Re: preparing for GCC 4.9

/porting_to.html [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.9;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org OK. I will cooperate in ppc64 port as possible as i do, at least, tests of rebuilding the packages of buildd with gcc-4.9. Regards, - -- Hiroyuki Yamamoto A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA

Re: Bug#731069: gcc-defaults: Please resume considering to change using unified version of gcc

Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:52:22AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 02.12.2013 23:20, schrieb Hiroyuki Yamamoto: Hi, I don't know whether it is appropriate that I remark, I have no objection to moving to gcc-4.8 on ppc64, too. this is not a question about any

Re: Bug#731069: gcc-defaults: Please resume considering to change using unified version of gcc

Hi, (2013/12/04 9:52), Matthias Klose wrote: Am 02.12.2013 23:20, schrieb Hiroyuki Yamamoto: Hi, I don't know whether it is appropriate that I remark, I have no objection to moving to gcc-4.8 on ppc64, too. this is not a question about any objections, but about a call to the ppc64 porters

Re: Bug#731069: gcc-defaults: Please resume considering to change using unified version of gcc

, no feedback - sh4, no feedback, doesn't build, CCing Nobuhiro Iwamatsu Am 01.12.2013 16:45, schrieb Hiroyuki Yamamoto: Source: gcc-defaults Version: 1.123 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please resume considering to change using unified version of gcc, because FTBFS of many packages occur

Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing

am not yet a DD/DM. Hiroyuki Yamamoto - -- Hiroyuki Yamamoto A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net