Hi I'm here

On Nov 19, 2017 11:45 AM, "final notice" <p...@debian.org> wrote:

> important information
>
>
> <http://shineslim.com/cl/r-S676S1D33168S179AKS1E3O8SE3NS0S0S0S15S2SBSCCS21FS21OSA>
>
>
> <http://shineslim.com/cl/ua-S676S1D33168S179AKS1E3O8SE3NS0S0S0S15S2SBSCCS21FS21OSA>
>
>
> <http://shineslim.com/cl/op-S676S1D33168S179AKS1E3O8SE3NS0S0S0S15S2SBSCCS21FS21OSA>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply via email to