Heyho!
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 14.47:11 Julien Cristau wrote:
- re-upload Sune's NMU version to t-p-u
Ok, done with the addition of an adjusted README.Debian. Updated the title,
too, this time, sorry about that.
cheers
-- vbi
--
featured link: http://www.pool.ntp.org
to C++
* Update to Policy 3.9.1
-- Adrian von Bidder c...@debian.org Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:17:45 +0200
+++
cheers
-- vbi
--
In Blythe, California, a city ordinance declares that a person must own
at least two cows before he can wear cowboy boots in public.
signature.asc
Description
and adjust README.Debian to match the new reality
* Convert symbol file to C++
* Update to Policy 3.9.1
-- Adrian von Bidder c...@debian.org Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:17:45 +0200
+++
cheers
-- vbi
--
In Blythe, California, a city ordinance declares that a person must own
at least two cows
Hi,
Can postgrey 1.27-4 be let into etch?
* corrects a 'fails during remove/purge' bug which is not that hard to
trigger (fails always if the daemon is not running at remove time.)
- http://bugs.debian.org/401902
* a documentation fix
* was uploaded before the freeze
* no other
Yodel!
I'm just wondering if #397771 (SASL auth breaks with current postfix + cyrus
sasl from testing) shouldn't be RC. As far as I understand, basically
every postfix+sasl set up will break on sarge-etch upgrade.
(latest bug activity: 25. November)
Sorry to be unable to help.
cheers
-- vbi
Yo!
I'm not quite sure why #340709 (don't release RC marker bug) is marked as
resolved. I tried to reopen it with a found command because I don't
think it should be shipped with etch but then didn't follow up. I've just
now seen that the bug is not open and rapple is still in testing.
reopen 340709
thanks
On Sunday 12 November 2006 22:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I'm not quite sure why #340709 (don't release RC marker bug) is marked
as resolved.
Because you marked it as resolved with the message:
After
On Monday 17 July 2006 17:00, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 01:18:41PM +, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
There was a new request for another approved release goal, that is NFS
v4 support. We approved that goal.
AFAICS, that goal has been completed for a while.
Small
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 03.25, Florent Bayle wrote:
[libpano12]
http://www.virtualproperties.com/noipix/patents.html suggests that there
is clear prior art in this case. I have taken this link from previous
discution on debian-legal. But Robert Jordens thinks that :
The prior art argument is
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 10.31, Andreas Barth wrote:
volatile is also mentioned in the release notes.
[...]
With volatile being mentioned in the release notes (and it being a
debian.net service, thus not-entirely-official), a clarifying note should
imho be added to explain what the difference is
10 matches
Mail list logo
