Bug#683251: unblock: libisoburn/1.2.2-2

2012-08-02 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 22:32:59 Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:54:50 +0200, George Danchev wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, [ please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed

Bug#683251: unblock: libisoburn/1.2.2-2

2012-07-30 Thread George Danchev
+by version 1.0.6 (Closes: #683248) + + -- George Danchev danc...@spnet.net Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:26:57 +0200 + libisoburn (1.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru libisoburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/series libisoburn-1.2.2/debian/patches/series --- libisoburn-1.2.2/debian/patches

Bug#681178: unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2

2012-07-12 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 12 July 2012 06:38:15 Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 08:27:23AM +0200, George Danchev wrote: I've got three minor bugfixes from not yet released libburn 1.2.4, which I'd like to apply to libburn/1.2.2-1. I've not yet uploaded libburn 1.2.2-2, so this is a request

Bug#681178: unblock: libburn/1.2.2-2

2012-07-11 Thread George Danchev
(Closes: #680968) 03_cdrskin-sigsegv-track-source-added-no-drive-available cdrskin could SIGSEGV if track source was added when no drive was available. -- George Danchev danc...@spnet.net Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:47:15 +0200 unblock libburn/1.2.2-2 -- System Information: Debian Release

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

2012-05-16 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 16:44:40 Cyril Brulebois wrote: tag 672562 pending thanks Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (14/05/2012): This looks like quite self-contained, so I might get back to you soon to get this transition started. Ping me back by wednesday if you didn't hear from me by

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

2012-05-14 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 14 May 2012 03:10:58 Cyril Brulebois wrote: George Danchev danc...@spnet.net (13/05/2012): Just to add few more hopefully helpful bits. 1) the changelog of not yet uploaded package to sid, waiting for your green light: Thanks, that's appreciated. You're welcome. [given

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

2012-05-14 Thread George Danchev
JFTR (as it was perfectly clear from my first mail) The versions currently found in sid of: bisonc++ flexc++ oxref stealth xd ccbuild aside, due to FTBFS with GCC 4.7 #667132 were also successfully built against the new bobcat 3.00.02-1 package in a clean current sid chroot, resp. GCC (Debian

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

2012-05-13 Thread George Danchev
Just to add few more hopefully helpful bits. 1) the changelog of not yet uploaded package to sid, waiting for your green light: bobcat (3.00.02-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (bumps the soname version). + Arg, ArgConfig and ConfigFile use the bridge design pattern.

Bug#672562: transition: bobcat

2012-05-11 Thread George Danchev
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, The new bobcat library (3.00.02) bumps soname version. We have prepared a new package and tested in as well (JFTR: debcheckout and get-orig-source work as expected)

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-20 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:04:33 PM Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! Hi, * George Danchev danc...@spnet.net [2011-06-18 14:45:43 CEST]: [libburnia story] I can't speak for the stable release team, but I guess they won't approve the changes you have outlined here. They sound pretty

libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-18 Thread George Danchev
Dear Release and Backports teams, Our libburnia packages (src:libburn/libisofs/libisoburn) in squeeze are rapidly getting way too old as compared to these found in sid and testing. The versions currently found in squeeze do not support JTE (jigdo Template Export), lack quite some other

Re: libburn/libisofs/libisoburn - point release, t-p-u or bpo

2011-06-18 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 03:45:43 PM George Danchev wrote: Dear Release and Backports teams, To correct my typos, t-p-u in the subject to be read as s-p-u (stable proposed updates). Our libburnia packages (src:libburn/libisofs/libisoburn) in squeeze are rapidly getting way too old

Re: Bug#623378: patch for #623378

2011-04-28 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 25 April 2011 18:38:56 Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 22:22 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: The patch Thomas Schmitt referred to from here: http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/3537/libburn/trunk is attached below in debdiff form (applies cleanly to

Re: Bug#623378: patch for #623378

2011-04-20 Thread George Danchev
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 05:22:35 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Hi, The patch Thomas Schmitt referred to from here: http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/3537/libburn/trunk is attached below in debdiff form (applies cleanly to 0.8.0.pl00-2), and resolves the permissions of test.iso from

Re: Bug#594704: Freeze exception for roxterm 1.18.5-2

2010-09-10 Thread George Danchev
George Danchev writes: Mehdi Dogguy writes: On 08/26/2010 10:52 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: It's been working without issues for me since I finalised the current version of the patch. Can you upload to unstable then? I'll let it age a bit and then unblock it. Ping me in two weeks

pre-approval request to upload libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-3 to unstable

2010-09-02 Thread George Danchev
xorrisofs and xorrecord symlinks. + + -- George Danchev danc...@spnet.net Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:30:02 +0300 + libisoburn (0.5.6.pl00-2) unstable; urgency=low * Do not install gifs in the doc package, since newer doxygen -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu

Bug#594704: Freeze exception for roxterm 1.18.5-2

2010-08-28 Thread George Danchev
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Mehdi Dogguy writes: On 08/26/2010 10:52 PM, Tony Houghton wrote: It's been working without issues for me since I finalised the current version of the patch. Can you upload

Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

2010-08-27 Thread George Danchev
Adam D. Barratt writes: On Fri, August 27, 2010 10:28, Yavor Doganov wrote: В 10:03 +0100 на 27.08.2010 (пт), Adam D. Barratt написа: On Fri, August 27, 2010 09:26, Yavor Doganov wrote: Sure, does this mean that with this change the update is approved and can be uploaded?

Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

2010-08-18 Thread George Danchev
Julien Cristau writes: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: +# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is not +#

Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

2010-08-18 Thread George Danchev
Yavor Doganov writes: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: These files are supposed to be regenerated in postinst by update-dictcommon-aspell; that's a feature. Then why is it shipped in the

Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

2010-08-18 Thread George Danchev
Yavor Doganov writes: Георги Данчев wrote: I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated files as FAILED, which is to be expected. I

Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

2010-08-18 Thread George Danchev
Russ Allbery writes: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong. This is weird, but the aspell packages have been doing this for quite some time, long enough

Re: Freeze exception for roxterm 1.18.5-2

2010-08-15 Thread George Danchev
Quoting Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk: On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:06:43 +0100 Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: Shortly after the freeze a bug was found in roxterm 1.18.5 and I would like to have it fixed in squeeze by allowing the inclusion of 1.18.5-2. The Debian bug is 592984

allow libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-2 in testing

2010-08-13 Thread George Danchev
Hi Release Team, Please allow libisoburn/0.5.6.pl00-2 (which was finally built on hppa this night) to enter testing. It fixes FTBFS #590396 -- newer doxygen does not generate tab*.gif anymore, thus *.gif are not tried to be installed as in 0.5.6.pl00-1. By the way, doxygen is a timebomb on

Re: pre-approval for glibc/2.3.6.ds1-13etch9 (stable)

2009-01-04 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 04 January 2009 10:52:38 Riku Voipio wrote: On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:30:51AM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Aurelien Jarno wrote: I am planning to do an upload of glibc/stable to switch Slovenia and Slovakia to Euro. Slovakia has joined the Eurozone a few days ago, and

request removal of shc package from lenny

2008-12-07 Thread George Danchev
Hello Release Team, Hereby I request removal of the shc package from lenny. The package is well maintained, but it always has an inherit problem in its main function to encrypt shell scripts as decribed in #327263 (generally it passes the scripts back to sh -c which could be easily stolen from

Re: freeze exception for yodl_2.13.1-1 (fixes RC bug) please allow into lenny

2008-09-27 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 26 September 2008 15:31:01 Neil McGovern wrote: On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:40:43PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: please allow yodl_2.13.1-1 into Lenny. It fixes the RC bug #499421. Fine, however: This will need to go in with ecasound, please re-ping when both are ready to go

freeze exception for yodl_2.13.1-1 (fixes RC bug) please allow into lenny

2008-09-24 Thread George Danchev
Dear release team, please allow yodl_2.13.1-1 into Lenny. It fixes the RC bug #499421. the debian changelog reads: yodl (2.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #499421). the upstream changelog reads: yodl (2.13.1) * yodl2whatever no longer supports the

Please allow c++-annotations (6.5.0-1) to propagate to etch

2006-12-11 Thread George Danchev
Dear Release Team, Please allow c++-annotations in sid (6.5.0-1) to propagate to etch (6.4.1-1). This package is mere documentation and has some nice streamlining wrt c++ style recommendations as well as Portuguese translation has been added in this new upstream release. There are no

Please update bisonc++ in testing to version 1.5.0-1

2006-11-01 Thread George Danchev
Hello Debian Release, Please allow the new version of bisonc++ 1.5.0-1 to propagate into testing.  It fixes a known problem with some grammars (#395291) which is now resolved. This bug is normal (more like a heads-up one) and the old version is still usable, but the solution provided to

Re: Debian Naming Suggestion

2006-09-09 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 08 September 2006 20:14, Jeremy Herndon wrote: I currently do not subscribe to the mailing lists. So I don't know if this has been considered. Hi, Ok, CC:ed, but probaby -project is a far better place to discuss sich considerations. I want to offer a suggestion for a new

Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

2006-08-06 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:30, Marco d'Itri wrote: In linux.debian.kernel Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for me to ignore the opinion of the