Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1031376 [release.debian.org] tzdata 2022g-3 removed /etc/timezone without
a proper transition, breaking multiple packages
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1031376 to the same tags previously set
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1031376
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1031376 [release.debian.org] tzdata 2022g-3 removed /etc/timezone without
a proper transition, breaking multiple packages
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1031376 [release.debian.org] tzdata 2022g-3 removed /etc/timezone
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi Daniel,
On 16-02-2023 01:11, Daniel Leidert wrote:
I ask you to
find a reasonable approach to deal with this for the Bookworm release.
That's not how we normally work. Please come with concrete proposals and
we can evaluate them.
"Theodore Ts'o" writes:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:06:55PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> You argue about shared libraries for non-packaged binaries. I think we
>> mostly don't care about that, and again, I think that's at least a
>> generally recognized thing that came out of our focus on
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:06:55PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> You argue about shared libraries for non-packaged binaries.
> I think we mostly don't care about that, and again, I think that's at
> least a generally recognized thing that came out of our focus on
> packages and package
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
A recent upload of tzdata [1] removes the file /etc/timezone from user's
computers. This broke multiple packages of the ruby-team (samizdat and
ruby-et-orbi being two of them). A quick search on
> "Theodore" == Theodore Ts'o writes:
Theodore> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:17:38PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>
>> I.E. I think your question of "for how long" has a very simple
>> answer based on our history: if we care about stability in this
>> instance it's for +/-1
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:17:38PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I.E. I think your question of "for how long" has a very simple answer
> based on our history: if we care about stability in this instance it's
> for +/-1 Debian release.
>
> I'm struggling trying to figure out whether we should
> "Theodore" == Theodore Ts'o writes:
the answer to your "how long" is that packages
>> should also work with the kernel from the previous and the kernel
>> from the next Debian release.
Theodore> This isn't a problem with the kernel.
I don't think that was Adrian's point.
I
Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:16:18 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1031361: unblock: grub2/2.06-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031361,
regarding unblock: grub2/2.06-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:47:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> For normal library dependencies
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.34)
> will do the right thing automatically.
Sure, but dependencies only apply if you are using building packages.
If you are not building packages, but just moving binaries
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hey folks!
Please unblock package grub2
We have a slew of bug fixes that we want in bookworm:
* Fix an issue in an f2fs security fix which caused mount
failures. Closes: #1021846.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:23 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > And regarding make golang-go the first alternative, currently we have:
> > + Build-Depends golang-any | golang-go | gccgo
> > + golang-any Depends golang-go | gccgo-go
> > Is there anything we can improve for aspcud resolver?
>
> The resolver
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:05:28PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 8:53 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > The package currently
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:53:13PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > >...
> > > The package currently FTBFS on i386/experimental but it won't be problem
> > > on
> > >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 8:53 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > >...
> > > The package currently FTBFS on i386/experimental but it won't be problem
> > > on
> > > unstable.
> >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:56 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >...
> > The package currently FTBFS on i386/experimental but it won't be problem on
> > unstable.
> > The dep-resolver (aspcud) in experimental chooses gccgo to bootstrap,
> >
Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:06:01 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock thunderbird
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031339,
regarding unblock: thunderbird/102.7.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:58:54AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>...
> The package currently FTBFS on i386/experimental but it won't be problem on
> unstable.
> The dep-resolver (aspcud) in experimental chooses gccgo to bootstrap,
> which has a bug https://github.com/golang/go/issues/51850.
> But
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: thunderb...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:thunderbird
Please unblock package thunderbird
[ Reason ]
Due some planed traveling on my side I packaged the
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:thunderbird
Bug #1031339 [release.debian.org] unblock: thunderbird/102.7.2-1
Added indication that 1031339 affects src:thunderbird
--
1031339: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031339
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:46:53PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>...
> I will draw the analogy of building a program which links against
> glibc for Bookworm resulting in a binary that will not run on Buster.
> We expect that, and we tell people to use build chroots. This is not
> something which
22 matches
Mail list logo
