > - Multiple overflow fixes to wide string functions > - Failure to enforce libio vtable protection > - A performance issue

Processed: once more with the right pcre2 bug :(

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1017841 - moreinfo Bug #1017841 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package pcre2/10.36-2 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 1013448 + moreinfo Bug #1013448 [src:pcre2] pcre2 relies on write+execute mappings unnecessarily Added tag(s) moreinfo. >

Processed: once more with syntax

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1017841 + moreinfo Bug #1017841 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package pcre2/10.36-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1017841:

Bug#1017841: Acknowledgement (bullseye-pu: package pcre2/10.36-2)

Hi, Sorry, that debdiff had the wrong distro in the changelog; here's a correct one. Regards, Matthewdiff -u pcre2-10.36/debian/changelog pcre2-10.36/debian/changelog --- pcre2-10.36/debian/changelog +++ pcre2-10.36/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pcre2 (10.36-2+deb11u1) bullseye;

Bug#1017841: bullseye-pu: package pcre2/10.36-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I've backported the upstream security fixes for CVE-2022-1586 and CVE-2022-1587 to bullseye, and would like them to go in the next stable update, please. I consulted the