It seems I was a little bit out of date. Diane Trout has tried
with an unreleased snapshot which looks good with llvm-14
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024795
Will work on it soon.
On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 18:04 -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> I'm the regular uploader of
I'm the regular uploader of python3-llvmlite.
Please give up with numba. Its core dependency llvmlite is not even
ready for llvm != 11, while Sid had already get llvm-11 removed.
I have tried to cherry-pick an upstream fix to bump llvmlite's
llvm dependency to 12/14, but the autopkgtest shows
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: 994...@bugs.debian.org, debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Youtube-dl has mostly stopped development other than basic maintenance, and
development has resumed with the
On 2022-12-22 20:16:36 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Hi Luca
> >
> > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> > >
> > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at
On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Hi Luca
>
> On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> > >
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
Hi Timo (2022.12.22_12:56:20_+)
> > There have been rebuilds in Ubuntu that give us some idea of how much
> > work remains. I think it's tractable, but also will have some package
> > casualties.
> I have some spare time right now, and I am happy to help
> work on problematic cases, so
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 07:54:17PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> ChangZhuo, src:lxqt-session is in the same boat, but already changed it's
> Build-Dependency in experimental. An upload to unstable would be
> appreciated.
Uploaded to unstable
--
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
Your message dated Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:27:12 +0100
with message-id <7d1a4ac1-c6ec-b5f4-5ee5-87962e3a1...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1023495: transition: ruby3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023495,
regarding transition: ruby3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:32:49 +0500
with message-id <87mt7fwlta.fsf@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#1026794: nmu: logol_1.7.9+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026794,
regarding nmu: logol_1.7.9+dfsg-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
* Stefano Rivera [2022-12-22 12:44]:
There have been rebuilds in Ubuntu that give us some idea of how much
work remains. I think it's tractable, but also will have some package
casualties.
I have some spare time right now, and I am happy to help
work on problematic cases, so hopefully nobody
Hi Sandro (2022.12.22_00:13:36_+)
> It appears there has been little work in preparing the work to
> introduce python3.11 from its maintainer, instead that works has been
> pushed downstream to maintainers.
That is, I'm afraid, the only realistic approach for handling new Python
versions. It
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear release team,
We'd like to upload several bug fixes, including security fixes, for
systemd to bullseye.
The
On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 19:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> That's (in general) sub-optimal for the release team. We try hard to
> avoid entangling transitions and therefor we try to finish transitions
> sooner rather than later. My preference would be that you NMU (minimal
> changes) now; the maintainer
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1026794 [release.debian.org] nmu: logol_1.7.9+dfsg-6
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1026794 to the same tags previously set
--
1026794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1026794 [release.debian.org] nmu: logol_1.7.9+dfsg-6
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1026794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On 21-12-2022 09:49, Lev Lamberov wrote:
Please, binNMU logol 1.7.9+dfsg-6 (currently in unstable) against
swi-prolog 9.0.3+dfsg-1 (currently in unstable) to fix autopkgtests
failures and make transition to testing possible.
The version of logol in unstable passes its
Hi Craig,
On 22-12-2022 00:28, Craig Small wrote:
BUT, procps is in transition and this linking needs to happen before the
first freeze milestone so I will upload 20220525 linked to libproc2 if
we get near to running out of time.
That's (in general) sub-optimal for the release team. We try
17 matches
Mail list logo
